Justin Scott, paging Justin Scott

notanewbie's Avatar
where does SNAP fit in?
boardman's Avatar
I thinck that it depends on the subject of the pronoun ie. "I shitted at her incall" vs "The mods shat all over the tards in Upset"

See the difference?
bbkid's Avatar
  • bbkid
  • 04-22-2013, 02:39 PM
Uh, I think I got it. I think.
dearhunter's Avatar
Oh SNAP!
Jusanotherdude's Avatar
Why do you care what wakeup thinks?

One mans opinion that others probably agree with........wakeup is a textbook internet bully that is out of control and the mods don't give a shit. Because he's 'wakeup', he's given way too much leniency with this conduct on this board. I'm sick and tired of him calling the ladies 'whores', etc.

Why the mods don't send him a pm stating something like 'enough is enough with the attitude' is beyond me.

In all due respect to the mods, if you're thinking about sending me a pm, forget it, I've wanted to post this for years and you won't change my mind. Like I said, it's one mans opinion.

So just put him on ignore, he ain't shit around here, but then again, neither am I. However I try to add to the board, not take away from it. Originally Posted by DEAR_JOHN
Well..... for one... what makes you think we haven't? What makes you think we haven't pointed him/Warned him or pointed him only to have them reversed? Things that are not known because they are not apparent to the average member. We (Mods) do not make decisions on how to run the board. We are members just like anyone else with just a few extra responsibilities in regards to helping enforce and apply the rules. The interpretation of the rules is not up to us alone, and in fact we are merely one of the first lines of interpretation... we adhere to, and follow the interpretations of said rules/guidelines that the admins and owners give us and show how they want us to interpret them. That's all. Apparently the owners have no issues with Hobbyist calling Providers "Whores" and some of the other things you personally (and many others I might add) find to be offensive... that is not on the Mod staff to place judgement on I'm afraid....

The underlying feeling that I get and the trend I see from admins and ownership, is the want for unfiltered freedom of speech in most regards so long as they adhere to the guidelines. Opinions are wanted and welcomed, even unfavorable ones at times..... Your opinion of WU and others like him is more than welcome, just as his opinions on things are generally welcomed as well.... From what I gather, from the owners perspective you can't have one without having the other......

Hope that helps.....




P.S.
for the record.... you can trust me when I say that there isn't a Mod on this board who isn't waiting in line to be the one to ban Wakeup..... Myself and ALL of the Houston Mods included.....You can absolutely take that to the bank.
I guess you were right JaD...

Your explanation was much better than me telling everyone to fucking deal with it and just put that asshole on ignore.




Touché my good man!
Dorian Gray's Avatar
Eloquent writing/dissemination of information like JaD's doesn't come from an HISD education.
TransAm's Avatar
Well..... for one... what makes you think we haven't? What makes you think we haven't pointed him/Warned him or pointed him only to have them reversed? Things that are not known because they are not apparent to the average member. We (Mods) do not make decisions on how to run the board. We are members just like anyone else with just a few extra responsibilities in regards to helping enforce and apply the rules. The interpretation of the rules is not up to us alone, and in fact we are merely one of the first lines of interpretation... we adhere to, and follow the interpretations of said rules/guidelines that the admins and owners give us and show how they want us to interpret them. That's all. Apparently the owners have no issues with Hobbyist calling Providers "Whores" and some of the other things you personally (and many others I might add) find to be offensive... that is not on the Mod staff to place judgement on I'm afraid....

The underlying feeling that I get and the trend I see from admins and ownership, is the want for unfiltered freedom of speech in most regards so long as they adhere to the guidelines. Opinions are wanted and welcomed, even unfavorable ones at times..... Your opinion of WU and others like him is more than welcome, just as his opinions on things are generally welcomed as well.... From what I gather, from the owners perspective you can't have one without having the other......

Hope that helps.....




P.S.
for the record.... you can trust me when I say that there isn't a Mod on this board who isn't waiting in line to be the one to ban Wakeup..... Myself and ALL of the Houston Mods included.....You can absolutely take that to the bank. Originally Posted by Jusanotherdude
Thanks for the info, JAD, it is appreciated. So I guess we can take from this that, WU's protests to the contrary, he IS in fact protected from on high, by the Prince of Darkness himself. Good to know.
Jusanotherdude's Avatar
Eloquent writing/dissemination of information like JaD's doesn't come from an HISD education. Originally Posted by Dorian Gray
Thanks for the info, JAD, it is appreciated. So I guess we can take from this that, WU's protests to the contrary, he IS in fact protected from on high, by the Prince of Darkness himself. Good to know. Originally Posted by TransAm
I can neither confirm nor deny either of the above stated...... ijs.....
Wakeup's Avatar
boardman's Avatar
I guess you were right JaD...

Your explanation was much better than me telling everyone to fucking deal with it and just put that asshole on ignore.




Touché my good man! Originally Posted by DickEmDown
The Dude is cool like that, it comes from his background as a cat...ijs
dearhunter's Avatar
Why would anyone want to ban wakeup?
BatteriesNotIncluded's Avatar
Why would anyone want to ban wakeup? Originally Posted by dearhunter

Right? There are always people who test limits. Without them you have a murky grayness You need flat on both sides of the spectrum to point you towards the middle.
Sarunga's Avatar
Sarunga - The reason why I put him separate is because he is not your typical flamer. He backs up his words with links, facts, and is very good at using the rules against you to the point that he comes out clean and you go over the edge. By all means, ignore him, if you feel that is the right decision. In you prefer, call him out if you can. Just be prepared when you do. He had a separate section because most can not seem to ignore him AND the vast majority that decide to go head to head with him get destroyed because they do not think before they post. Ironically, you seem to post after Wakeup in many threads and have yet to be effective in "shutting him down with facts". Based in that alone, I would recommend either to ignore him or change your tactics as your current ones do not seem to phase him in the least. I hope that clarifies for you sir. Originally Posted by Adabear
You are fucking kidding me, right?

I could have sworn there was a thread...somewhere....where, some of us were making...one "profound" guess...after another....trying to figure out the facts....waiting for your idol to enlighten us.

In fact, if my memory serves me well...we are STILL waiting.
lesbianbob's Avatar
I don't want anyone banned, I like the humor of a lot of the post by some of the most offensive members here. I was just asking, why we as a group of men, can't be gentlemen in the public areas, and act like the childish animals many of us are in the private forums. In my country club the mens lounge is a place for the members to sit around with no dress code or code of conduct for the most part. We drink, we smoke cigars, we use offensive language, and then we walk out to be around the women and children, and the rude behavior is left in the back room.
I know it would take so many more people that hold the same opinion that I do for any thing to change.
It looks like I am in the minority, and thats fine. I will take my turns, and state my case when I can.

Thanks Jad, and Ded for the information.