Why no answer Mr. St. Christopher?

I can see you spending your life learning how little you know.

Why yes, that's exactly right. I believe learning is a life-long process. And the more I learn, the more I am aware of how much additional knowledge of the world awaits my discovery.

I can see it because you show off what you've learned all the time.

Correcting you all the time is nothing to boast about. It's just a necessary nuisance, like using toilet paper.
Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Back for more? Bumping your own pathetic, mod-baiting thread? What the fuck happened? Did you run out of inebriating beverages? Or dicks to munch?

So now you can't read?
You didn't correct me this time.
All you did was parrot tranny fucker. I pointed out how he was wrong. That means you are too.
He didn't even try to refute the grammar rules that applied to the situation. He just whined about how everyone understood....I mean didn't understand what the word "Illicit" did.

The intent of the statement hasn't been addressed by the mods and probably won't be. I can live with that but it doesn't look like you can.
Just pointing out the actual meaning as I see it according to the rules of grammar I've found. Of course, tranny fucker was quick to add his take on things while ignoring the joining of 2 noun phrases and what the noun in question was.
Left you some links.


You never refuted that interview with one of the founders of ISIS. I can see where that still stings you.

Back for more? Bumping your own pathetic, mod-baiting thread? What the fuck happened? Did you run out of inebriating beverages? Or dicks to munch? Originally Posted by lustylad

You speak for everyone? In other words, you can't refute me.

This is just like your stance on the assault of the reporter in Montana. In that case, your claim was refuted by the congressman himself.

In this case, your large, trembling, and well chewed lower lip in its pout position won't change the fact that you, and any of the people you actually speak for, have a misunderstanding. I included links to help ease the burden of understanding for you.

But you'll come back without links or proof and claim your unsupportable position is correct. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

You were refuted, masterdickmuncher. You're just too stupid to realize it, masterdickmuncher.

Back for more? Bumping your own pathetic, mod-baiting thread? What the fuck happened? Did you run out of inebriating beverages? Or dicks to munch? Originally Posted by lustylad

Never will says Dickmunch

You saying I'm refuted doesn't mean shit without you showing proof.
We'll just leave it at you not being able to show proof.
If you could, you would have done it by now.
Your previous refute has been refuted.
Put up or shut up.

You were refuted, masterdickmuncher. You're just too stupid to realize it, masterdickmuncher. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Quote:
Originally Posted by Munchmasterman
You recognized a total lack of support by our mods on a valid question they never had the courtesy or the balls to rule on.

if it was a valid question they'd have replied long before now. i refer you to this post for why they will never respond

https://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=1059403657&post count=89

any questions??? bahhaaa

You saying I'm refuted doesn't mean shit without you showing proof.
We'll just leave it at you not being able to show proof.
If you could, you would have done it by now.
Your previous refute has been refuted.
Put up or shut up. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

You were refuted, masterdickmuncher, and you remain too stupid to realize it, masterdickmuncher.

Back for more? Bumping your own pathetic, mod-baiting thread? What the fuck happened? Did you run out of inebriating beverages? Or dicks to munch? Originally Posted by lustylad

Well...ya know lad.... ...things HAVE been tight for the production line of dingleberry wine since the reach around crews " main source " of berries ( seArgent shitburner ) went on " vacation " from here. Funny how THIS " vacation " is different from the one he took, in haste, on election night !!!! They are still replacing the windows from the sonic boom of his WIDE ASS leaving the area !!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Munchmasterman
You recognized a total lack of support by our mods on a valid question they never had the courtesy or the balls to rule on.

if it was a valid question they'd have replied long before now.That's your opinion since you aren't a mod. And they don't have to reply. i refer you to this post for why they will never respond

https://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=1059403657&post count=89

any questions???Not that you can answer. bahhaaa
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

You must have missed this line

"The intent of the statement hasn't been addressed by the mods and probably won't be. I can live with that but it doesn't look like you can."

The mods will enforce as they see fit. It's not up to us to decide one way or another.

You were refuted, masterdickmuncher, and you remain too stupid to realize it, masterdickmuncher. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You've gone into repeat mode. Which is okay with me.
I proved your nasty ass wrong. And no matter how many times you proclaim you're right, you aren't. Check my post to see why you're wrong.
Another round of cum shots for the tranny fucker.

You've gone into repeat mode. Which is okay with me.
I proved your nasty ass wrong. And no matter how many times you proclaim you're right, you aren't. Check my post to see why you're wrong.
Another round of cum shots for the tranny fucker. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

There's only one version of the truth, masterdickmuncher, but you repeatedly deny it. Hence, repeating the truth for your edification is necessary, masterdickmuncher.

For a change, IBIdiot is playing stupid word games.

This place is more juvenile by the day.

And dumber.

How right you are. There is only one version of the truth.
And you already forgot it.
Here it is.
Sorry. "Illicit drug" and "drug use" are 2 types of the noun "mention". "Illicit drug mention" and "drug use mentions" are both noun phrases. "And"
is the coordinating conjunction that links the 2 noun phrases.
The adjective "illicit" only describes the type of drug the mention is referring to in the first noun phrase. It is an illicit drug mention. In the second noun phrase, "drug" only describes the type of use the mention is referring to in the second noun phrase. It is a drug use mention.
The noun phrases are separate until joined by "and". "Illicit" plays no part in the second noun phrase.

http://www.studypro.eu/v2/english-gr...positions.html

http://www.grammar-monster.com/gloss...un_phrases.htm

mention
[men-shuhn]

verb (used with object)
1.
to refer briefly to; name, specify, or speak of:
Don't forget to mention her contribution to the project.
2.
to cite formally for a meritorious act or achievement:
He was mentioned in dispatches from the war zone.

noun
3.
a direct or incidental reference; a mentioning:
to make mention of a place.

There's only one version of the truth, masterdickmuncher, but you repeatedly deny it. Hence, repeating the truth for your edification is necessary, masterdickmuncher. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You don't even have to admit it. Your lack of proof says it all for you.

You all know the big forbidden topics such as children, underage sex, illicit drug mention and drug use mentions, bestiality, revealing personal info, medical speculation, or images not in compliance and any type of racial slurs...those will not be tolerated Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Sister Mary Grammatica says that's one poorly written sentence. Please step up to the blackboard.

No argument from me in that regard.
"Political Forum Rules
Now that these discussions are being moved here, lets lay out the very simple ground rules.

These discussions will be very lightly moderated.

You all know the big forbidden topics such as children, underage sex, illicit drug mention and drug use mentions, bestiality, revealing personal info, medical speculation, or images not in compliance and any type of racial slurs...those will not be tolerated.

Beyond that, you are on your own."


That is a "sticky" from Chica Chaser.

Sister Mary Grammatica says that's one poorly written sentence. Please step up to the blackboard.

Originally Posted by chicagoboy

The mods will enforce as they see fit. It's not up to us to decide one way or another.


. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

the mod's aren't going to enforce non-existent rules and they don't make up rules as they go.

but keep ranting. it's amusing.