As you know I'm on the same page with adav8s28 on this. However, hypothetically suppose that Andersen leans toward believing that COVID 19 is the product of gain of function research in the Wuhan lab. What's he going to say? If he and other colleagues piss off the Chinese, then they're potentially cut off from getting any information out of China or working with the Chinese to make the world a safer place. You've got a lot of people in China living on top of each other, wet markets, etc. It's a breeding ground for deadly viruses. Here are WHO updates on ones since 2000:
https://www.who.int/csr/don/archive/country/chn/en/ Originally Posted by Tiny
Andersen was only one of many who expressed the idea that the virus structure looks manipulated. Only mentioned him as he's the only one I'm aware of that emailed Fauci about it. Others still stand by their original claims or at least I've not heard of further recanted claims. Correct me if I'm wrong.
You'll have to excuse my skepticism on this but I don't have any faith in the idea that the Chinese will cooperate with us on finding the origin of this regardless of what we say or how, especially if they had any sort of culpability. Do you really?
I'm also skeptical that doing this type of research actually does make us safer. So was the Obama administration. So are the 3.7 mil who died.
A bunch of clowns arguing about this on a hooker board isn't going to change anyone's mind about the issue. We'll have to leave that to science and it's practitioners. But, science won't and can't find the answer if it is prevented from pursuing legitimate avenues of inquiry by claims of racism or by associating them with the Carnival Barker in Chief.