I took a break from reading several threads recently, and thought about the different views presented. Here’s what I think might be the bottom line in my opinion. I have been looking at it from the woman point of view.
One poster said but it should be from the guys point. So, let me give you a few scenarios and how it might affect the gents.
1. One guy reviews an amazon, 5’10”, blond, long legs & tits that stuck out further than her gut. He gives a great review but mentions something about her feet.
Hobbyist B loves tall, blonds so he is interested in her but he LOVES feet. So he goes to her site, finds a pic with feet and blows it up to see the feet. Thing is she was a ballerina since a kid and her feet are like mincemeat. Hobbyist B posts the pic on her good review ( I agree with his right to D.E.W. that- this is the truth.)
and says “I just threw up and would never see her” this from someone who would never see her. (here’s the part I don’t agree with)
Hobbyists C-Z+ are going to see this until she retires or the board dies.
………………………..
2. Guy goes to backpage and finds a young, sweet tender morsel and has an FBSM appt but they clicked and she “did it all” + greek. He paid 150., and he writes a review.
Someone sends her the review and she finds out that not only “does what happen in the bedroom, stays in the bedroom”..NOT and she has had calls from 10 guys wanting everything for 150. She reads the other reviews and sees what “did it all’ gets $$1/2 -300 and now she feels lower than snail slime.
She either quits, or becomes so jaded that she treats the next guys badly. (Really would you like to be the next guy she has an appt with?) Either way the rest of the hobbyists who could have had fabulous sessions with her in the future might have lost out on her.
3. Hobbyist A LOVES opera. Loves the music and the women. He loves his women voluptuous. Hell he loves them fat! However, if fat girls are shamed, made fun of etc. and hobbyists humiliated if they review the BBW by hobbyists who would never see her…. D.E.W. they have the right to deprive hobbyist A’s chance for several BBWs in his area.
4. An Oregon beauty is looking to travel and picked 5 cities around the US. She just spent the weekend reading the threads in those towns. She saw how the guys talk, what is allowed and how respectful or not they are to the ladies. Austin is crossed off the list when she reads the title,” look at who is coming to town” and fun made of a traveling gal.
Why would a gal put herself in the path of that when she could go somewhere friendlier?
Look when gals lose money, or bypass this area or quit or become jaded/or provide bad service… has that limited the future clients variety & quality of service?
……….does hobbyist A have the right to limit the selection of another hobbyist who sees a different type woman?
- Dagny D.E.W.
- 02-19-2011, 10:58 AM
- sixxbach
- 02-19-2011, 11:36 AM
I took a break from reading several threads recently, and thought about the different views presented. Here’s what I think might be the bottom line in my opinion. I have been looking at it from the woman point of view.I don't think quality or level is affected really Dagney. A smart gal will see a HUGE money making adventure and make sure she is on her A game and will smile to the bank and at the same time leave some hobbyists very happy!
One poster said but it should be from the guys point. So, let me give you a few scenarios and how it might affect the gents.
1. One guy reviews an amazon, 5’10”, blond, long legs & tits that stuck out further than her gut. He gives a great review but mentions something about her feet.
Hobbyist B loves tall, blonds so he is interested in her but he LOVES feet. So he goes to her site, finds a pic with feet and blows it up to see the feet. Thing is she was a ballerina since a kid and her feet are like mincemeat. Hobbyist B posts the pic on her good review ( I agree with his right to D.E.W. that- this is the truth.)
and says “I just threw up and would never see her” this from someone who would never see her. (here’s the part I don’t agree with)
Hobbyists C-Z+ are going to see this until she retires or the board dies.
………………………..
I could really care less what comment some guy makes. If I find the gal attractive to begin with some comment about feet, etc are not really going to change my mind. It is when the weight is much higher than advertised, outdated pics, etc. Hobbyists are smart enough to wade through the comments in reviews that are fluff and focus on what is truly important. I guess that is how men and women are different.
3. Hobbyist A LOVES opera. Loves the music and the women. He loves his women voluptuous. Hell he loves them fat! However, if fat girls are shamed, made fun of etc. and hobbyists humiliated if they review the BBW by hobbyists who would never see her…. D.E.W. they have the right to deprive hobbyist A’s chance for several BBWs in his area.
I have reviewed ALL kinds of providers. I have never had that issue with people knocking my reviews. I also clearly put the lady is BBW, etc. I think what happens is when hobbyists put the girl is curvy when in reality she is BBW. Nothing wrong with it but its more the hobbyists fault on that one IMO. If a guy wants to see someone, fuck what anyone else thinks. They are not paying for my session.
