Trump announces transgenders cannot serve in the Military!

WTF either does not identify with either gender. But I am guessin that WTF would identify AS a female because of that big clit he is "packin" .... ijs Originally Posted by TryWeakly

NaMo is wittier than you

The Military is designed to destroy things and kill people. Not to be a social laboratory.

I agree 100%

I believe Prolongus' was simply trying to demonstrate the whimsical nature of Trump's sudden decision to ban Transgendered people from military service.

However, if cost is the only issue, then there really isn't an issue. The cost is barely in the military's budget's margin of error for office supplies.

I think there is alot of fat that can be trimmed from their expenses and still keep the U.S.A far far faaaarrr out front of any other military force.

This doesn't even scratch it though.


Do you have any other reasons aside from cost?

Unit cohesiveness is a bull reason as well. Soldiers are required to do lots of things that they would consider disgusting. It's part of the job. Those with an issue because they feel its gross or icky, can get over it. Originally Posted by grean

Odumbo's people calculated that the medical coasts could reach $4.2 million per year, puke green. $4.2 million can buy 6.2 thousand M4 carbines or four Tomahawk missiles, puke green ... or tons of ammunition or ordnance to fire at the enemy, puke green.

Really? Are you implying that the Constitution for the most part does not apply to people in the military? Originally Posted by Old-T

Did I "imply" that? Or are you attempting to deflect from the dumbass statement you made that the Constitution required the military to allow pre-op "transgender" sexually confused individuals into the services?

I simply asked you "where" does it say that?

You can't point it out!

And before you leap too far into the deep water you might want to revisit the recent turn of events with respect to "immigration policy"!!!

Odumbo's people calculated that the medical coasts could reach $4.2 million per year, puke green. $4.2 million can buy 6.2 thousand M4 carbines or four Tomahawk missiles, puke green ... or tons of ammunition or ordnance to fire at the enemy, puke green. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

4.2 million is the military equivalent of us paying 50 bucks more for greek. If we don't waste it on fucking a whore in the ass, we are going to waste it in a cheap blow job instead. It in no way keeps us from paying another hooker next week to fuck.

Odumbo's people calculated that the medical coasts could reach $4.2 million per year, puke green. $4.2 million can buy 6.2 thousand M4 carbines or four Tomahawk missiles, puke green ... or tons of ammunition or ordnance to fire at the enemy, puke green. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

How many rifles could 89 million dollars the military spends on Viagra buy?

The Military is designed to destroy things and kill people. Not to be a social laboratory.

I agree 100%

I believe Prolongus' was simply trying to demonstrate the whimsical nature of Trump's sudden decision to ban Transgendered people from military service.

However, if cost is the only issue, then there really isn't an issue. The cost is barely in the military's budget's margin of error for office supplies.

I think there is alot of fat that can be trimmed from their expenses and still keep the U.S.A far far faaaarrr out front of any other military force.

This doesn't even scratch it though.


Do you have any other reasons aside from cost?

Unit cohesiveness is a bull reason as well. Soldiers are required to do lots of things that they would consider disgusting. It's part of the job. Those with an issue because they feel its gross or icky, can get over it. Originally Posted by grean

Or was it Obamas "whimsical" nature that rammed this down the Military's throat in the first place. I already explained some of the burdens that fall on the Military concerning Transgenders. Do you think a complete sex change is like cutting your toenails? To think that there's not huge adjustments that a person has to go through is ignorant at best on your part. And I personally don't want a dime of my tax dollars going to sex reassignment procedures. Nope, not a dime. That's not my responsibility. What's next, blind pilots? Why not have the blind sign up to be Naval Aviators and land F14s on ACs? What is your rational for having Transgenders in the Military? Try not to be a simpleton liberal about it.

I believe Prolongus' was simply trying to demonstrate the whimsical nature of Trump's sudden decision to ban Transgendered people from military service.

Originally Posted by grean

Exactly who decided his decision was "whimsical" or "sudden"?

You? Prodlungess? Or the Gay media?

In the meantime, study up before you buddy up!

https://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/fe...ook_093016.pdf

"The guidelines reveal that soldiers only need to get a diagnosis from a medical doctor and change their gender in a database before showering with the opposite sex." ....

The military spent more on Viagra than they would have on transgender.... which Hardly boost your argument that the military is there to just kill people Originally Posted by WTF

Viagra is standard issue now to new recruits. They give them all a sample bottle just to remind them they are getting fucked by a big Red, White and Blue Weenie, lol.


Jim

How many rifles could 89 million dollars the military spends on Viagra buy? Originally Posted by WTF

How many service personnel were physically too incapacitated to perform their military mission for a period of one to two years while taking Viagra?

4.2 million is the military equivalent of us paying 50 bucks more for greek. If we don't waste it on fucking a whore in the ass, we are going to waste it in a cheap blow job instead. It in no way keeps us from paying another hooker next week to fuck. Originally Posted by grean

That's pure equivocation, puke green. What you do with your money is your concern. What the government does with my money, is my concern. And that $4.2 million is solely for medical costs. It doesn't address the down time for recovery that these individuals will not be able to fulfill their military mission.

How many rifles could 89 million dollars the military spends on Viagra buy? Originally Posted by WTF

if your fighting men aren't happy those extra rifles could be meaningless

what do you need to be able to fight effectively?

air to breathe

water to drink

food to eat

equipment

a clear as possible mind

support

Viagra is in there either under equipment, a clear mind or support

How many service personnel were physically too incapacitated to perform their military mission for a period of one to two years while taking Viagra? Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Viagra would be a waste for SnitchFuck. He uses tweezers to get his pecker to stand erect. Captain Tranny!

What does a volunteer military need? volunteers.

What does a volunteer military need? volunteers. Originally Posted by wordup666

"Volunteers" that can actually perform their assigned military mission and aren't on "light duty chits" for months on end because they had their tallywackers abbreviated, moron.

"Volunteers" that can actually perform their assigned military mission and aren't on "light duty chits" for months on end because they had their tallywackers abbreviated, moron. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Then you think everyone joining is just wanting surgery?

What's next, blind pilots? Why not have the blind sign up to be Naval Aviators and land F14s on ACs? What is your rational for having Transgenders in the Military? Try not to be a simpleton liberal about it. Originally Posted by bambino

Now we are comparing apples and oranges.

A blind person is physically unable to serve, obviously.

Being transgendered does not affect a person's ability to perform their function in the military.

There are currently, as I believe you have mentioned previously a couple of thousand transgendered people serving and performing their functions above and beyond spec.

Moreover, as far as the blind person example, if a procedure could restore their vision to or above an acceptable level, if the military is willing to pay for that in exchange for a term of service from that person, I don't think anyone would question that.

The military uses college tuition in exchange for service.

The military also covers breast implants last I heard.