Tucker Carlson reports

Tuckie on his soapbox, Belittling and Dishonoring Biden, his own countries leader, and giving accolades to a the Russian leader for what? Saying he' sure knows how to keep those Ukrainians in line!? I think if you really ask yourself why Tuckems was over there, it's simple. Sensationalism.

He learned that from Murdoch, and thinks that he's going to keep his name in the media by posing some soft questions and get an audience with the same guy (Putin) who will not even sit in the same room with his current sublings and lieutenants. Great - you got to sit in a room with a dictator who controls everything in that country including the questions posed and answered.

Journalism or sensationalism? Does it even matter to the MAGA folks? They were on a steady diet of drama 24/7 for 4 yrs., and a little less drip over the past few years, but still thirsty like a diabetic and diet coke.

Tuckie on his soapbox, Belittling and Dishonoring Biden, his own countries leader, and giving accolades to a the Russian leader for what? Saying he' sure knows how to keep those Ukrainians in line!? I think if you really ask yourself why Tuckems was over there, it's simple. Sensationalism.

He learned that from Murdoch, and thinks that he's going to keep his name in the media by posing some soft questions and get an audience with the same guy (Putin) who will not even sit in the same room with his current sublings and lieutenants. Great - you got to sit in a room with a dictator who controls everything in that country including the questions posed and answered.

Journalism or sensationalism? Does it even matter to the MAGA folks? They were on a steady diet of drama 24/7 for 4 yrs., and a little less drip over the past few years, but still thirsty like a diabetic and diet coke. Originally Posted by eyecu2

obviously you didn't watch 1 minute before making a rather bland Ad hominem attack on Carlson. watch the first 10-15 minutes then get back to me. or don't.

obviously you didn't watch 1 minute before making a rather bland Ad hominem attack on Carlson. watch the first 10-15 minutes then get back to me. or don't. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

I watched the first 5 mins of him vassilating from his feelings and their ever-changing with the facts comments. That he was a proud American who values his family and his freedom...which US soldiers fought and died to give him. Spoke about the CIA & NSA with as much contempt as a jilted high school debutante who was left on prom night by herself.
Then after he said the "Ref would have called the fight" in favor of Putin, it was pure cowtow propaganda.

He's a whiny sniveling little impetuous high school girl in a very shitty man's body. One that they forgot to put in a chin by the way, perhaps he's transitioning? Tucker told his interpreter exactly what he thought they wanted to hear. He's the Jane Fonda in Vietnam-- of his time.

you know perfectly well why. technology. that doesn't change the fact that only ABC, NBC and CBS are the only legacy over the airwaves broadcasters.


you'll have to explain what those two people claim. i googled their names and got this


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fox_Film


the problem with your claim is this .. FOX Films newsreels were MOVIE news reels NOT a over the air network news broadcast


like ABC, NBC and CBS.


Newsreels


In 1919, Removed all superfluous spew since the first radio station in the USA started to broadcast *AFTER* that date.

newsreels in movie theaters are not the same as a network news broadcast. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Oh. You're so cute when you lie and try to make others believe you.

And i'll restate it again. Greg Wilsbacher and Raymond Fielding have documented you being wrong. Foxy was the oldest legacy media company and major network. I gave you the source. You dispute them. Radio wasn't around when Mr. Fox gathered all the people around the world to record news for the moving pictures before they talked and also before the squawk box.

so your point is Carlson scored the interview no one else could and bragged about it? so your point here is Carlson is the modern day Edward R. Murrow? Walt Cronkite?


yeah he is



bahahaa Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Originally Posted by biomed1

OUCH!

Man! Even the Mod called BS on you.

tuckpad ain't a journalist. Go see Lowell Thomas if you want to know what a Journalist is. Sadly, one of the last ones in his ilk was Dan Rather. The guy that voluntarily took the hit for broadcasting a story that was made up. tucky has never done that.