4. An Oregon beauty is looking to travel and picked 5 cities around the US. She just spent the weekend reading the threads in those towns. She saw how the guys talk, what is allowed and how respectful or not they are to the ladies. Austin is crossed off the list when she reads the title,” look at who is coming to town” and fun made of a traveling gal.
Why would a gal put herself in the path of that when she could go somewhere friendlier?
I don't know your definition of beauty is but based on what I consider a beauty... if a girl has the looks, TCB, and of course the skills that guys want... I doubt the phone won't be ringing or will have to worry about "unfriendly" comments. Hell, I had an issue with a traveling girls shitty TCB today. That is why girls like that have issues... shitty TCB
Look when gals lose money, or bypass this area or quit or become jaded/or provide bad service… has that limited the future clients variety & quality of service? Originally Posted by Dagny D.E.W.
sixx
- lisa.lisa0302
- 02-19-2011, 01:05 PM
Good thread
I look forward to reading the responses.
I look forward to reading the responses.
- Guest031411-2
- 02-19-2011, 01:44 PM
I took a break from reading several threads recently, and thought about the different views presented. Here’s what I think might be the bottom line in my opinion. I have been looking at it from the woman point of view.I understand your view point as the service provider. If negative reviews are posted they can impact a specific SP's business, much like Angie's List or the Better Business Bureau reports impacts other businesses. The subjectivity of looks desired makes this industry a bit different as you can't quantify by a simple "Yes, the plumber answered the phone, quoted me a price I agreed with, showed up on time, fixed the problem in 1 hour, left the place clean, and the repair has lasted 15 years"
One poster said but it should be from the guys point. So, let me give you a few scenarios and how it might affect the gents.
1. One guy reviews an amazon, 5’10”, blond, long legs & tits that stuck out further than her gut. He gives a great review but mentions something about her feet.
Hobbyist B loves tall, blonds so he is interested in her but he LOVES feet. So he goes to her site, finds a pic with feet and blows it up to see the feet. Thing is she was a ballerina since a kid and her feet are like mincemeat. Hobbyist B posts the pic on her good review ( I agree with his right to D.E.W. that- this is the truth.)
and says “I just threw up and would never see her” this from someone who would never see her. (here’s the part I don’t agree with)
Hobbyists C-Z+ are going to see this until she retires or the board dies.
………………………..
That scenario reinforces the need for hobbyist's to do their research, read the reviews, and not put much credence into comments that are Not Supported by a Review
2. Guy goes to backpage and finds a young, sweet tender morsel and has an FBSM appt but they clicked and she “did it all” + greek. He paid 150., and he writes a review.
Someone sends her the review and she finds out that not only “does what happen in the bedroom, stays in the bedroom”..NOT and she has had calls from 10 guys wanting everything for 150. She reads the other reviews and sees what “did it all’ gets $$1/2 -300 and now she feels lower than snail slime.
She either quits, or becomes so jaded that she treats the next guys badly. (Really would you like to be the next guy she has an appt with?) Either way the rest of the hobbyists who could have had fabulous sessions with her in the future might have lost out on her.
This scenario, to be somewhat blunt, indicates that she was never cut out for the industry.
3. Hobbyist A LOVES opera. Loves the music and the women. He loves his women voluptuous. Hell he loves them fat! However, if fat girls are shamed, made fun of etc. and hobbyists humiliated if they review the BBW by hobbyists who would never see her…. D.E.W. they have the right to deprive hobbyist A’s chance for several BBWs in his area.
It is a "We All Like Different Things" world.
4. An Oregon beauty is looking to travel and picked 5 cities around the US. She just spent the weekend reading the threads in those towns. She saw how the guys talk, what is allowed and how respectful or not they are to the ladies. Austin is crossed off the list when she reads the title,” look at who is coming to town” and fun made of a traveling gal.
Why would a gal put herself in the path of that when she could go somewhere friendlier?
As in any industry, she is free to peddle her wares where she likes. The traveling girls have historically not fared well in Austin under any perceived board climate. Heck, they start posts wondering what is up with Austin? and have set a tone for other traveling girls.
Look when gals lose money, or bypass this area or quit or become jaded/or provide bad service… has that limited the future clients variety & quality of service? Originally Posted by Dagny D.E.W.
