Private Major Luke_Wyatt: My offer still stands ass clown did you find a MOD that's a veteran?
First, I asked you the questions first. Until you answer the questions that I have asked you, and follow through the conversation that would naturally result from your answering those questions, you do not have a leg to stand on demanding that I take your offer.
Second, your offer is invalid on the account that we do not know if the moderator that is chosen is a veteran and, if he/she is a veteran, if this moderator is able to scrutinize a DD Form 214. Again, veteran service organizations have veterans who had been fooled by falsified DD Form 214s. What makes you think that a moderator here would not get fooled?
Third, verification of your military service, or military background, is more efficiently done via you answering my questions, and following through with the conversation that will result from the answers that you give me.
Fourth, someone who is allegedly a retired Sergeant Major would most certainly know if something is working or not. In this case, notice how I consistently respond to your demands, to take your offer, with the response I provided you with the first points above. I have also provided you with an explanation as to why your offer is invalid.
You, as a "retired Sergeant Major", would not cower away from answering my initial questions, and from engaging in a veteran to veteran conversation. Real veterans would answer my questions, and engage in the conversation that follows. This is a reason to why real veterans could hit it off and converse with each other as if they'd known each other forever despite the fact that they had just met the first time.
If you are a "retired SGM", you'd know that. You wouldn't be afraid to do things my way, which is consistent with how veterans do things. The fact that you would insist that anybody here accept your offer, while refusing to do what veterans would naturally do, speaks volumes supporting the argument that you are not who you claim to be.
Fifth, a part of your offer is you leaving if your statement is proven invalid via a DD 214 check. Why would I want that? I don't want you to leave, because if you do, you would not be on here making a fool of yourself and proving your own claims, that you are a "retired SGM" false.
Private Major Luke_Wyatt: You are an asshole guy
I could understand why you would call me an "asshole guy"; due to my refusal to stop hammering you, and due to my insistence on you answering simple straightforward questions that a real veteran, or a veteran with nothing to hide, will be able to answer. You see me as "an asshole guy" because I refuse to do what you want me to do. I'm an "asshole guy" because I continue to insist on holding your feet to the fire with questions that real veterans will be glad to answer, but questions that you are afraid to answer. I will keep asking you these questions. The longer you ignore these questions, the more you prove that you never were a retired SGM.
Private Major Luke_Wyatt: who likes ladies to sit on his face
There's a very good chance that if you were to try this, and not speak negatively about this, you would not have even have to worry about whether women would have issues with your weight or not. In fact, your weight would not be an issue if these women knew that not only do you enjoy living up to my username, but were good at it.
Perhaps that's the reason to why I'm hobbying every week, and you're hobbying infrequently.
However, your use of this in a negative sense speaks volumes about your true philosophy about women. What you said, via PM, and here, about my username, tells me that you see women as individuals that should be used, controlled, manipulated, abused, etc. You have no respect for women, and you look down on anyone who would dare two things to go counter to how you would do things.
Be assured that if you were to live up to my username with the women in your area, you would find the aroma far superior to your character, integrity, argument, line of reasoning, honesty, etc.
Private Major Luke_Wyatt: and some how you think you are the stolen valor enforcer of the whore boards.
Where, in any of my posts, have I claimed to be one of those? You, who claim to be a retired SGM, would understand why many of us here are calling your veteran claims to question. If you are a real deal retired SGM, you would gladly answer my questions and engage in the conversation that follows.
The fact that you would accuse me of claiming to be a stolen valor enforcer speaks volumes to the fact that deep down inside, you know that you are a valor thief.
Private Major Luke_Wyatt: I offered you two options look me up in the database in St Louis or present our respective DD 214
False, you only offered one option, which was an invalid method of verifying your service. If you are a retired SGM, you would have noticed that, and would not insist on demanding something in the face of getting the same response repeatedly when it comes to verifying your claims of being a retired SGM.
You did mention that if you were to trust me, I would be able to verify you via looking you up in the database at the National Personal Records Center. That doesn't count as a second option, as there's no guarantee that you'd trust someone that'll constantly hammer you. In response to this offer, I offered a much quicker way of verifying that, via the Army White Pages.
However, even in that statement I could tell that you are not who you claim to be when it comes to be a retired SGM. Because, if you did, you would know that none of us has the ability to check the database, at the national personnel archives, unless we were an employee there. Instead, you'd know that we would have to submit an FOIA request to them. You would also know that depending on when you left service, we would have to send that request to the parent service instead.
This is just more proof that you are not who you claim to be. Unless I can personally verify your DD 214, block by block, your offer is invalid.
Private Major Luke_Wyatt: - last time I checked hookers are not charging half off to bets so it's absurd someone to benefit on a whore site to claim to be a VET.
Nobody is arguing that you did this for discounts, you advanced that claim in an attempt to bolster your position in debate against the other hobbyists in other threads. Unfortunately for you, your line of reasoning betrayed your claims of being a retired SGM. One of the things that got you happens to be one of the common things that gets other phonies, math. Another one is firsthand mundane things that were absent from your line of reasoning and commentary.
Private Major Luke_Wyatt: Everyone here is pretty much anonymous
The mask of anonymity will not hide the fact that you lack the necessary experience that a retired SGM would possess. Consequently, when you make such claims, real veterans are going smell the BS that you spew, spot you as a faker, and call you out accordingly.
Private Major Luke_Wyatt: but some how you think I need to validate myself
Your invalid offer is a method of "validation". What you are saying here is that it is okay for you to demand validation from others, but not okay for others to demand validation from you.
Again, the simple questions I asked you are questions that a real veteran would be able to answer. Additionally, real veterans would be able to carry that into an actual conversation. If you are a real veteran, as you are portraying yourself, you would have no problems doing that. You would not be spending a lot of time complaining that I'm trying to "force you" to validate yourself.
A faker/fraud would go out of his/her way to refuse to answer simple questions like what I have asked you. This is a very similar reason to why other fakers would stop entertaining questioning, regarding their "military service", or their "accomplishments" during military service, with the, "it's classified" card.
Private Major Luke_Wyatt: to a cock sucker like you
Translation: The individual that's forcing Private Major Luken Wyattn to do things that would further expose Private Major Luke Wyatt as NOT being a retired SGM.
Private Major Luke_Wyatt: who I don't know from Adam's house cat?
It doesn't matter. Firsthand experience is firsthand experience. When phonies like you attempt to gain an advantage in an argument, by advancing a phony veteran claim, and subsequently saying things, or calling things, that gives himself away as being a phony, those with real military experience are going to smell the BS coming from you and call you out accordingly.
Private Major Luke_Wyatt: Just like I told you FUCK OFF
The only thing that's getting fucked is your phony veteran persona. Judging by what you are saying, and by your demeanor, I could tell that even you are starting to doubt the ability of your BS, regarding your military background, to stick.
Private Major Luke_Wyatt: or accept my offer
Wrong. I asked you questions first. The onus is on you to answer those questions, and to engage in the conversation that would follow depending on the responses that you give me. Until then, you do not have a leg to stand on to demand that I accept your offer. If I don't want you to leave this message board, what good is your offer that includes you leaving?
Answering my initial questions, and engaging in the follow-on conversation that will result from your answers, is how real veterans verify each other. If you are a real retired SGM, you'd know that. The fact that you would insist that I "accept your offer" speaks volumes to the fact that you are not a retired SGM.