Reviews are essential for a new provider. Once she has established a little credibility, I am not sure how important they are.
Originally Posted by heidilynnla
I agree reviews are essential for a new provider. But from the hobbyist's standpoint, there are other issues.
I can only speak from my experience as a hobbyist. When I first started to hobby, I read a lot of reviews. You don't come into the hobby knowing which ladies are ligit, which are not. You don't know which review websites are good, which are crap. And this kind of info doesn't appear in Wikipedia.
As a newbie hobbyist you have to rely on reviews...even for well established ladies b/c you just don't know them. For instance, before I got on the motherboard or here, I didn't know shit about Becky, Ansley, Elisabeth, Dallas, Tiffany, or any of the other ladies that regularly post here. To take L's reference, I was a Tabula Rasa when it came to the ladies.
So, even for ladies who have had a wealth of reviews, newbie hobbyists won't know about your reputation unless they can see recent reviews (newbies, I think, don't search the history of reviews on a regular basis). Now, maybe you don't care about newbies, and that's fine.
BTW, as my signature block says, I don't do reviews any more. And I don't read them, for the most part. Sometimes, I'll open a review to find something I couldn't find elsewhere, like the lady's fee structure, web site, or location. But I really don't pay much attention to the menu, and I don't have ROS access so I can't see the BCD written description.