However, this industry is constantly in flux. If one SP retires there seems to be a plethora of SP's entering. From a consumer view I don't see that an honest and frank exchange of information supported by a demonstrate history in reviews from different reviewers is a bad thing. If the continued demonstrated service level (and all that makes up it e.g. looks, appearance, TCB, bcd skills/menu) factored by cost is great, ok, lackluster, or other metrics the SP's will either survive or not. I haven't seen any limitations on current variety and quality. Over the last 5-years SP's have become jaded and left, and new ones with different qualities have replaced them. The turn-over cycle, in my opinion, is really a good thing for the consumer in this industry. If the SP's are becoming jaded or losing money and not willing to make a corrective change in their service level (appearance, TCB, bcd skills/menu, and appearance) then that should be a good sign that its time for them to move on.
- Whispers
- 02-19-2011, 01:52 PM
Your Thread Title is certainly not supported by your Post. Then again Sensation Titles will get the thread opened and viewed giving you a chance to spin something.
To directly answer the question, No hobbyist has the right to limit the selection of any other hobbyist.
That being said I disagree with you that it occurs.
Maybe.
None of your examples tend to support your theory though.
If that's the best that the time you've taken off has enabled you to come up with then WOW!... I expected more of you, Not the typical spin and distortion of the emotionally driven posters....
So disappointing.....
Look.....
Fat Girls advertising as escorts on ECCIE or anywhere else need to be in control of their feelings and if not avoid reading their reviews and the comments in the review sections. Guys are going to talk about them being Fat.
Old Women advertising as escorts on ECCIE or anywhere else need to be in control of their feelings and if not avoid reading their reviews and the comments in the review sections. Guys are going to talk about them being Old.
Ugly and/or Butterfaced girls advertising as escorts on ECCIE or anywhere else need to be in control of their feelings and if not avoid reading their reviews and the comments in the review sections. Guys are going to talk about them being Ugly and/or Butterfaced.
Absolutely Gorgeous girls advertising as escorts on ECCIE or anywhere else need to be in control of their feelings and if not avoid reading their reviews and the comments in the review sections. Because guys are going to talk about them being more then their looks. They are going to paint graphical pictures of the time spent.
Because sites like this will tear all of them apart emotionally. So if they can't handle it... .Get out.... There is no shortage of ladies entering the field.
On the other hand.....
ANY lady, spinners to BBWs,18 to senile, with good TCB and reasonable rates to services provided can build a business in a safer manner utilizing sites like this.
There is a market for any lady regardless of looks.
I'm percieved as the most vocal and negative poster on the board by a few of the local ladies..... but I don't disparage guys for seeing the fat, old or uglies.....
I HAVE been involved with a couple of long running feuds with a couple of ladies that practiced deceptive advertising and made a point it got out no matter how they tried to spin things. But I've never disparaged the guys that saw them for choosing them.
White Knighting is a different story.....
To directly answer the question, No hobbyist has the right to limit the selection of any other hobbyist.
That being said I disagree with you that it occurs.
I took a break from reading several threads recently, and thought about the different views presented. Here’s what I think might be the bottom line in my opinion. I have been looking at it from the woman point of view.
One poster said but it should be from the guys point. So, let me give you a few scenarios and how it might affect the gents.
Which Poster would that be? I'll slap him around for you.
Hopefully, having taken the time to sit back and give things some thought, your not making the same idiotic mistake a number of ladies do in trying to spin what I say into something it is not.
I'm a guy. I write what I write from my point of view as a Hobbyist/consumer. I don't try to put myself in a providers shoes much less her mind.
Men should review THEIR experiences in THEIR words and not try to gloss things over trying to make it palatable to the ladies
1. One guy reviews an amazon, 5’10”, blond, long legs & tits that stuck out further than her gut. He gives a great review but mentions something about her feet.
Hobbyist B loves tall, blonds so he is interested in her but he LOVES feet. So he goes to her site, finds a pic with feet and blows it up to see the feet. Thing is she was a ballerina since a kid and her feet are like mincemeat. Hobbyist B posts the pic on her good review ( I agree with his right to D.E.W. that- this is the truth.)
and says “I just threw up and would never see her” this from someone who would never see her. (here’s the part I don’t agree with)
Why don't you agree with that? You don't think the guys have a write to express their opinions?
Hobbyists C-Z+ are going to see this until she retires or the board dies.
………………………..
