SCOTUS strikes down gay marriage bans nationwide

So let's disregard the constitution either we are founded by Christian principles or not - which is it ? Countries with true theocracies like Iran or Saudi Arabia have laws based on their faith if you happen to be of a different sect or faith that's your bad luck.
By your own statement Shamn lets tear up the constitution and have a do as the fuck you want doctrine to govern us - hell let's let Muslims in this county establish Shariah law in their communities - lets make it perfectly legal for a man to have multiple wives Originally Posted by wellendowed1911

Wow. You sound like the rest of the mad dog dimwits around here. Get a grip.

Religion makes people absolutely nutty.

The constitution laid in place one thing that most certainly was the biggest factor in making this country the greatest place on earth, and that was the separation of church and state.

So the constitution isn't built on christianity, WE, not even close.

If a man wants to have multiple wives, and if the wives are okay with it too, then I don't see why that is a problem. I don't give a flying fuck what other people do with their personal lives and you shouldn't either. Originally Posted by shanm

Please be the catalyst and start the campaign to get polygamy legalized. You are exactly what I just mentioned earlier- you are so open-minded that you basically have stated screw God's law and let's just do whatever the fuck we want. Also, can you tell me which of the founding fathers were atheist? I'll raise you 2 to 1- for every founding father that you can prove were atheist I will front you 100 dollars and for every Founding Father that was Christian or believed in God you front me 50 bucks- you will still lose. Stop trying to re-write history- it's evident that the founding fathers were Godly men with Christian principles.

Please be the catalyst and start the campaign to get polygamy legalized. You are exactly what I just mentioned earlier- you are so open-minded that you basically have stated screw God's law and let's just do whatever the fuck we want. Also, can you tell me which of the founding fathers were atheist? I'll raise you 2 to 1- for every founding father that you can prove were atheist I will front you 100 dollars and for every Founding Father that was Christian or believed in God you front me 50 bucks- you will still lose. Stop trying to re-write history- it's evident that the founding fathers were Godly men with Christian principles. Originally Posted by wellendowed1911

Ask yourself: was I the one who brought up the founding fathers?
You're starting to sound a hell of a lot like IB now.

Yes, I basically did say "screw god's law", because I don't believe there is a fucking fairy up there making wishes come true.

I don't give a damn what god said and I can tell that you don't either. He told not to fuck hookers but I see that you have no problem in that department.

Answer my question, WeeEndowed, the white God Fauxing Christian? Why do you hold gays to a standard that you not only refuse to hold, but but brag about breaking? I will tell you why. You are a phony hypocrite. According to the Bible, which you pretend to believe, any sex outside of marriage is a sin. Why should gays be ashamed of their "sin" while you are proud of yours, and even boast about it? What makes you so much better than gays that you can judge them, but hold yourself blameless?

Oh, and before I forget, have you turned over those threatening pms yet? Or did you miss the part about "Thou shalt not lie?"

Answer my question, WeeEndowed, the white God Fauxing Christian? Why do you hold gays to a standard that you not only refuse to hold, but but brag about breaking? I will tell you why. You are a phony hypocrite. According to the Bible, which you pretend to believe, any sex outside of marriage is a sin. Why should gays be ashamed of their "sin" while you are proud of yours, and even boast about it? What makes you so much better than gays that you can judge them, but hold yourself blameless?

Oh, and before I forget, have you turned over those threatening pms yet? Or did you miss the part about "Thou shalt not lie?" Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

COIdiot, when are you and your ATF, "Sweet Ass" IIFFY, planning to finally "tie the knot?"

We've been thinking about tying the knot around your neck, but we can't find a rope long enough to get around all your chins.

We've been thinking about tying the knot around your neck, but we can't find a rope long enough to get around all your chins. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

OK, now that's funny there, I don't care who you are...

Now, it's not only the minorities trying to get free shit, it's gays too right?

You and your Uncle Goober analysis....what a joke. It would be amusing if you weren't so fucking scarey with your dismissive attitude for people's rights. Since when do you have any idea what gays think or feel? And, how do you know most gays don't want to have a partner for life and even if that is true, what the fuck does that have to do with treating people like human beings and equal under the law?

