I'm sorry that I just stumbled onto this thread because it disturbs me greatly to see, in person, how the conspiratorial circles can totally convince some people into accepting their views. I fear Mr. Bill believes in the grassy knoll gunman and that Bush was the true 9/11 mastermind. I wish I could have taken him with me a couple years ago during my participation in a sub Saharan medical mission. A single day (hell, an hour) in one of those clinics would have been more than enough to alter his belief that there is no link between HIV and AIDS. It is also very disappointing to put in years of hard dedicated effort and work toward my profession, yet still have people believe that my sole driving force is to make sure I do the bidding of the pharmaceutical companies (who, by the way, have never offerred me even one penny to use their products. . . But Mr. Bill will automatically presume that I am just blatantly lying when I make that statement.) Fellow board members, I think we'll just have to accept the fact that no amount of discussion with Mr. Bill has any chance of changing his views and be comfortable in the knowledge that the VAST majority of people who come in contact with persons of his ilk have the common sense to discount or ignore his rantings.
Originally Posted by femurman2003
How dare you exalt yourself in the spirit of a caring, responsible medical professional. You're only parroting the same tired, old party line that HIV causes AIDS. What proof do you have? What proof does any doctor have? None. They take their cue from pharmaceutical sales literature, peer reviewed published journals, and the CDC. And that's it. Everyone's just passing around the same misinformation.
There are two sides to every story and if you look back through this thread, you'll see that anything opposing the unproven HIV/AIDS theory is dismissed out of hand without ever reviewing the information provided. How the hell can you ever develop an objective view if you don't inspect all the data? You can't. You are only a hypnotized, brain washed mockingbird singing the same tune in consensus.
The difference between myself and your brothers in crime is I've taken the time to review ALL THE DATA from both sides of the HIV/AIDS controversy ...and the evidence is heavily weighted against HIV being the cause of AIDS.
Your sub Saharan adventure, if it took place at all, was a misguided public relations tour.
Did you know that anyone with African heritage can test positive for HIV anti-bodies?
Are you aware that indigenous Africans are classified as having AIDS simply because they're starving?
Did you know that the historical, naturally occurring diseases that have affected Africans for millennia are today re-classified as AIDS?
And did you know that symptoms and illnesses that have always been associated with the mining industry are now conveniently called AIDS to escape the liabilities which would bankrupt the mining cartels?
Are you even aware of what the antiretroviral AIDS drugs are, where they came from, or what they do to the human body, especially to a person whose immune system has already been compromised by starvation or disease?
You can say anything you want and profess to be anybody here on this board ...though unless you are willing to provide your real name, your credentials, photographs and other pertinent information, your accounts here are only unsubstantiated bullshit.
.