Booji, I'm not trying to determine your opinion about anything. I corrected you about something you read inaccurately, that's all. I read everything about it - before any names were mentioned in the Men's Lounge, His Review, and this thread by Kelsey. I drew my own conclusion that there was ample evidence to pick which side of the fence I wanted to stand on, because being a Perve is one thing, but being physically abusive to someone who has told you to STOP and could not have known the level of what he is really capable of beforehand, well that in my book is UNACCEPTABLE.
Of course there is 'more to the story', we weren't there !! Duh, I didn't need to know anymore after she said STOP and his review...You make your judgements, I don't care, so don't get all pissy when others want to correct you OR defend your position because you chose to put it out there. The mob didn't make you get involved, you brought this on yourself !! ...Oops, there I go, laying it on thick again.
Originally Posted by ManSlut
Since I was called out for being full of shit let me defend myself a little bit.
I know nether JG or the OP.
Not being allowed to reveal ROS info this will be a little touchy but
there is JGs post on this thread.
Very simple really, when you have two statements about an event
you look for what they have in common (What both parties agree on)
what they have that differs and what you call pivoting factors.
The pivoting factors are things you look for that would lend credibility
to one side or the other. Has to be as objective as possible.
Things they have in common, or agree on.
1 She was shorted $50 dollars and never got it.
2 Rough sex was involved.
3 The session was not good. (But for different reasons stated)
Things they disagree on
Her-She didn't know what he was into.
Him-He told her what he was into and she said she was game
and got her permission first.
Her-She said for him to stop because it was too much for her
and he didn't.
Him-She said for him to stop because it was too much for her
and he did.
Pivoting factors
1 She had a deep concern for the $50 dollars that he shorted
her even after her claim of great abuse and a failure on his part
to stop the abuse after numerous requests on her part for him
to do so, why do I say deep concern. No or what seems like
very little regard for her future safety around him, even asking
him to bring it back right away. Not normal behavior for the
claimed situation.
2 She claims she had no or very little knowledge of the fact
that he liked rough and nothing on his part to let her know
until I guess the session began and then came the surprise.
3 Has this behavior been demonstrated by him before in sessions
with other girls, I know of no other alerts like this one on him.
Is there any other girls that have or would come forward with
the same kind of claims, happening during a session with him.
4 This thread is posted after a no review is given by him but
claims are made that she alerted other providers about the
situation before it was posted.
The question is not whether the rough sex occurred
or even if it was too rough, the question is did he stop when
she asked him to.
Because both agree that it was too rough for her liking, he
claims that he stopped and she claims that he didn't.
She also claims to have pictures and certain other proofs
to back up her side of the story.
Take out the shorting of the $50 dollars and would any of this
have seen the light of day?
Why were the police not called if the level of abuse was such?
And lastly, why would he short her $50 if he got what he wanted?
that would be rather odd on his part and a very important factor
in this situation. Did he know ahead of time that it would make
his story look more credible, because it dose, any lawyer could
tell you that, just seems unlikely on his part to have that much
foresight, has he ever shorted any other providers?
Or was he upset with her objections and that is why he shorted her?
That would seem odd also because he called her and they were
talking about the $50 dollars, not how he beat her ass and she
was going to the police or how he had better not show his
face around there ever again but about the$50 dollars and how
she was going to get it back, $50 freakin dollars and she just
got her ass beat, sorry trying to remain objective here.
I'm not trying to make any judgments here or take any sides.
Just showing in a pretty poor and rusty fashion ( I don't have
any of the statements before me to look at) what I was talking
about in my earlier post.
And I will be the first to say that it is a pretty poor example.
And it also shows that without direct knowledge of the situation
a subjective opinion is what will be demonstrated by most people.