How is this any better than bbfs?

Every time you open your mouth you just prove my point. We all know why you argued when I talked about a comparison with oral sex. It's because you do CIM and you wanted to make it sound like it was so much safer than this NURU. Even with your online statistics the difference was only 5 out of 10000 and that was with full on intercourse. What is your cut off 7 out of 10000? Don't try to make yourself sound so informed when even at your math the difference is very small. Every time you let a guy cum in your mouth you take a chance. Every time you jack a guy off if you have a cut on your hand you take a chance.The original point I was making was that we should do only what we are comfortable with and because I mentioned something that you do you had to separate yourself from it by making it sound like the black plague and what you do as intelligent and safe, You just made yourself look foolish. Maybe you ought to get off that bratty teenage girl perch of yours and recognize that there is some intelligence in this world and its not always coming from you. The only reference I made to my age is that I retired at 50 and since you are into math and statistics only 1 percent of the population of the country are able to do that.

Ok Burk...whatever. CIM and Cum in VAGINA is NOT nearly the same risk. Look it up, and get educated please. So...why do you cover up for bbfs if you're fixed Burk? Why not for bbbj? Nuff said.

I know cim is risky and I never said it was smart, but I would never let a guy nut all over my freaking vagina! THAT is a hell of a lot more risky than cim...geez! 3 out of 5 providers allow bbbj...hmm why is that? Why is that not 3 out of 5 offering bbfs? Stick to the facts of the topic please, or go play.

Retiring with nothing but a freaking condo in Nebraska not even a damn house, it not what I would be bragging about Burk...but hey, you brought it up lol. If that was all I wanted out of life, I could have retired when I was 25...what's your point?

I really want to hijack this thread but I haven't been pointed since I got back and I'd like to keep things that way . lol

I am going to kick your azz! Originally Posted by London Rayne

That'll be hard to do while doing me BB missionary



To all the slower folks, I'm joking and London knows it. Though I do have my fingers crossed.

Oh Baby, the things you say! Leave your GF at home!

Oh Baby, the things you say! Leave your GF at home! Originally Posted by London Rayne

Uh... I was just gonna say I truly HOPE he is not bringing the GF to NY. She will hate him afterwards .

Ok Burk...whatever. CIM and Cum in VAGINA is NOT nearly the same risk. Look it up, and get educated please. So...why do you cover up for bbfs Burk? Why not for bbbj? Nuff said.

I know cim is risky and I never said it was smart, but I would never let a guy nut all over my freaking vagina! THAT is a hell of a lot more risky than cim...geez! 3 out of 5 providers allow bbbj...hmm why is that? Why is that not 3 out of 5 offering bbfs? Stick to the facts of the topic please, or go play. Originally Posted by London Rayne

Did you not ever take a math class. I agreed that 5 out 10000 and 10 out of 10000 are different at 10 out of 10000 the chance is .010. If I buy a lottery ticket my chance is one in 200,000,000 if I buy 2 lottery tickets although it's twice as good the odds are 2 in 200,000,000. Either way the chances are slim. Now if I compare exterior ejaculation and the odds of it getting inside your vagina I would say maybe it's one in 5. Remember if its NURU style I may cum when my penis is on the upstroke and the ejacualte would end up on your stomach. Now when I have full servce as the article is quoting the odds of the ejaculate getting into your vagina are 100 percent. So to say they are the same? Well maybe in your math class but in the real world NO!. Maybe you could go back to class and learn a little math first. I know it's difficult with out the fingers and toes but I promise you it is possible. Don't try to argue when you don't even understand the numbers. I know it's different than buying clothes and makeup so maybe it's out of your ability. The bottom line is there is not that much difference and just because you do one and not the other doesn't make the other something thats evil and stupid. It just comes down to being comfortable with it or not. Not because you stomp your foot and say it is.

I may not be an expert in Nuru Massage, but common sense is not a far stretch for me. Add to that I spent 7 years in school for Health Care Mgmt. in which we did have to take course after course on bs that had nothing to do with Admin. If you are all for this type of risk, more power to ya, but ignoring the FACTS is pretty lame IMO. You shed no light on this thread anyway, other than to make one post about what I thought the answer was. Care to share your wit and insight, or were you just bored?

I don't need to dissect this any further, when the risk is obvious. Anyone doing the activity in that video is a walking STD waiting to happen, and I agree with Biomech and Tigercat. If the gel prevented the exchange of fluids from happening, is that not the same thing as saying KY could prevent this with bbfs? If the gel is a barrier, it's a barrier in any case, so that is ludicrous to me.

Rambo....I will catch you in Texas!

