The events in Manchester

Bring it, you dumbfuck... I hand your ass to you every time numbers are involved (as well as every time they aren't). And since you are too stupid to comprehend - let alone analyze - the federal budget, all you ever do is cut and paste from lib-retarded websites that are easy prey for anyone who knows how to read numbers. Originally Posted by lustylad

The last time you did not want to assign the portion of the debt that deficit Defense spending was the root of.

You act as if that 20 Trillion dollar debt has nothing to do with Defense spending! .

The last time you did not want to assign the portion of the debt that deficit Defense spending was the root of.

You act as if that 20 Trillion dollar debt is not any of out (sic) deficit spend (sic) on Defense. Originally Posted by WTF

Not true, fagboy. You keep trying to assign or attribute ALL of the deficits and the debt to military spending, which is libtard nonsense. As a percent of the federal budget and our GDP, defense spending has declined dramatically since World War II. I already demonstrated that to your clueless ass last time. Don't make me do it again.

Newby, "travel bans" have nothing to do with "vetting"! You've been ingesting too much of the Liberal pablum.

The use of the term "vetting" is a trendy, bullshit word that has little meaning in the RW environment overseas, when USA experiences are used to create "standards" for doing background checks on people who want to travel to this country. The massacre at San Bernardino demonstrated what "vetting" was doing. Nothing.

Obaminable had 8 years to "improve vetting" and since San Bernardino happened on his watch he had another 12 MONTHS to jump on it and improve the quality of the "vetting" since he wanted to open up the "gates" and let the folks in.

So you need to know what the enhanced processes and techniques are now?

And you pretend if you don't know they don't exist?

For starters ... go find your family documents (birth records)!
Originally Posted by LexusLover

The travel bans were intended to give the U.S. time to see if the vetting processes of immigrants/refugees were 100% effective.

Source: http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/30/politi...l-ban-q-and-a/

"President Trump signed an executive order Friday night to keep refugees from entering the country for 120 days and immigrants from seven predominantly Muslim nations out for three months. The countries affected are Iran, Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Libya, Yemen and Somalia. This is the "extreme vetting" Trump promised during the campaign, but it still seems to have caught folks by surprise."

You should quit while your are simply losing. One of the San Bernardino killers, Syed Farook, was a U.S. born citizen. His wife was a lawful permanent resident of the U.S. who entered this country and had submitted her fingerprints and underwent 3 extensive national security and criminal background screenings. She also underwent 2 in-depth interviews. No irregularities or signs of suspicion were found during this vetting process. Would anything short of an outright ban of immigrants from Pakistan stopped her from entering the U.S. legally? Doubtful. And she was not from any of the 7 countries in Trump's travel ban.

I have no idea if any enhanced vetting processes are in affect. Can you PROVE they exist or are the simply a product of your addlepated mind?

Not true, fagboy. You keep trying to assign or attribute ALL of the deficits and the debt to military spending, which is libtard nonsense. As a percent of the federal budget and our GDP, defense spending has declined dramatically since World War II. I already demonstrated that to your clueless ass last time. Don't make me do it again. Originally Posted by lustylad

I did not want to assign all of it but even if one took a low %, the debt assigned to Defense is huge. The largest portion by far.

You will agree none can be assigned to SS or Medicare.