If the Provider provides good service at reasonable rates there will be those that will post an opinion contrary to Hobbyist B and c-z will see multiple opinions, view the site, assign the weight of those opinions to his decision making and make an informed decision knowing the pros and cons. The purpose of the board is fulfilled.
2. Guy goes to backpage and finds a young, sweet tender morsel and has an FBSM appt but they clicked and she “did it all” + greek. He paid 150., and he writes a review.
Someone sends her the review and she finds out that not only “does what happen in the bedroom, stays in the bedroom”..NOT and she has had calls from 10 guys wanting everything for 150. She reads the other reviews and sees what “did it all’ gets $$1/2 -300 and now she feels lower than snail slime.
She either quits, or becomes so jaded that she treats the next guys badly. (Really would you like to be the next guy she has an appt with?) Either way the rest of the hobbyists who could have had fabulous sessions with her in the future might have lost out on her.
A good example of why a lot of the ladies you describe as such tend to stay UTR and the guys seeing them keep it to themselves or share the info with a smaller set of similar like minded friends that also reciprocate.
However. I would never question that Hobbyist's right to write that review. I think everyone is familiar with the concept of YMMV. And he would get support from others as well.
Personally, I would counsel the guy AGAINST posting such a review and show him ways to share her in a more efficient manner.
What you described usually just leads to rate increases.
3. Hobbyist A LOVES opera. Loves the music and the women. He loves his women voluptuous. Hell he loves them fat! However, if fat girls are shamed, made fun of etc. and hobbyists humiliated if they review the BBW by hobbyists who would never see her…. D.E.W. they have the right to deprive hobbyist A’s chance for several BBWs in his area.
That shouldn't happen. To my knowledge it seldom does happen and people trying to humiliate that hobbyist due to their choice in Providers are typically issued warnings and/or pointed.
4. An Oregon beauty is looking to travel and picked 5 cities around the US. She just spent the weekend reading the threads in those towns. She saw how the guys talk, what is allowed and how respectful or not they are to the ladies. Austin is crossed off the list when she reads the title,” look at who is coming to town” and fun made of a traveling gal.
Why would a gal put herself in the path of that when she could go somewhere friendlier?
Austin is VERY welcoming of traveling girls. Some guys group up to extend offers and multiple bookings to traveling ladies to entice them to visit. A common practice for years. I haven't seen threads like what your talking about in general. You are distorting one or two threads trying to paint a picture that is inaccurate. a couple of threads have been in place to discourage the incessant whining of a couple of select visiting providers that post to coed simply to try to boost their appointments. We call bullshit where we see it..
Look when gals lose money, or bypass this area or quit or become jaded/or provide bad service… has that limited the future clients variety & quality of service? Originally Posted by Dagny D.E.W.
Maybe.
None of your examples tend to support your theory though.
If that's the best that the time you've taken off has enabled you to come up with then WOW!... I expected more of you, Not the typical spin and distortion of the emotionally driven posters....
So disappointing.....
Look.....
Fat Girls advertising as escorts on ECCIE or anywhere else need to be in control of their feelings and if not avoid reading their reviews and the comments in the review sections. Guys are going to talk about them being Fat.
Old Women advertising as escorts on ECCIE or anywhere else need to be in control of their feelings and if not avoid reading their reviews and the comments in the review sections. Guys are going to talk about them being Old.
Ugly and/or Butterfaced girls advertising as escorts on ECCIE or anywhere else need to be in control of their feelings and if not avoid reading their reviews and the comments in the review sections. Guys are going to talk about them being Ugly and/or Butterfaced.
Absolutely Gorgeous girls advertising as escorts on ECCIE or anywhere else need to be in control of their feelings and if not avoid reading their reviews and the comments in the review sections. Because guys are going to talk about them being more then their looks. They are going to paint graphical pictures of the time spent.
Because sites like this will tear all of them apart emotionally. So if they can't handle it... .Get out.... There is no shortage of ladies entering the field.
On the other hand.....
ANY lady, spinners to BBWs,18 to senile, with good TCB and reasonable rates to services provided can build a business in a safer manner utilizing sites like this.
There is a market for any lady regardless of looks.
I'm percieved as the most vocal and negative poster on the board by a few of the local ladies..... but I don't disparage guys for seeing the fat, old or uglies.....
I HAVE been involved with a couple of long running feuds with a couple of ladies that practiced deceptive advertising and made a point it got out no matter how they tried to spin things. But I've never disparaged the guys that saw them for choosing them.
