Back on topic, lusty. What is your take on my response to that post?
Does it matter which publication the reporter worked for? If not, then that would be a statement on the importance of literacy.
If so, then you should be concerned.
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
Meaning what? Are you saying WaPo is a literate or illiterate publication? What's your point?
Look, we have to respond if only symbolically. But I am VERY uncomfortable with Americans saying "MBS should go" or sticking our noses into their palace intrigues. You can't complain about Russia interfering in our politics, then turn around and interfere in someone else's. Well ok... I guess you can if you're a Democrat and don't care about principles or rules and the need to be consistent about them.
We can impose some sanctions, then let the Saudis figure out who the fall guy is. I would be wary of doing anything to destabilize the regime. When in the Middle East has that turned out well? Iran when we pushed out the Shah? Iraq when we got rid of Saddam? Libya when we chased down Qaddafi? Syria after odumbo said "Assad must go"? Didn't we learn from those mistakes? Every time we promote change in the Arab world, it backfires and we wind up with something much, much worse.
In Saudi Arabia the stakes are much higher too. As much as you may dislike some of their medieval Bedouin habits, they are an ally and a crucial world energy supplier. And they have been ever since February 14, 1945. That's the day FDR met ibn Saud on the deck of the USS Quincy and cemented our friendship. Read this and learn:
https://www.ouramazingworld.org/uplo...ssue2_2005.pdf