Tigercat, thank you for actually stating the real facts and answering my question lol. Originally Posted by London Rayne

You've based this whole argument on one video. Your doing a thing called generalizing.
My point is you are not an expert. Your statements are written as such. Unless you are a MEDICAL expert, then don't act like one. That was the fucking point of my one post.

Ok Burk...whatever you say lol. It's like talking to a brick wall. I will let you know when the cervix in my throat gets HPV from cim lmao. If you are only going by that one article, you are the one who needs math because there are hundreds of thousands. Every guy on this board but YOU seems to know bbbj and cim are much less risky than bbfs or ejaculating on the vagina. I did not compare ejaculation inside to outside! I compared bbfs with NO EJACULATION to this nuru massage in which cum is in fact on and in her! Again Burk..why do you cover up for bbfs and not bbbj? Thank you! Probably the same reason I cover up for bbfs yet allow cim!

Oneinamillion, you really don't know what credentials I have so that's baseless. I said "IF" nuru massage was done like it is in that video, it was no safer than bbfs. That is what I have yet to hear. Do ladies in fact do it that way or take other precautions? If it was with a condom, or a thong I might partake.

Ok Burk...whatever you say lol. It's like talking to a brick wall. I will let you know when the cervix in my throat gets HPV from cim lmao. If you are only going by that one article, you are the one who needs math because there are hundreds of thousands. Every guy on this board but YOU seems to know bbbj and cim are much less risky than bbfs or ejaculating on the vagina. Again Burk..why do you cover up for bbfs and not bbbj? Thank you!

Oneinamillion, you really don't know what credentials I have so that's baseless. I said "IF" nuru massage was done like it is in that video, it was no safer than bbfs. That is what I have yet to hear. Do ladies in fact do it that way or take other precautions? If it was with a condom, or a thong I would partake. Originally Posted by London Rayne

Now she's even backing away from her own article." Oh that's just one of thousands" Well maybe if you look hard enough you can find one that makes you look good. I don't care if you partake or not. I have never even done this in my life. The reason I brought it up is because you had to tell everyone that you were right and everyone was wrong. Simple math ( and I mean simple) tells you there is not that much statisical difference. Your ignorance of it while you were spouting out your "I'm so smart" declarations just made you look stupid. I even at this point after I spelled it out in plain english for you I don't think you understand. My original point was not to get in any kind of fight on this thread but to just say it's up to the person thinking about. You are the one that came out with your Wrong Again declaration before you even understood what you were talking about. You keep saying your trying to finish this externship. I would advise you to study a little harder or it just might take a long time.

On a different but somewhat related note, what about providers who participate in BBFS during porn? Is BBFS more acceptable when it's being filmed for mass distribution? I've always wondered about that. I've seen more than a handful of ladies who include links to BBFS porn that they have done, and I have often wondered what makes BBFS porn more acceptable than other types of equally risky activities. Thoughts?

I said "IF" nuru massage was done like it is in that video, it was no safer than bbfs. That is what I have yet to hear. Do ladies in fact do it that way or take other precautions? If it was with a condom, or a thong I might partake. Originally Posted by London Rayne

This is what I agree with.

Burk, Please stop the name calling. Let's try to be civil here.

On a different but somewhat related note, what about providers who participate in BBFS during porn? Is BBFS more acceptable when it's being filmed for mass distribution? I've always wondered about that. I've seen more than a handful of ladies who include links to BBFS porn that they have done, and I have often wondered what makes BBFS porn more acceptable than other types of equally risky activities. Thoughts? Originally Posted by Dannie

Good question Dannie.

I think it is fucking gross. Did you see this article? http://news.yahoo.com/hiv-case-cause...213600946.html

If I were a guy, I would never see a provider/pornstar that engages in BBFS. NO it is not acceptable.

Sure there are those that are sleeping with their SOs/Husbands without protection but their SOs/Husbands aren't fucking others for a living.

On a different but somewhat related note, what about providers who participate in BBFS during porn? Is BBFS more acceptable when it's being filmed for mass distribution? I've always wondered about that. I've seen more than a handful of ladies who include links to BBFS porn that they have done, and I have often wondered what makes BBFS porn more acceptable than other types of equally risky activities. Thoughts? Originally Posted by Dannie

They are tested every thirty days for all kinds a STDs. There have been instances of disease in the industry but its a very low number. I think the fact that they know that they would be out of a career if they caught anything also keeps them from risky activities outside of the industry.

On a different but somewhat related note, what about providers who participate in BBFS during porn? Is BBFS more acceptable when it's being filmed for mass distribution? I've always wondered about that. I've seen more than a handful of ladies who include links to BBFS porn that they have done, and I have often wondered what makes BBFS porn more acceptable than other types of equally risky activities. Thoughts? Originally Posted by Dannie

They are tested in the porn business.