Well according to the article, he did not recognize her legal name and only knew her from her stage name.
How was the owner of the place supposed to know unless the lawyer told him?
Do you find it strange that a lady with a law degree was supposedly being held against her will, doing massages against her will?
Or maybe the DA had cut her a deal to save her law license?
The article went on to say that the DA did not want a mistrial, the defendant did.
He fired his lawyer!
Nobody wants anyone doing anything aganist their will but do you know how many jobs I have done that I hated, nobody made me do them and I suspect that was the case here.
I can't recall a law grad working ina massage palor aganist her will, ever.
Originally Posted by WTF
No one is ever held against their will, it happens but rarely. Its same like you say all marriages are bad , because some are. Its just one of these claims generally made, i assume, because also girls get deals if they say something against their agency, and in the end everyone only worries about their own precious end of the back. Its all politics, and they want to make their case fit in court, claim as much as possible and get at least some fuzz down the road.
To the attorney / judge thingie: I wonder if there are ANY attorneys /judges out there who do not frequent escorts all the time. Given this, i wonder why some of them don`t use their power or influence to make life for escorts a little better and to not make life a hell for owners of massage parlors or escort agencies.
Aren`t there some terrorists to catch?
And unless they pay taxes, who gives a flying .... something.
I do agree with the claim to be a massage therapist while you are not. They are strict in the USA, and while getting caught as a sexworker is a misdemeanor , pretending to be a massage therapist is a felony ( i hope i got that one right).