Still More Fake News To Slur A Deceased President.

themystic's Avatar
So you're still cheer leading for the writer of a FAKE NEWS story denigrating a dead man's dog.



It's evident you shouldn't be listening to the people you are listening to, because once again, you're seriously misinformed. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
I confirmed that the author of the story was neither a PETA member nor vegan. Once again, you don't know what you are talking about. You're not from America are you?
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 12-07-2018, 09:23 AM

The author of the FAKE NEWS article in Slate had no personal knowledge of either Bush41 or Sully. Hence, s/he be the bitch that was projecting bullshit to slur Bush41.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
What is fake about what Slate reported? I love my pets, don't get me wrong but there is a difference between one I've had for six months and one I have had for 20 years.



But Sully is not a longtime Bush family pet, letting go of the only master he has known. He is an employee who served for less than six months.



.
I B Hankering's Avatar
What is fake about what Slate reported? I love my pets, don't get me wrong but there is a difference between one I've had for six months and one I have had for 20 years.

But Sully is not a longtime Bush family pet, letting go of the only master he has known. He is an employee who served for less than six months.
Originally Posted by WTF
Slate's FAKE NEWS story is fake news because it was written with no personal knowledge of either Bush41 or Sully. Meanwhile, the picture depicted in no manner shows Bush41 mourning the loss of a dog, but rather depicts a loyal dog laying by the casket of his master of 3.5 years (dog years, that is).


I confirmed that the author of the story was neither a PETA member nor vegan. Once again, you don't know what you are talking about. You're not from America are you? Originally Posted by themystic
You would have cited your evidence had you done so. Meanwhile, my projections about the FAKE NEWS author remain more valid than the author's projections about Bush41 and Sully.
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 12-07-2018, 11:14 AM
Slate's FAKE NEWS story is fake news because it was written with no personal knowledge of either Bush41 or Sully. Meanwhile, the picture depicted in no manner shows Bush41 mourning the loss of a dog, but rather depicts a loyal dog laying by the casket of his master of 3.5 years (dog years, that is). [/COLOR][/SIZE] Originally Posted by I B Hankering
3.5 dog years! Good one IB!

It was a trained service dog that he had for 6 months, evidently you wanted Slate to interview the god damn dog....otherwise it is fake news!
I B Hankering's Avatar
3.5 dog years! Good one IB!

It was a trained service dog that he had for 6 months, evidently you wanted Slate to interview the god damn dog....otherwise it is fake news! Originally Posted by WTF
What about interviewing a surviving family member? Wouldn't that have been better than writing and publishing a FAKE NEWS story? Actually interviewing someone is journalism. Sitting on your ass behind a key board and creating fiction, well, that's FAKE NEWS.
themystic's Avatar
What about interviewing a surviving family member? Wouldn't that have been better than writing and publishing a FAKE NEWS story? Actually interviewing someone is journalism.
Sitting on your ass behind a key board and creating fiction, well, that's FAKE NEWS.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
IB somewhere in the world its close to bed time. I hope your in that part of the world. You don't know your stuff. You spit Fake News all day. Btw Fuck Sully and Tump. Sully tried to take 41s spotlight and Tump dissed 41s 1000 points of light. Hopefully the grocers will properly honor him
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 12-07-2018, 12:04 PM
What about interviewing a surviving family member? Wouldn't that have been better than writing and publishing a FAKE NEWS story? Actually interviewing someone is journalism.
Sitting on your ass behind a key board and creating fiction, well, that's FAKE NEWS.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Yes that would have been befitting, "Jeb , How was the relationship between Sully and your father? "

You are coming up with some crazy ass shit. It was a service dog , laying down. You're wanting to read to much onto it.
I B Hankering's Avatar
IB somewhere in the world its close to bed time. I hope your in that part of the world. You don't know your stuff. You spit Fake News all day. Btw Fuck Sully and Tump. Sully tried to take 41s spotlight and Tump dissed 41s 1000 points of light. Hopefully the grocers will properly honor him Originally Posted by themystic
Actually, it's lib-retards in the lame-stream media that slurred Bush41 with FAKE NEWS. They no longer actually do journalism. They just make things up for their minions to swallow and regurgitate on command. It's a person of extremely low character that would attack a dead man's dog. Same goes for someone who defends such a despicable person.


Yes that would have been befitting, "Jeb , How was the relationship between Sully and your father? "

You are coming up with some crazy ass shit. It was a service dog , laying down. You're wanting to read to much onto it.
Originally Posted by WTF

Interview someone who knows something about the subject or don't write anything at all. Making shit up to slur a dead man is lower than snake shit.
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 12-07-2018, 05:11 PM




Interview someone who knows something about the subject or don't write anything at all. Making shit up to slur a dead man is lower than snake shit.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
He researched that Bush only had the dog for 6 months and it is a loaner dog who will soon be off to another job , unless of course you have interviewed Sully and he told you he was to sad to move on to another job!
themystic's Avatar
He researched that Bush only had the dog for 6 months and it is a loaner dog who will soon be off to another job , unless of course you have interviewed Sully and he told you he was to sad to move on to another job! Originally Posted by WTF
Sully said in an interview that 41 had asked him to keep living and to take a new assignment. 41 would have wanted it that way. Sully is a true American hero. I think he’s working on a book and movie deal
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 12-07-2018, 05:44 PM
We know IB will be the first in line to buy Sully's book!
I B Hankering's Avatar
He researched that Bush only had the dog for 6 months and it is a loaner dog who will soon be off to another job , unless of course you have interviewed Sully and he told you he was to sad to move on to another job! Originally Posted by WTF
Service dogs are not loaner dogs. Such dogs belong to each veteran concerned until s/he or the animal dies. To argue otherwise is to engage in the same FAKE NEWS rubbish such as was originally published in Slate by a lib-retard who wanted to denigrate a deceased president's bond with his dog.
bamscram's Avatar
Sully said in an interview that 41 had asked him to keep living and to take a new assignment. 41 would have wanted it that way. Sully is a true American hero. I think he’s working on a book and movie deal Originally Posted by themystic
I do look for a made for TV movie at the very least. Probably on the Hallmark Channel.

The premis will be how Sully coped with loosing the best gig a support animal ever had, being a hired friend to a dying President.

There's no way to go from there but down.
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 12-07-2018, 06:49 PM
Service dogs are not loaner dogs. Such dogs belong to each veteran concerned until s/he or the animal dies. To argue otherwise is to engage in the same FAKE NEWS rubbish such as was originally published in Slate by a lib-retard who wanted to denigrate a deceased president's bond with his dog. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Yea....when the people that loan you a dog until you die and then get the dog back....that is called a loaner dog.

If not a loaner dog, the deceased persons family could then in fact just keep the dog.

Are you saying that it is up to the deceased family option whether to give this trained service dog back?