White Knighting is a different story.....
- Vyt
- 02-19-2011, 02:34 PM
When this topic comes up, I find it helpful to just look at thread view counts. Note well: I am a dork. A professional dork at that (don't try this at home). Thus I have machines to do the heavy lifting for me.
The top 5 threads in views on Co-Ed this past 2 weeks, as easily displayed by this filter:
Old school providers, where are they now [atxrefman] / 19,252
What's up GeniusMan, do you have a scam [Whispers] / 5,844
Oh shit [blenderhead] / 4,762
What next [Whispers] / 4,564
New group in formation [Wyldeman30] / 3,877
What is going on around here? [snoopdogg] / 3,342
Please read, no booking here in Austin!!!!! [rachel raquel] / 2,834
Providers vs Strippers [Whispers] / 2,734
So taylor runs an AD [Whispers] / 2,560
Hey lets see if this works [Maci Lynn] / 2,459
So, looking at this, the top thread (which I am tempted to toss as a statistical outlier since it probably pings highly on searches) is on when the hell Anna Double Dutch is coming back. (Oh, and others, I suppose.)
Then we have Whispers, who - love him, hate him, or yap after his heels trying to be him - is certainly a polarizing influence, and the statistics show that. Out of the top 10 threads, in my wholly biased opinion, you have 1 interesting thought piece (providers vs. strippers), and 3 call-out threads (1 vs GeniusMan, 2 vs Taylor Maiden). Whispers likes call-out threads, even/especially when they are slightly thinly disguised (see the most recent one vs. Dagny). And, clearly, it's a significant part of the board based on traffic.
But not all. You have the end of the Leslie Lane saga of heroes (blenderhead's "oh shit i'm getting married and paying even more for sex with LL now" thread), Wyldeman30's discovering why most people turn off their iPhone's internet on 6th street, rachel raquel advertising for business via telling everyone she doesn't want their business, and finally, at the very bottom, a typically flirty thread from Maci Lynn.
Message: Austin likes drama. In general, not just via Whispers' finely honed delivery system.
Or does it? Let's look at some other thread counts from the same period:
Independent Reviews top 5:
Chelsea / 7,804
Mallory / 7,735
Cindy / 6,904
Mallory / 4,798
STAY AWAY / 3,599
Men's Lounge top 5:
[redacted] / 5,938
[redacted] / 5,398
[redacted] / 2,467
[redacted] / 2,432
[redacted] / 1,582
Welcome Wagon top 5:
Wyle E. Pamela / 11,306
Stevie Lynn / 2,367
SassyAndrea / 1,834
Regina Scott / 1,671
Dina Loveless / 1,670
So we can easily draw some conclusions:
* Wyle E. Pamela is going to be really hard to book time with.
* Co-Ed is roughly about as popular in traffic as Welcome Wagon (which tends to have far less content) and Men's Lounge (which by definition is limited in who can read it, at least theoretically).
* Independent Reviews is the most popular feature of the board. Well, that and saying hello to Wyle E. Pamela.
Given all that:
* Yes, drama will happen.
* Yes, there is a market for it.
* Yes, Whispers causes a lot of it.
* No, Whispers doesn't cause all of it, or even most.
* No, people will find the providers whom they are attracted to in spite of the drama (or in some cases because of it - hey, I'm attracted to fireballs myself)
Is it a problem? Only each person can answer that, and if they do in fact find the general atmosphere of Co-Ed Disc to be a problem, their responsibility is not to shout down the people they don't like or post yet another callout thread, but to act as an example of what *they* would like to see.
The top 5 threads in views on Co-Ed this past 2 weeks, as easily displayed by this filter:
Old school providers, where are they now [atxrefman] / 19,252
What's up GeniusMan, do you have a scam [Whispers] / 5,844
Oh shit [blenderhead] / 4,762
What next [Whispers] / 4,564
New group in formation [Wyldeman30] / 3,877
What is going on around here? [snoopdogg] / 3,342
Please read, no booking here in Austin!!!!! [rachel raquel] / 2,834
Providers vs Strippers [Whispers] / 2,734
So taylor runs an AD [Whispers] / 2,560
Hey lets see if this works [Maci Lynn] / 2,459
So, looking at this, the top thread (which I am tempted to toss as a statistical outlier since it probably pings highly on searches) is on when the hell Anna Double Dutch is coming back. (Oh, and others, I suppose.)
