Nina that's a great point for a different threAD, this one is mine
Originally Posted by Wayward
sorry Wayward, didn`t mean to hijack..:-)
Originally Posted by ninasastri
As you'll almost always see in the OP of any threAD we start, I don't believe there is really an off topic post or a hijack. Sometimes the best point is made going off topic and yours was a great one.
That being said I also believe the threAD starter bears some responsibility to steer the conversation back on to some topic even if it isn't the original one. That's all I was trying to do. No harm, no foul on your part. Plus I wanted to thank you for letting me quote myself and OHW again.
Originally Posted by onehitwonder
...if someone knowingly commits an act such as Dannie has mentioned in the above quote, should they be allowed to remain a member of this board? To socialize, advertise and quite possibly use it to do harm to someone else? So do they get to change their name, their location, maybe their look, hang up a new shingle and back to business as usual while some poor guy is somewhere trying to put his life/family/job back together?
That is the topic perfectly distilled in OHW clarity. What I was trying to get from everyone and we seem to lack some Diamond ovaries and Tuxedo testicles, is what to do next? If that is the bar who holds it and what do we as a community do when some one tries to slither under it?
Originally Posted by Wayward
Let me pick on Camille for a moment because her posts were great. She went in two different directions and then came to a conclusion that I share up to a point, I don't want to "out" anyone. Unless and this is why I'm quoting the snot out of myself and onehitter, unless there is an overwhelming reason to do so. As some of you may have guessed I have been presented with such a situation.
Camille seems to think that the goal of all this is to justify outing someone's personal information and that is just not the case. It is about highlighting a pattern of behaviors that would trouble current and potential new clients of a active provider that has distanced herself from those behaviors by changing names. While I can not speak for all providers but some of the "women we love" would be very offended that their sterling reputations that have been won by working under one name are diminished by others that have in my opinion gamed the system.
As those of you that are unlucky enough to know me understand, while I will seek everyone's council at the end of the day, will stand on my hind legs and make the call. Then fade the results of that action, what ever they may be. I have a pretty good idea what I am going to do, before ever starting this discussion. Because as I was shocked to learn, I am not the king of the world or the smartest person in this space time continuum it seemed wise to seek the thoughts of some folks in 'this thing of ours' I do respect and value.
I'll also ask WTF
There is a post a few pages back by Rudyard K that really did make me stop and think for a bit, that is what I wanted to get out of this threAD a moment of reflection.
If you missed it is on page five. There are a couple of great one's on Page 4 by Dannie.
For RK we agree one can never know what is in another's heart. At what point does that simple truth have to step aside for the good of the community?
For Dannie that is exactly the kind of thing that I wanted to discuss in this threAD:
I understand the reasons for name changes and yes I believe some transgressions should be forgiven. Blackmail and outing are two unforgivable offenses, in my opinion, and I think turnabout is fair play. Shame them and name them!
I would add cash and dash or any other kind of serious theft and we are not talking about small unrepaid provider "loans" but the kind of thing
Dannie goes on about in her next post.
Sisyphus just defined my ethical quandary and is at more or less the same place I was when starting all this.
After picking on WTF it's time to in closing agree with him, we have discussed privately dealing with folks that are sanity challenged and he is right the back channel doesn't suck for the very issues we are attempting to explore here. However sometimes and in some cases perhaps that isn't enough and I would ask him and everyone else what might those be?
Again I don't expect a definitive answer and am not the only one privy to this information. So this discussion is not just for me or the indivual posters but is as the topic stated
an inquiry into ethics.