(you gave me another chance to show your are dumb):"Your are dumb."
Originally Posted by LexusLover
Late Breaking News from the Patriarch of the Idiot Family!
But he keeps coming back for more ....
Here it is again ..(you gave me another chance to show your are dumb):
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/0...e-to-ice-loss#
.."the observed "rebounding" effect is over 10 times faster than was expected given the amount of ice lost." Originally Posted by LexusLover
You just keep digging deeper... Originally Posted by i'va biggenYes, you do.
Yes, you do.
Originally Posted by LexusLover View Post
But he keeps coming back for more ....
Here it is again ..(you gave me another chance to show your are dumb):
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/0...e-to-ice-loss#
.."the observed "rebounding" effect is over 10 times faster than was expected given the amount of ice lost."
Keep giving me more opportunities to show you are a liar. Please do. Originally Posted by LexusLover
Poor pitiable IB.You're a conspicuous liar, Old-Twerp, because, and for your edification, Old-Twerp, LexusLover's question was:
Yes, floating is about Archimedes. But that wasn't the question.
And my issue isn't with a person's religion, it is with their blowhard hypocrisy--like you. Originally Posted by Old-T
"Archimedes Principle" addresses LexusLover's question exactly:So, ....does the iceberg hold the water down or does the water hold up the iceberg? Originally Posted by LexusLover
"The weight of the water displaced [LL's "hold-down"] will equal the weight of the object [LL's iceberg] floating [LL's "hold-up"] in water."You're a liar, and you only make yourself look increasingly ignorant and stupidly dishonest, Old-Twerp, when you argue that it was Newton who first observed and documented this scientific principle.
Sir Isaac says both. Originally Posted by Old-T
You're a conspicuous liar, Old-Twerp, because, and for your edification, Old-Twerp, LexusLover's question was: Originally Posted by I B HankeringIBIdiot's trying to drive off "liar" competition! Hell, he ought to be focused on LexiLiar and not OT.
And .... "your are dumb." Originally Posted by bigtexIBIdiot's trying to drive off "liar" competition! Hell, he ought to be focused on LexiLiar and not OT.
If IBIdiot can get LexiLiar out of the way, he would be in the running for Patriarch of the Idiot clan! Originally Posted by bigtexdouble post Originally Posted by bigtex