Another quagmire in the Middle East…..

There’s really any doubt that today’s Dem party would be marching in the streets with Hands off Hitler and Hirohito signs?

There’s really any doubt that today’s Dem party would be marching in the streets with Hands off Hitler and Hirohito signs? Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

And today's Republican party is marching in the streets cheering their own dictator. You know, they one that just started a war he can't win. The one who will say Putin told him he wasn't giving Iran information about American targets in region to get US soldiers killed. And the one who will believe Putin over facts...because he doesn't have the balls to confront him.

I don't have a problem with the WSJ. I don't think they are biased towards a particular party. Don't forget the WSJ wrote that Kamala Harris won the presidential debate over Trump. Originally Posted by adav8s28

"In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They're eating — they are eating the pets of the people that live there". Donald J Trump.

There’s really any doubt that today’s Dem party would be marching in the streets with Hands off Hitler and Hirohito signs? Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

You are doing that now kamerade

Could you imagine Trump playing the part of FDR in 1940.

The lend lease act would never have happened. Bringing the country together to confront the axis powers after the attack on Pearl Harbor. Could you imagine a Trump fireside chat?

Some in this thread see fit to call democrats cowards and appeasers. Maybe we just recognize the Massive failings of our commander in chief.

A dumber more divisive and corrupt individual would be really difficult to find. Is it any wonder that his actions are the cause for deep dread to anyone with the brains to recognize the flaws in his administration.

Polling numbers certainly show that he doesn’t have the confidence of the electorate in this matter. Insults to our character certainly won’t bring the country together. Trump would be better off trying to convince the public of the righteousness of his actions. Some how I doubt he will or is capable of doing so.

Cue the feigned indignation. Struck a nerve on that one.

Cue the feigned indignation. Struck a nerve on that one. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

Interesting interpretation. You started by posting this divisive exaggeration:

There’s really any doubt that today’s Dem party would be marching in the streets with Hands off Hitler and Hirohito signs? Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

What type of reaction were you expecting? Or hoping to achieve? Nothing good or constructive to dialog, that's for sure.

MY interpretation is that...you got trashed. For posting trash. Maybe try to make an actual point next time, rather than a Troll attack just intended to cause shit.

.

There’s really any doubt that today’s Dem party would be marching in the streets with Hands off Hitler and Hirohito signs? Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

Cue the feigned indignation. Struck a nerve on that one. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

Comparing today’s Democrats to people marching with “Hands off Hitler and Hirohito” signs is quite a leap.

Disagreeing about whether a military strike was necessary, whether Congress should be involved, or what the long-term consequences might be isn’t the same thing as defending World War II dictators. That’s just normal political debate.

Jumping straight from “people disagree with this war” to “they would have supported Hitler” says more about the level of exaggeration in the argument than it does about anyone’s actual position.

Comparing today’s Democrats to people marching with “Hands off Hitler and Hirohito” signs is quite a leap.

Disagreeing about whether a military strike was necessary, whether Congress should be involved, or what the long-term consequences might be isn’t the same thing as defending World War II dictators. That’s just normal political debate.

Jumping straight from “people disagree with this war” to “they would have supported Hitler” says more about the level of exaggeration in the argument than it does about anyone’s actual position. Originally Posted by fd-guy

Who's defending fascism here?

Who's defending fascism here? Originally Posted by Turner2099

Not clear on what you mean....so who?

Not clear on what you mean....so who? Originally Posted by fd-guy

Sorry, made a not obvious satirical comment that fell flat. My bad. : )

Jumping off the supporting Hitler comment to imply that Trump's followers are the ones actually supporting the fascism leader.

Comparing today’s Democrats to people marching with “Hands off Hitler and Hirohito” signs is quite a leap. Originally Posted by fd-guy

Accurate, given recent circumstances. We’re talking about people who lose their minds when criminals who illegally came into the country are thrown back out because they don’t like the guy doing the throwing.

Accurate, given recent circumstances. We’re talking about people who lose their minds when criminals who illegally came into the country are thrown back out because they don’t like the guy doing the throwing. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

Your thinking is both biased, partisan and fatally flawed. You are also being rather insulting. On purpose.

You are equating two different things which are not related and coming to a conclusion that’s biased as a result.

Cue the feigned indignation. Struck a nerve on that one. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

Our indignation is not feigned.

Cue the feigned indignation. Struck a nerve on that one. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

Is that your goal, to strike a nerve?

IMHO you're nothing more than a troll. Eventually, we'll see you down the road.

Is that your goal, to strike a nerve?

IMHO you're nothing more than a troll. Eventually, we'll see you down the road. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Fetch me a drink boy!

So what if there's a war in the middle east. This is nothing new. There will be many more wars in the future too. Rather than cry about it, seek treatment for Trump derangement syndrome