Hillary is starting look doubtful....

by an ugly old fart who fucked another ugly old fart when she was a ugly younger fart. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Did you post a review?

Did you post a review? Originally Posted by bigtex

I don't "do reviews," but if I were ever impaired enough to fuck Hillarious (past, present, or future), I more than likely would either not remember or not want to remember to write a review for you.

But you don't need a "review" with ROS for Hillarious do you?

Just close your eyes and dream on, BigTitsLiarStalker.

When you were passing out flyers for Bill back in the early 90's, were you thinking you might curry favor for a threesome?

hinking you might curry favor for a threesome? Originally Posted by LexusLover

Link?????

Link????? Originally Posted by bigtex

Are you incapable of quoting things accurately? And you call others "idiots"?

Here's your "link"!


And please don't accuse me of "outing you" ... it's your "next of kin"!

IMO she has enough burdens in life being the "presumptive" daughter to Bill and Hillary without the added accusation of being a "love child" by an ugly old fart who fucked another ugly old fart when she was a ugly younger fart.

DNA (yes, Bill, there is such a thing) should put those questions "to bed" so to speak, because I doubt if one will get any man, no matter how ugly, to admit he had sex with Hillarious long enough to conceive a child.

There is so much more important stuff to discuss about Hillarious, than she was able to get someone to fuck her long enough to get herself pregnant. Originally Posted by LexusLover

It appears that the above is a text book example of something you referenced in another thread. (See below)

You continually make my point with each post. Do you actually believe your repetitive childish posts make it "true"? You still live in childhood nursery books ... at least mentality. No substance, just hot air to contribute. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Yep LLIdiot, you did an excellent job of self-reflection regarding your repetitive childish posts. (see above) And that you still live in childhood nursery books ... at least mentally (see above). And of course, you have no substance, just hot air to contribute (see above).

As I said previously, there is hope for you yet.

Please continue with your repetitive childish posts from your childhood nursery books ... at least mentally (see above), such as the one referenced at the tippy-top (does it remind you of your pointy hat) of this post!

"Carry on!"

Here's your "link"!
Originally Posted by LexusLover

Thanks LLIdiot, for providing additional self-reflective evidence of your repetitive childish posts. And that you still live in childhood nursery books ... at least mentally. And of course, you have no substance, just hot air to contribute.

As I said previously, there is hope for you yet.

Feel free to "carry on" with your childish ways!

Feel free to "carry on!" Originally Posted by bigtex

I've been "free to Carry On" for years. Unrestrained by my past, as you are.

Please enjoy yourself with your adolescent frivolity and empty posts.

You are rapidly graduating to YouRong's class ... Fart Level ...

All stinky, hot air and no substance.

Hillarious deserves your support. She's earned it.

Please enjoy yourself with your adolescent frivolity and empty posts. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Speaking of "adolescent frivolity and empty posts."

Take a close gander at the following textbook example of "adolescent frivolity and empty posts":

IMO she has enough burdens in life being the "presumptive" daughter to Bill and Hillary without the added accusation of being a "love child" by an ugly old fart who fucked another ugly old fart when she was a ugly younger fart.

DNA (yes, Bill, there is such a thing) should put those questions "to bed" so to speak, because I doubt if one will get any man, no matter how ugly, to admit he had sex with Hillarious long enough to conceive a child.

There is so much more important stuff to discuss about Hillarious, than she was able to get someone to fuck her long enough to get herself pregnant. Originally Posted by LexusLover

LLIdiot, keep those textbook examples of "adolescent frivolity and empty posts" coming!

I get a kick out of 'em!

....so who do the democrats have left; Joe Biden or Elizabeth "Fauxcohontas" Warren? Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Thread topic.

Thanks LLIdiot, for providing additional self-reflective evidence of your repetitive childish posts. And that you still live in childhood nursery books ... at least mentally. And of course, you have no substance, just hot air to contribute.

As I said previously, there is hope for you yet.

Feel free to "carry on" with your childish ways! Originally Posted by bigtex

How many people died in Iraq? What was the war? (think ill fated...) talk about repetitive posts

How many people died in Iraq? What was the war? (think ill fated...) talk about repetitive posts Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Are you speaking of the ill fated and ill advised, spring of 2003 invasion of Iraq?

If so, 4500+ Americans died and at a cost of almost $1 trillion. Give or take a few $$$$$'s.

Are you speaking of the ill fated and ill advised, spring of 2003 invasion of Iraq?

If so, 4500+ Americans died .... Originally Posted by bigtex

That is not a true statement. BigTitsLiarStalker ... lying again.

The invasion lasted from March through April ("Spring Invasion") of 2003 ...

.... in all of 2003 = about 500 U.S. servicemember deaths.

No wonder you voted for obaminable..... now lower case.

Carry on!

.... in all of 2003 = about 500 U.S. servicemember deaths. Originally Posted by LexusLover

For the record, the number of American deaths in 2003 is 14 less than the 500 you used as a reference point. By the same token, the total number of American deaths between 2003 and 2013 is also 14 less than the 4500 that I regularly use as a reference point.

The actual number of American deaths in Iraq following the ill fated and ill advised spring of 2003 invasion of Iraq is found below:

2003=486
2004=849
2005=846
2006=823
2007=904
2008=314
2009=149
2010= 60
2011= 54
2012= 1

http://icasualties.org/Iraq/Index.aspx

CARRY ON

....so who do the democrats have left; Joe Biden or Elizabeth "Fauxcohontas" Warren? Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

She did vote in favor of the authority to invade Iraq in 2003, right?

After all she had the "experience" and "knowledge" from being with Bill ...

.. when he got the authority to attack Iraq in .... 1998 or thereabouts.

That also was for failing to cooperate with UN inspections for WMD's, right?

Carry on. ... BigTitsLiarStalker ... now you can chatter about "the invasion"!

BigTitsLiarStalker.... the "invasion" you whine about was "Spring of 2003"!!!!

Less than 500 U.S. deaths in 2003! Quit exaggerating, and lying.

For the record, the number of American deaths in 2003 is 14 less than the 500 you used as a reference point. By the same token, the total number of American deaths between 2003 and 2013 is also 14 less than the 4500 that I regularly used as a reference point.

The actual number of American deaths in Iraq following the ill fated and ill advised spring of 2003 invasion of Iraq is found below:

2003=486
2004=849
2005=846
2006=823
2007=904
2008=314
2009=149
2010= 60
2011= 54
2012= 1

http://icasualties.org/Iraq/Index.aspx

CARRY ON Originally Posted by bigtex

Duffus .. the Spring of 2003 invasion was in 2003. You really are retarded.

Yes, I've seen what you "regularly use" ... when you are exaggerating ...

you even toss in Obaminable's losses to make it look worse .... CARRY ON LYING!

Here's your selfie again ..