And, plenty of heterosexuals marry and don't procreate you jackass.

And, now marriage is a "benefits package"? This is what you are so against gay people having it? You're a nut. Originally Posted by timpage

I didn't say anything about race, you did. It plays no role in my argument.

The vast majority of heterosexuals entering into their first marriage are doing so with the intention of having children . Many fail because of medical issues they spend a small fortune trying to fix. Others adopt.

Yes, there is a "benefits package" (or was) associated with being married. Like all "benefits packages" I am against those who don't "pay in." Homosexuals for the large part won't pay in.

I work with both gays and lesbians in a Fortune 500 company. Some of them are in the closet, most aren't and some are simply discreet. A few want to get married or have been married (to a homosexual) but none want to have children. Many don't want to get married but want to put someone on their insurance. I don't blame them. If their friend was HIV+ and treatment was financially out of reach I can see them claiming them. If I was single and not in good conscious I could "sell" my benefits package for a quite tidy amount.

Again the purpose of marriage is to have and raise children. You and the Supreme Court have convoluted it.

The government has no business regulating marriage. The Court would have better served the country by ruling that this was a right to be left up to the individual, rather than any level of government.

Marriage was invented to make succession of property more easy to determine.


Marry who you want.

Marriage ruined a lot of good relationships, so look forward to more divorces.

"It's an ill-wind that blows no good, and an ill homosexual" ...oh, never mind.

We've been thinking about tying the knot around your neck, but we can't find a rope long enough to get around all your chins. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Who am I to deny you that wish?

Truthfully though, I'm not worried about anything you might do.

Thus far, all you've ever done in your miserable existence is run and hide.

Why would you do anything differently now?

"Once a coward, always a coward!" Isn't that your motto, COIdiot?

COIdiot dodging the draft ----->

But if that is your wish, give it your best shot.

We'll let the chips fall where they may!

We've been thinking about tying the knot around your neck, but we can't find a rope long enough to get around all your chins. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

That was a great response. You bitch slapped that ignorant slut!!

I didn't say anything about race, you did. It plays no role in my argument.

The vast majority of heterosexuals entering into their first marriage are doing so with the intention of having children . Many fail because of medical issues they spend a small fortune trying to fix. Others adopt.

Yes, there is a "benefits package" (or was) associated with being married. Like all "benefits packages" I am against those who don't "pay in." Homosexuals for the large part won't pay in.

I work with both gays and lesbians in a Fortune 500 company. Some of them are in the closet, most aren't and some are simply discreet. A few want to get married or have been married (to a homosexual) but none want to have children. Many don't want to get married but want to put someone on their insurance. I don't blame them. If their friend was HIV+ and treatment was financially out of reach I can see them claiming them. If I was single and not in good conscious I could "sell" my benefits package for a quite tidy amount.

Again the purpose of marriage is to have and raise children. You and the Supreme Court have convoluted it. Originally Posted by gnadfly

Imagine the dilemmas created by this law. A gay man has a friend who is HIV positive. He creates a sham marriage to milk Starbucks for the marriage benefits of paid medical for the hugely expensive treatments.

Starbucks sniffs this out and goes to civil court to recover their payments, and criminal court for fraud. To prove it isn't a sham, he needs to prove he has been fucking a gay man with HIV. He will have a hard time getting cock after that!!!!

That was a great response. You bitch slapped that ignorant slut!! Originally Posted by DSK

Don't you wish that you could come up with something pithy, funny and smart?

Oh, well.....

Imagine the dilemmas created by this law. A gay man has a friend who is HIV positive. He creates a sham marriage to milk Starbucks for the marriage benefits of paid medical for the hugely expensive treatments.

Starbucks sniffs this out and goes to civil court to recover their payments, and criminal court for fraud. To prove it isn't a sham, he needs to prove he has been fucking a gay man with HIV. He will have a hard time getting cock after that!!!! Originally Posted by DSK

Ha ha, yeah I can't wait for that one.

How long did it take you to think that one up, you fucking simpleton?