So, here's tucky

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
you know perfectly well why. technology. that doesn't change the fact that only ABC, NBC and CBS are the only legacy over the airwaves broadcasters.


you'll have to explain what those two people claim. i googled their names and got this


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fox_Film


the problem with your claim is this .. FOX Films newsreels were MOVIE news reels NOT a over the air network news broadcast


like ABC, NBC and CBS.


Newsreels


In 1919, Removed all superfluous spew since the first radio station in the USA started to broadcast *AFTER* that date.

newsreels in movie theaters are not the same as a network news broadcast.

Oh. You're so cute when you lie and try to make others believe you.

And i'll restate it again. Greg Wilsbacher and Raymond Fielding have documented you being wrong. Foxy was the oldest legacy media company and major network. I gave you the source. You dispute them. Radio wasn't around when Mr. Fox gathered all the people around the world to record news for the moving pictures before they talked and also before the squawk box.



Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
so your point is Carlson scored the interview no one else could and bragged about it? so your point here is Carlson is the modern day Edward R. Murrow? Walt Cronkite?


yeah he is



bahahaa






Quote:
Originally Posted by biomed1



OUCH!

Man! Even the Mod called BS on you.

tuckpad ain't a journalist. Go see Lowell Thomas if you want to know what a Journalist is. Sadly, one of the last ones in his ilk was Dan Rather. The guy that voluntarily took the hit for broadcasting a story that was made up. tucky has never done that.





this thread isn't about FOX it's about Tucker Carlson

...
this thread isn't about FOX it's about Tucker Carlson Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Oh. You're so cute when you lie and try to make others believe you.

...
So, here's tucky Originally Posted by Precious_b

No it isn't. But it sure shows how foxy, tucky, and you LOVE to lie.

So, let me have some fun and play along.

Think you need to join your pal and cool down.

You just throw more shade on you and yours denying the lies.

No it isn't. But it sure shows how foxy, tucky, and you LOVE to lie.

So, let me have some fun and play along.

Think you need to join your pal and cool down.

You just throw more shade on you and yours denying the lies. Originally Posted by Precious_b

Lie? if you say so

Lie? Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

As you always illuminate when trying lead attention away from proof supplied.

if you say so
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

As you always illuminate when trying lead attention away from proof supplied.







Originally Posted by Precious_b

you continue to harp about FOX being a TV network NEWS legacy broadcaster when the facts say otherwise.


but this thread is about Carlson not FOX

you continue to harp about FOX being a TV network NEWS legacy broadcaster when the facts say otherwise.


but this thread is about Carlson not FOX ... Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

...
this thread isn't about FOX it's about Tucker Carlson Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

No it isn't. But it sure shows how foxy, tucky, and you LOVE to lie.

So, let me have some fun and play along.

Think you need to join your pal and cool down.

You just throw more shade on you and yours denying the lies. Originally Posted by Precious_b

I know the thread is about tuckpad. Even stated it.
But all you could do is



Were you sad that he showed pooty his man tan on his little change pouch? You could have fondled them first if you would have become his campaign manager like I kept suggesting to you.

But you persist in trying to push on of your many lies I pointed out to you. You have not disproved that rupert bought into the oldest mainstream media company in the USA when he set up shop
in 'Murica. Even when I supplied the facts for you. It seems you want people to prove there was internet and cable before the 1920s. Here is a fact for you: that ain't so. I already pointed out those media avenues. Just like that report VitaMan suggest you read, I again tell you to read Greg Wilsbacher and Raymond Fielding and they have a nice history showing it. And you can argue to them your falsehoods. I can quote more sources that say the same.

So, you stop bringing up the lie, and i'll stop correcting you. Better still, admit you are wrong since all sources you have supplied do not de-link rupert from William Fox and his building of a media empire.

So, here's to you and tuckys paranoia....or is that heightened perception?

And We're Done . . .

Thread Closed