AlexandriaSquirtz & Amber Rain?

It is way past time for this cat fight to stop. If you absolutely can not contain yourselves then take it private.

This is sounding like 2 year olds. I think I just insulted the actual 2 year olds.

Torito

They need to kiss and make up, and we want to watch...

It is way past time for this cat fight to stop. If you absolutely can not contain yourselves then take it private.

This is sounding like 2 year olds. I think I just insulted the actual 2 year olds.

Torito Originally Posted by Torito

torito, thx for the comment.


Originally Posted by pmdelites
amber and brandee, please take the back & forth private.
or start a new thread.

Originally Posted by brandee69
Are u a mod???????

brandee, nope, and i dont play one on TV either.
just thought the sidebar [what torito called a cat fight] should move elsewhere cos there are better places for that conversation than in this thread.

Or Pmdelites u can chose to not come into this thread and participate right?

I always see you putting your little 2 cents in well ur joining in for what i see

Im done here! Have a great evening!

This needs to end here. And it does not need to continue on another thread on this site. An attempt was made to avoid awarding any points. That attempt failed.

Continuation will result in more.

Why don't ALL of us just let this die out and drift away. It serves no purpose.

Torito

torito, thx for the comment.
Originally Posted by pmdelites
amber and brandee, please take the back & forth private.
or start a new thread.
Originally Posted by brandee69
Are u a mod???????
brandee, nope, and i dont play one on TV either.
just thought the sidebar [what torito called a cat fight] should move elsewhere cos there are better places for that conversation than in this thread. Originally Posted by pmdelites

Building on PMD's comments, sometimes a few of us will come on here and make some suggestions. I have been guilty of this many times. I am not a mod, can't afford the bump in income into a higher tax bracket - Obama would tax me to death.

When we make these suggestions, it is because we hope to prevent you from either earning some points, a vacation, or destroying your dang reputation around here. But many of you don't have any worries about your reputation.

I know a lot of people use a combination of the following marketing techniques:

There is a sucker born every minute.

Any publicity is good publicity.

You can fool all of the people some of the time and some of the people all of the time.

However, when I see someone using one or more of those marketing techniques, they reach elite status on my DNS list. Certain handles reach this status all on their own, others by association with elite status DNS members. Not trying to start an argument here, just trying to explain the outcome of certain behaviors.

But, in a market like the DFW area, I guess that does not prevent a lady with a questionable reputation from making a good living. More power to you I guess.

As far as the threAD aspects of this, I figure about 50% of the time ladies post outside of the Ad forum it is a threAD. There are a few exceptions, I could point out those ladies who really discuss world topics with us, but that probably would just piss someone else off and start another firestorm.

EDIT: Sorry Torito, I was typing my answer right after PMD's last post. I am a slow typist, 4 replies including yours before I finished my dissertation.

The combatants really should post some taint. How else can a winner be declared?

If a train leaves Dallas at 5:22 on a Tuesday, heading toward Fort Worth at 31mph, and another train leaves Fort Worth at 6:02, heading for Dallas going 26 mph... at what time do they become a burning pile of insults and slander in the mid-cities?


At least I wasn't involved in this one...

I just checked the first post of this thread. For all who have forgotten, this is it:

So I want to know how many of U guys would be interested if Amber Rain & myself may happen to decide to team up on U???


Anything else is off track.

Torito

I just checked the first post of this thread. For all who have forgotten, this is it:

So I want to know how many of U guys would be interested if Amber Rain & myself may happen to decide to team up on U???


Anything else is off track.

Torito Originally Posted by Torito

Sorry Torito but according to another mod in a different thread that is not correct..

as per Duke "It's not a hijack. It's called "a discussion." Not all posts on a thread will directly relate to the original post. Threads have a flow."

then again as per Duke "pointing out facts or fallacies isn't a hijack. Nor is replying to a post prior in the thread. "
I have no dog in this fight just wondering why being able to steer away from the original OP's question is a hijack in one thread but in another its just a "FLOW OF DISCUSSION"...

To hijack, or not to hijack? That is the question.

Not threADs. Not cat fights. Not anatomy/physiology lessons. Not pissing/squirting can truly meet our needs, fellow boardians. What we need now, is a full-on discussion of taint.

Ok Pyramider, go ahead.

Sorry Torito but according to another mod in a different thread that is not correct..

as per Duke "It's not a hijack. It's called "a discussion." Not all posts on a thread will directly relate to the original post. Threads have a flow."

then again as per Duke "pointing out facts or fallacies isn't a hijack. Nor is replying to a post prior in the thread. "
I have no dog in this fight just wondering why being able to steer away from the original OP's question is a hijack in one thread but in another its just a "FLOW OF DISCUSSION"... Originally Posted by Texasquest

Why, Texasquest? Because THIS thread became about two providers trading insults, with no relevance to ANY discussion. Torito was providing guidance on not continuing that particular type of post.

The OTHER thread had a discussion about ISO usage in addition to the OP's question of "how do guys make decisions in ISO?"

So, quote me all you like. It's still accurate, and it's still consistent. The threads are different.

So unless every post about taint, or "+1" or other info that doesn't directly relate to an OP should be pointed, you are attempting to too strictly interpret a "hijack" to suit the fact that you don't like or agree with a given poster.

In attempting to not be to "heavy handed" we don't force members to always directly include replies to the OP. On the other hand, insult exchanges like that seen here will also not be allowed.

Also, your questions on "what is a hijack" might better be answered in a "questions for staff" thread of your own, rather than on multiple threads following the drama around.

Sorry Duke but in an earlier thread you stated it was perfectly fine to respond to another post in a thread even if the first post had no relevance to the original OP's question. You said that threads could change and evolve from the original subject. Now your saying something different. One could take this as it depends on who is posting and who isn't. I dunno does it mean that if a certain clique derails a thread and causes drama it's OK. as that's just the "Flow of a thread". But if people outside of that circle do it then it's hijacking a thread?? What makes it right for one group and not the rest??