Cassius Clay was "legit"! Originally Posted by LexusLoverlol
To the OP (apologies for being so late in the discussion):Very true I the moderation - anything can be over done - but done correctly - tattoos can be incredibly sexy.
Tattoos don't equate to art. They can be, but they can be equally deforming, distracting, or distasteful. I don't think any men here would object to something like this:
And these kinds of tattoos are definitely art:
As you browse around the provider profiles though...they aren't all artsy.
Or distracting...
All things in moderation. Originally Posted by TravelingGentleman
I don't think any men here would object to something like this:I would - no matter how well done the ink it doesn't belong on a young hot nearly perfect female body. I don't give a rats ass about tattoos on old fat ladies or men. Young fat ladies can tat-a-way too.
Would Mike Tyson in a pink tutu qualify? cause that's what I'm gonna get soon. Originally Posted by MotoLOL - If that's what you want?
I would - no matter how well done the ink it doesn't belong on a young hot nearly perfect female body. I don't give a rats ass about tattoos on old fat ladies or men. Young fat ladies can tat-a-way too. Originally Posted by StanfeldIn the end, it's up to you to decide. Everyone has their taste and preference.