A question of pricing etiquette...

anita is a good person nice, ms elisabeth is too, everyone should just try and get along, too much fighting lately over nothing. peace and love time

any chance i can get you two together with me, sounds fun. im down. mods lets get this patched up,, by the way for the record, ms e pointing out the open sores on the dude is a good thing to do, thats good provider process, and that has to continue.

as for the men who are just cheap, low life bastards who have no choice but to pay to play, they can fuck right off then die in a fire.
Originally Posted by ms_elizabeth

Really?




elg.....

Okay, so this might not have that much to do with this post, but I'm beginning to think that this Ryleigh, whether real or fiction, is a master strategist and business women. Within the last couple of weeks or so, I have seen conversation and interest explode for both her and her friend Elise.....(myself included). I hate to say it, but now I feel I really need to meet this girl, overpriced or not. Although common sense is telling me otherwise, there is a gnawing curiosity and fascination with this girl. Ryleigh....here is your pitch, why should I come and see you.............(besides your big titties)?

thats a different thread but elise is hor right now. shes seeing a lot of traffic lately, but looks good.

as for the men who are just cheap, low life bastards who have no choice but to pay to play, they can fuck right off then die in a fire. Originally Posted by ms_elizabeth

Originally Posted by GP

Summed up perfectly, GP.


elg......

As a Provider, I find it terribly insulting when someone tries to negotiate my Donation amounts. I understand that some people feel they are to high. There are other choices in their price range.
If Ryleigh, whom is just starting out, is asking for a Donation which is unjustified by what she has to offer, she will quickly realize it (hopefully ;-) ) when she fails to book appts, and make the appropriate adjustments.
It seems that she does not seem willing to do that at this point. You have approached the subject, and her response was vague, and for the most part did not answer your question.
I think you should entertain other options, and maybe at some point Ryleigh, will have restructured her business.

ur an ass!

Nobody wants a dissertation here unless your a hot provider. And dude, you not the only college educated member, though I would ask you to show your diploma, as you appear to be unteachable.

We are all equals here!

Hi Anita,

You ask some very good and valid questions. I will gladly address them for you:

1. You are correct, I do have strong opinions about folks I have yet to even met. I have however spent time reading through a large quantity of threads in addition to the ones I have started or replied in and so far what I have been told and who I have been told it about has matched up perfectly in terms of behavior, attitudes, and general demeanor.

2. You are also correct that this information has been solely in PM's I have received.

3. As someone whose educational and experiential background is the clinical social sciences and designs and conducts behavioral research studies - yes, it did indeed occur to me after the first PM containing information and opinions about certain people that the sender might have some sort of personal agenda. It also occurred to me after the second and after the third. After the fourth, and the fifth, and the sixth, and so on, and what I had read for myself it became clear that what I was being told was credible. I'm not one inclined towards conspiracies, but even if all these people were working in concert towards some common agenda against other members and/or providers that wouldn't change the fact that what I was seeing - and now experiencing - for myself from the people I was being told about is congruent with what I was being told.

So, that said my question for you would be have you stopped to think that these folks who are suggesting I am a shill for a provider or even that provider herself, a provider whom none of them seemingly have or do patronize and openly mock and/or disparage, have their own agenda of some sort, possibly related to another provider whom they are all in good favor with, whether it is with her involvement or not?

If you are objective, impartial, and unbiased I would think your answer couldn't be anything but a "yes".

It is obvious that there is some degree of animosity between two providers on this site. It is also obvious that these two providers cater towards a different type of clientele with little, if any overlap. It is further obvious that one of these provider's client base is a vocal minority on this site and another is a silent majority with little interaction and overlap between the two, if at all. Both of these providers were recommended to me, some even by the same people. Miss Elizabeth was the overwhelming recommendation, almost four-to-one over Nikki. The only people who seem to be taking issue with me are the people who are open and unabashed in their support for Nikki. If it isn't obvious to you what is really going on, especially with the people implying that I am here to shill for Miss Elizabeth or that I am actually her then I can probably assume with a decent degree of accuracy that you yourself have some sort of personal agenda which is hostile towards Miss Elizabeth. Originally Posted by FREEATLAST

I would love to spend some non-negotiable time with you!

Do you ever make it down 90 and hold court?

As a Provider, I find it terribly insulting when someone tries to negotiate my Donation amounts. . Originally Posted by AlbanyBlonde

I want to watch this flick, anyone got a copy?

Originally Posted by GP

LMAO...Methinks I smell a wolf in sheeps clothing.
Who is the masked man in the FREEATLAST costume?

I want to watch this flick, anyone got a copy? Originally Posted by lostforkate

http://www.1channel.ch/watch-135073-...h-class-hooker

Who is the masked man in the FREEATLAST costume? Originally Posted by Perfect Gentleman

thats one of mz elizabats clients