NCNS threads

Is it customary for a ncns written in review form to be attached to a providers profile. I though the reason it is moved to coed is because its not a review if nothing happened. So are they reviews or not reviews?

They're not reviews. 9 times out of 10 the NCNS's written in the review format are our newer member or those who don't post much but decide to report.

but this is attached to her review list: http://eccie.net/showthread.php?p=10...post1053308049

as well as this: http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=511630

so I'll assume it's been like that for most of them... if they are not reviews but regular threads, do you know why they are attached to the provider's review list?

Probably because as soon as a member hit's "new review" when they should have hit "new thread" in the the coed forum, the system automatically see's the "thread" as a "review" before any Mods gets a chance to move it to the Coed section where NC/NS's belong


Just my guess...

oh ok, I assumed (I know what that gets) that reviews are manually assigned to providers, instead of the system automatically doing it. Thanks! OH 1 more question, if RTMed, will they be removed from the provider's review list?

oh ok, I assumed (I know what that gets) that reviews are manually assigned to providers, instead of the system automatically doing it. Thanks! Originally Posted by Luxury Daphne

They are manually assigned but as an example...every time a member does a "review", it gets added to his "review count" whether it's approved or not.

I was just saying that, and I don't know for sure, but maybe that's what happens when members hit "new review", I'm not totally sure. I will find out or if another Mod knows they can chime in

OH 1 more question, if RTMed, will they be removed from the provider's review list? Originally Posted by Luxury Daphne

Reviews can be "unassigned" but once we move NC/NS's to the coed after they have been posted as a "review", its still technically, to the system, a "review"...assigned or not

If I'm wrong, someone will correct me I'm sure

Thancks boo.

DeD is right..... It's a system thing for the most part, but from my understanding They are not supposed to be assigned to the list of reviews for that provider. The reason They go to coed is because there is always two sides of a story, and 9 times out of 10 it was an honest mistake that is rectified by the two parties.

But as far as being attached to each specific provider, They should not be. RTM the reviews assigned and we will remove them.

I will double check in the staff area, but I'm almost positive this is correct.

thanck you gentlemen