Then we have Whispers, who - love him, hate him, or yap after his heels trying to be him - is certainly a polarizing influence, and the statistics show that. Out of the top 10 threads, in my wholly biased opinion, you have 1 interesting thought piece (providers vs. strippers), and 3 call-out threads (1 vs GeniusMan, 2 vs Taylor Maiden). Whispers likes call-out threads, even/especially when they are slightly thinly disguised (see the most recent one vs. Dagny). And, clearly, it's a significant part of the board based on traffic.
But not all. You have the end of the Leslie Lane saga of heroes (blenderhead's "oh shit i'm getting married and paying even more for sex with LL now" thread), Wyldeman30's discovering why most people turn off their iPhone's internet on 6th street, rachel raquel advertising for business via telling everyone she doesn't want their business, and finally, at the very bottom, a typically flirty thread from Maci Lynn.
Message: Austin likes drama. In general, not just via Whispers' finely honed delivery system.
Or does it? Let's look at some other thread counts from the same period:
Independent Reviews top 5:
Chelsea / 7,804
Mallory / 7,735
Cindy / 6,904
Mallory / 4,798
STAY AWAY / 3,599
Men's Lounge top 5:
[redacted] / 5,938
[redacted] / 5,398
[redacted] / 2,467
[redacted] / 2,432
[redacted] / 1,582
Welcome Wagon top 5:
Wyle E. Pamela / 11,306
Stevie Lynn / 2,367
SassyAndrea / 1,834
Regina Scott / 1,671
Dina Loveless / 1,670
So we can easily draw some conclusions:
* Wyle E. Pamela is going to be really hard to book time with.
* Co-Ed is roughly about as popular in traffic as Welcome Wagon (which tends to have far less content) and Men's Lounge (which by definition is limited in who can read it, at least theoretically).
* Independent Reviews is the most popular feature of the board. Well, that and saying hello to Wyle E. Pamela.
Given all that:
* Yes, drama will happen.
* Yes, there is a market for it.
* Yes, Whispers causes a lot of it.
* No, Whispers doesn't cause all of it, or even most.
* No, people will find the providers whom they are attracted to in spite of the drama (or in some cases because of it - hey, I'm attracted to fireballs myself)
Is it a problem? Only each person can answer that, and if they do in fact find the general atmosphere of Co-Ed Disc to be a problem, their responsibility is not to shout down the people they don't like or post yet another callout thread, but to act as an example of what *they* would like to see.
- Whispers
- 02-19-2011, 03:22 PM
* No, people will find the providers whom they are attracted to in spite of the drama (or in some cases because of itJust repeating the relevant minus the analytics.... Cool Stuff though.....
Is it a problem? Only each person can answer that, and if they do in fact find the general atmosphere of Co-Ed Disc to be a problem, their responsibility is not to shout down the people they don't like or post yet another callout thread, but to act as an example of what *they* would like to see. Originally Posted by Vyt
Or are the analytics meant to display I'm not at the top of my game and I need to step it up?
- saj1000
- 02-19-2011, 03:41 PM
Look when gals lose money, or bypass this area or quit or become jaded/or provide bad service… has that limited the future clients variety & quality of service? Originally Posted by Dagny D.E.W.Are you saying we should overpay for bad service and keep our mouths shut to allow the providers to make their money without criticism?
What a great business this could be if the pesky clients didn't get in the way of your collective financial success.
Also, we're men...we like to rib each other! It's all part of the fun.
Sorry, had to edit my post to add....
- Whispers
- 02-19-2011, 03:54 PM
Are you saying we should overpay for bad service and keep our mouths shut to allow the providers to make their money without criticism?WOW!
What a great business this could be if the pesky clients didn't get in the way of your collective financial success.
Originally Posted by saj1000
I'm so incredibly impressed!
Not long ago I was busting your balls and here I am amazed at such an incredibly astute observation...... basically she said exactly that in another thread! I quoted it here http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=178511
- Guest031411-2
- 02-19-2011, 03:57 PM
Are you saying we should overpay for bad service and keep our mouths shut to allow the providers to make their money without criticism?Impressive summary!
What a great business this could be if the pesky clients didn't get in the way of your collective financial success. Originally Posted by saj1000
- saj1000
- 02-19-2011, 03:58 PM
Whispers...how appropos...I am about to comment on Sixx's latest....
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=178801
It is TFF!
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=178801
It is TFF!
- Dagny D.E.W.
