Sugar Daddy Sites

Oh crap was it that old? Ok, NOW you guys can call me stupid!

Fixed that for ya Jack. Originally Posted by London Rayne

Sweetie it wasn't you, it was Landon on page one.

Well she already said we could call her stupid... haha!

Bwahahaha!! Go ahead..it's not the worst I have been called.

After reading all of this, I have come to one conclusion........hooking is too much like work......ijs.

I don't care if I'm considered a poser, a wanna be, or a pretender. Thanks to some of Jack's advice, I'm plowing an 18 y/o and a 25 y/o on weekly basis for less money than I would pay an average Eccie provider for an hour. Hurt me by calling me a fake SD, lol! Originally Posted by Three Piece Chicken Dinne

+1

thanks Jack.

I think the biggest difference is site like SA put the man in control. To me it reverses the role of man and woman/provider. For the most part we are the one who does the screening, we are the ones decides if we wont to go forward with the relationship, we set the limits etc. Plus I think it is the thrill of the hunt as one poster put it. I forget the poster handle but he said something to this effect "would you rather hunt, kill and cook your meat or have it processed and pre cooked all you have to do is warm it up? No pun intended but to eat their own but I prefer being a hunter BUT I do like a good TV dinner once in awhile lol. (No disrespect to any provider just trying to make a point)

Also with that said there is a fair amount of women who are not really looking for a traditional SD they just looking for some good dick (key word there is GOOD) on the side. So why pay 200 or so for JUST an hour with a provider when you can do dinner and a movie for say 100 and spend quality time (hours) with a chick who is just as pretty or prettier than a provider and still get the same wet hole that you are ultimately seeking.

I think it is safe to say that there are all different types of ladies that want to be a SB. There are also many different type of men that want to be SD's.

Men:

1. You have the very rich man that wants to completely control a woman by (stealing from London) having her quit her job, stay home, pay all her bills and make her completely dependent on him for anything and everything she wants. She will be at his disposal and when he is done with her, she will be older, unemployed and feel like a piece of shit. IMHO, that is the worst kind of SD/SB relationship there is.

2. You have the non-very rich man that wants a nice young girl to spend time with every once in a while. Not a full time thing, Not a completely dependent situation, Not a take home to your parents thing. He will seek out women that work, but struggling. Maybe college girls that need help with tuition or that extra money for shoes, whatever it might be.

Both are considered a Sugardaddy

Women:

1. You have women that want the world handed to them on a silver platter. They want all the expensive gifts, they want to do nothing but shop on the mans black amex all day and eat brunch with their girlfriends. They will pretend to like the man and fuck him silly when they are together but really she just wants the money so she can go shopping again tomorrow. This is the women that I would never ever be caught dead with.

2. You have the woman that has never had anything of value in her life. She grew up in a non-rich household, she has a 7 year old car and lives in a apartment. She desires to be able to afford a newer car and move into a slightly nicer place to live. She wants to go back to college to raiser her value as a person. But she can't do any of that on her salary right now. She seeks out a SD to assist her with her problems, help mentor her on life's issues, help her enroll in school, etc. She doesn't need $10,000 a month, just a helping hand. These are the girls that I'm attracted too. Not the gold diggers.

Both are considered a Sugarbaby.

To be honest I have "helped" out many women in the past that were stay at home moms, completely dependent on their husbands (see example 1 above) and then the husband decided they wanted to divorce. Now the woman is unemployed, two kids to raise, no help, no money, they didn't know how to pay the rent so they seeked out a SD to help them get back on their feet. They didn't want $10,000 a month (sorry London). They just wanted to know that they had food for the kids, a roof over their head and gas in the car. These relationships work best for me. I know in my heart that I'm actually helping a person and not just throwing money into the bank account of Saks, Neiman's and Barney's.

My personal beliefs as a person; ethically, morally and just as an overall sense of my well being inside is that I want to help and assist people in the world. I give money to various charities yearly. Mostly St. Judes, Make a wish, Goodwill, Red Cross and locally the Star of Hope homeless shelter. I spend my Thanksgiving and Christmas Eve's serving food at the Star of Hope. I host an annual blood drive every year on October 29th in remembrance of a friend that died in a car accident. For the past 3 years at Valentines day I have anonymously sent 10 dozen roses to 2 different women's shelters. I do all this because I want to help people of all backgrounds and situations.

So it pisses me off when someone says "A sugardaddy is someone that spends absorbent amounts of money on a woman". I don't think there is a woman on the planet that is worth $10k a month part time. But I'd love to help 5 women get back on their feet at $2000 a month.

Ok, my rant is over. Back to the normally scheduled program.

LR,

You're hot, smart and being a little rigid I think.

I see 20 definitions for Sugar Daddy here: http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...rm=sugar+daddy

All that matters in a term is what is commonly being communicated by it and this one varies a lot in practice. Anything from May/December relationship to a provider's regular I think.

Actually I suspect the most common meaning is a fairly complex combination of the following things...

1. Baby mainly brings attractiveness and charm to the table (offering little in terms of devotion or financial resources of her own), Daddy mainly brings financial resources (often offered in lieu of the more traditional attractiveness, charm, emotional availability or willingness to commit).
2. Non-committal sex
3. Some ambiguity/less explicitness in terms allowing the illusion of greater legitimacy than straight p4p.
4. More time spent out of bed than traditional p4p.
5. More of a retainer relationship than a transactional/hourly one
6. Some degree of exclusivity/availability

Personally, your extreme wholly exclusive premium priced definition sounds like a terrible deal to me. More expensive than a marriage, you get less out of it and all you get in return is a theoretically easy exit.

But it fits her needs, if she can find a rich idiot that will do that then so be it.

But jumping on our shit for what we do is a bit odd.

She needs $10,000 a month.

I have $3000 a month to spend. I go looking for someone else.

That's just it boys...was not jumping on your sh*t. As JAD and Jack said, it's in the eye of the beholder. To ME, none here would ever be a SD in my world...that's just the way it is. To others, you may be just that. If these women think you are like "Captain save a broke ho" and you get hot, young azz for peanuts...carry on brothers! I can't hate on that I guess.

Irishlad, what makes you "think" you get more non bcd time? I only charge a premium rate to my gents ONCE....after that, most all of them are hanging out with me for nothing and only pay for sex. The meet and greet I am having in New Orleans this weekend is ALL paid for by me...they don't need a dime.

Here's where I get confused though...you are ALL here on Eccie with reviews of providers?? I thought they were too expensive? Losing me now.

They save so much money on SB's that they have to spend it somewhere else :-)

Here's where I get confused though...you are ALL here on Eccie with reviews of providers?? I thought they were too expensive? Losing me now. Originally Posted by London Rayne

After reading all of this, I have come to one conclusion........hooking is too much like work......ijs. Originally Posted by dearhunter

I thought it was work...for some.

It's only work if you let it become that way, and try and do too much for a dollar. I work every "other" week and travel to do it. I see 2 or 3 new places each time I go, and it's fun!

When I first started, that was not the case. I was at a much lower rate and had to see twice as many guys as I do now to make what I need...it was exhausting, and yes WORK. Balance is key in anything you do, including this.

IF you turn 360 degrees, you're still headed in the same direction.

Well yea...