Can you agree the WSJ piece doesn’t pass the sniff text and is fake? Originally Posted by Green_MountainLol. If it was fake, trump wouldn't have personally called the WSJ and tried to get the story pulled. Why else would he have personally called them?
Sadly, the testimony they are asking to release is still only a small fraction of overall file.Basically, trump's only going to release the parts where his name isn't mentioned. This will work on his dumbass cult, but anyone with half a brain will need to see more before they are satisfied.
The attempt at appeasement is clear. More goading and sinking polls will be necessary Originally Posted by HDGristle
Basically, trump's only going to release the parts where his name isn't mentioned. This will work on his dumbass cult, but anyone with half a brain will need to see more before they are satisfied.So Biden and Kamala had access to these same Epstein files that you are insinuating show Trump in a guilty light and didn’t release the files?
Release the entirety of the files or STFU, trump. Originally Posted by tommy156
If Trump is guilty and there is evidence in the Epstein files, why did Biden and Kamala not release them?Likely there is more damaging information on MORE than just Donnie or Doucheowitz. I'm sure there are likely Dems too caught up in this and a whole lot of favoritism and blind eye turning to sicken the entire country - on both sides. Perhaps that alone or there are some folks that have yet to even be considered or brought up.
It’s not a hard question. But you won’t answer bc you’ve painted yourself into a corner. Again. Originally Posted by Green_Mountain
They'd also burn the American flag and chant "death to America" if he commanded them to do so. Originally Posted by tommy156You do realize this is the Democratic Party you just described? With of course no order necessary from 47.