Why Do Hobbyists Avoid Seeing Providers Who Got Tattoos On Their Body ... ?

Because none of you all have ever been with a tattoo model and legit boxer. That's all
LexusLover's Avatar
Because none of you all have ever been with a tattoo model and legit boxer. That's all Originally Posted by sexyblue21
Not that I know of ... do you know any off hand?
  • cr76
  • 10-29-2015, 07:27 AM
Because none of you all have ever been with a tattoo model and legit boxer. That's all Originally Posted by sexyblue21
Legit boxer? Like female Boxer? you don;t have to be a model to have good ink work.
LexusLover's Avatar
Legit boxer? Originally Posted by cr76
Cassius Clay was "legit"!
  • cr76
  • 10-29-2015, 08:27 AM
Cassius Clay was "legit"! Originally Posted by LexusLover
lol

Not my type - a little too butch for me.

If he was referring to someone like Rhonda Rousey, Incredibly Sexy Gina Carano, Paige Vanzant, Miesha Tate, or Rachel Wray. then no i have not, but of course if i could swing those girls, I don't think i'd be on ECCIE.
MisterMeat's Avatar
Tats aren't for everyone. Personally, I don't care for them. I don't have any tats and I prefer a provider that does not have any. I can hang with one or two if they are not distracting but any more is a distraction to me and takes away from the session. I'm currently looking for a hot blonde provider with no tats...any suggestions??
  • cr76
  • 10-29-2015, 09:47 AM
MMMMMMM
bbkid's Avatar
  • bbkid
  • 10-29-2015, 10:46 AM
I'm currently looking for a hot blonde provider with no tats...any suggestions?? Originally Posted by MisterMeat
Jemma Martin
TravelingGentleman's Avatar
To the OP (apologies for being so late in the discussion):

Tattoos don't equate to art. They can be, but they can be equally deforming, distracting, or distasteful. I don't think any men here would object to something like this:



And these kinds of tattoos are definitely art:


As you browse around the provider profiles though...they aren't all artsy.



Or distracting...


All things in moderation.
  • cr76
  • 10-29-2015, 11:16 AM
To the OP (apologies for being so late in the discussion):

Tattoos don't equate to art. They can be, but they can be equally deforming, distracting, or distasteful. I don't think any men here would object to something like this:



And these kinds of tattoos are definitely art:




As you browse around the provider profiles though...they aren't all artsy.





Or distracting...


All things in moderation. Originally Posted by TravelingGentleman
Very true I the moderation - anything can be over done - but done correctly - tattoos can be incredibly sexy.
LexusLover's Avatar
If he was referring to someone like Rhonda Rousey,....... Originally Posted by cr76
About sexyblue21
Location
boulder
Gender
Female


Just to clarify ...
  • cr76
  • 10-29-2015, 12:11 PM
About sexyblue21
Location
boulder
Gender
Female


Just to clarify ... Originally Posted by LexusLover
ooopps

my bad

So then would make sexy blue a tattoo model and boxer?
Would Mike Tyson in a pink tutu qualify? cause that's what I'm gonna get soon.
I don't think any men here would object to something like this:
I would - no matter how well done the ink it doesn't belong on a young hot nearly perfect female body. I don't give a rats ass about tattoos on old fat ladies or men. Young fat ladies can tat-a-way too.
  • cr76
  • 10-29-2015, 05:01 PM
Would Mike Tyson in a pink tutu qualify? cause that's what I'm gonna get soon. Originally Posted by Moto
LOL - If that's what you want?

I would - no matter how well done the ink it doesn't belong on a young hot nearly perfect female body. I don't give a rats ass about tattoos on old fat ladies or men. Young fat ladies can tat-a-way too. Originally Posted by Stanfeld
In the end, it's up to you to decide. Everyone has their taste and preference.