SHE FINALY DID IT. LOLABREA's MEW SHOWCASE

this shit cracks me up. isn't this the way it always ends up??? lolabrea and bitchtits are no where to be found, and the bk/wk however you view it are duking it out...classic shit here. Originally Posted by fletch

and it cracks me up when the GK jumps in, because they really aren't a GK, but they desperately want everyone to think they are. Good job.

No Fletch I just take offense to my words or opinion being mistaken for a WK or some kind of fucking puppet .
I simply stated that nowhere did Lola threaten to out BT plain and simple Originally Posted by pwood

pwood got no beef with you or anyone else posting on the thread...just pointing out that dudes are bashing each other over and over because of two hookers (never seen either of them)...i totally agree the fucking sock puppet, pussy whipped dumb shits far outnumber most legitmate posters here.

hope you didn't take offense to my comment

and it cracks me up when the GK jumps in, because they really aren't a GK, but they desperately want everyone to think they are. Good job. Originally Posted by Jarvis

way to go jarvis you have me all figured out. just like everything else.

i am far from a gk

Can I make it any clearer? Originally Posted by ExNYer

doubtful.

Here's what I have. Lola got pushed around enough to force her to push back. Now Lola has the upper hand and BT is scared shitless. Now BT is crying rules/timeout and enlisted some guy who she doesn't know to defend her. And that would be you.

That's as clear as I need. Later dude. Hope ya get a free BT session out of it.

way to go jarvis you have me all figured out. just like everything else. Originally Posted by fletch

it wasn't difficult.

Fletch
Never took your words personal

No Fletch I just take offense to my words or opinion being mistaken for a WK or some kind of fucking puppet .
I simply stated that nowhere did Lola threaten to out BT plain and simple Originally Posted by pwood

Then you need to re-read (or read for the first time) Post #75 where Lola wrote:

"Guys beware this chick has 2 reports on her.... one of her recording a session and threatening to release them! (have the link if you would like for proof)"

Is that plain and simple enough?

I have read it sounds alert worthy not outing!

Bottom line is she has been rude to just about everyone she has come in contact with on ECCIE and yet here you are acting as if she is a victim and everyone else are WK's and outers!

This thread began as a compliment to Lola's showcase and due to BTs it has turned into this bowl of shit!

I would have never chimed in as Lola can handle her own if you did not come to the aid of the problem child and somehow deducing an outing from Lola's post

doubtful.

Here's what I have. Lola got pushed around enough to force her to push back. Now Lola has the upper hand and BT is scared shitless. Now BT is crying rules/timeout and enlisted some guy who she doesn't know to defend her. And that would be you.

That's as clear as I need. Later dude. Hope ya get a free BT session out of it. Originally Posted by Jarvis

Thanks for clarifying that threats to out someone are OK by you. It's just "pushing back", right? Better hope no provider ever gets mad at you and decides to "push back".

And you STILL can't read. I made it clear that I knew BT and spoke to her. And yet you wrote that BT was "enlisting some guy who she doesn't know". What??

And BT never mentioned anything about "the rules". I mentioned the rules about not outing people.

And she didn't "enlist" me. The last time we spoke was before this thread was even posted.

I only noticed this shitstorm when I opened thread to see the pictures. And I only commented because Lola was threatening to out her.

Drunk lola eating popcorn reading about the Pillsbury dough boys yeast infection in star magazine. ... marketing too easy to throw chum at sharks..... whose exny? Lol moving onto corona 5 and next apt...... Must have struck some cords. ... be back in two hours....

I have read it sounds alert worthy not outing! Originally Posted by pwood

Bottom line is she has been rude to just about everyone she has come in contact with on ECCIE and yet here you are acting as if she is a victim and everyone else are WK's and outers!

This thread began as a compliment to Lola's showcase and due to BTs it has turned into this bowl of shit!

I would have never chimed in as Lola can handle her own if you did not come to the aid of the problem child and somehow deducing an outing from Lola's post Originally Posted by pwood

I don't know how much "deducing" it takes.

Lola said that BT's pictures and personal information were posted elsewhere. And then taunts her by volunteering to post the link.

That sounds like an outing - even under the pretest of an alert.

Then you need to re-read (or read for the first time) Post #75 where Lola wrote:

"Guys beware this chick has 2 reports on her.... one of her recording a session and threatening to release them! (have the link if you would like for proof)"

Is that plain and simple enough? Originally Posted by ExNYer

ExNyer, she is helpfully offering to provide a link to prove that Bitchtits threatened to out someone on another board. She is protecting our fellow mongers from a provider who threatened to out other hobbyists. I commend her for that. Additionally, bitchtits started this whole attack completely unprovoked and with very obvious malice. She deserves to be pointed. Lola Brea does all that we as hobbyists ask, showing her face, showing up on time, providing professional pictures, being transparent and responsible, and you are taking the side of an alleged provider (not verified, no pictures) with very little time or credibility here who is clearly intending to create trouble.

I don't know how much "deducing" it takes.

Lola said that BT's pictures and personal information were posted elsewhere. And then taunts her by volunteering to post the link.

That sounds like an outing - even under the pretest of an alert. Originally Posted by ExNYer

Lola only gave enough information to show she knew who it was, she was "showing proof" that she knew the handle and could disclose the providers pseudonym, not real world info.

Lola only gave enough information to show she knew who it was, she was "showing proof" that she knew the handle and could disclose the providers pseudonym, not real world info. Originally Posted by Jewish Lawyer

Now YOU need to re-read the posts above.

It has been made CLEAR already that the link to the other website contained her real world info.

So Lola was threatening to out her. She wasn't providing any service to hobbyists.

And I don't care WHO started it. There is no justification for outing or threats of it.

Think of all the annoying posts you have made in the Political Forum - deliberately abrasive. Would you be cool with it if Yssup Rider dropped hints about linking to some website where your personal information was posted?

I didn't think so.