- 02-19-2011, 10:01 PM
Are you saying we should overpay for bad service and keep our mouths shut to allow the providers to make their money without criticism?Nope I'm all for you weeding out the truely bad gals. Better for the guys and the gals.
....
Also, we're men...we like to rib each other! It's all part of the fun.
Originally Posted by saj1000
I’m all for the truth, (I didn’t see a link to where I said “D.E.W. not tell the truth”. I’m talking about the delivery, I’m talking rudeness. ****disclaimer
You have the LR where you can scratch your balls and curse and spit. But when you come into the co-ed why can’t you put on your company faces & use some respect? I’m talking honey and vinagar.
Here is an example of just a tinsy, tiny speck of respect to show to your fellow board member. When you address them, you spell their name correctly. I can’t spell Whisper, “whipser” even tho the fingers type it sometimes. I take the time to change it. Just little things like that.
I guess my bottom, bottom line is I’m trying to get the guys to remember that they are talking mostly to very young sometimes innocent, who get their feelings hurt easily. They have the right to expect the guys to be somewhat considerate of their feelings. And that you don’t have the right to make them cry. That constructive critism is one thing, being mean is another.
But see that is the thing with communication. It helps to know the goal is. See I was fighting to have a board where we can welcome the ladies who choose this life, the gals “mother hen” them…. teach them about references & some TBC skills, the guys treat them fairly help them learn some other facets of the biz. They become quality providers for many years. Happy ladies make better sessions in the long run. My mistake on the direction of the board.
But then with some communication in this thread I see that the goal is to use the “tender morsels” up quickly like Kleenex because there are always more behind them.
Thanks for clearing that up. In 10 years I haven’t met guys who thought like this, Ladies, Texas men are usually gentlemen, truely. (What “wuss” board D.E.W. you recommend.)
Because you are right, this is a guy board and it is up to the guys to say what is here and what tone & attitudes go on here.
The guy readers do not have to D.E.W…… nothing.
If you like the way Sixx & Whispers want the board to go, read all their threads, raise their count, rate their threads highest & press the like button under their posts.
However, if you like a kinder & gentler board that is flirty and lighthearted then even if you never post you can let the board know the direction YOU want it to go:
1. Re-read the posting guidelines particularly #1 and #3.
2. Press the like button under all those you agree with,
3. Rate the threads good and bad and
4. Most of all every single time that a poster slams another person and you feel that it is negative or out of line in regards to #1 and #3 then HIT THE RTM button (small red triangle under every post) and let the “board” know that that poster … “ is out of line & DOES NOT SPEAK IN YOUR NAME. See posting guidelines #1 and #3.”
My guess is that deep down YOU have a respect for women, that you love woman ….. Your mothers, your wives, girlfriends and daughters (we here are all of those) and the men I have met over the years would be sickened by guys blasting the women who are here. We surely didn’t sign up for that.
So I will quit beating my head against the 180 degree turn that several want it to be. It's your board!
- Rand Al'Thor
- 02-19-2011, 10:19 PM
Vyt, that deserves a thread of its own.
- Sexy Roxanne
- 02-19-2011, 10:33 PM
I could really care less if someone is talking about me being fat...It's not like your saying something I dont already know. I never try to say that I am skinny or average. I am a pretty open book when it comes to my size and weight. Chunky, fat, big, tall, BBW I am all of that BUT at least I am a pretty 'all of that" and PROUD. Most of the people that will talk down on someone are people that would never see you anyways OR that you would ever see.
But anywho that is why I am always up front about my size, because I do NOT want someone showing up thinking I am something I am NOT. My size it NOT everyones cup of tea...however for some it is
But anywho that is why I am always up front about my size, because I do NOT want someone showing up thinking I am something I am NOT. My size it NOT everyones cup of tea...however for some it is
- Whispers
- 02-19-2011, 10:46 PM
Nope I'm all for you weeding out the truely bad gals. Better for the guys and the gals.It is no one person's board.
I’m all for the truth, (I didn’t see a link to where I said “D.E.W. not tell the truth”. I’m talking about the delivery, I’m talking rudeness. ****disclaimer
Of course you didn't.....
You have the LR where you can scratch your balls and curse and spit. But when you come into the co-ed why can’t you put on your company faces & use some respect? I’m talking honey and vinagar.
Respect is given where it is due...... A few have put themselves out there is a situation not deserving....
Here is an example of just a tinsy, tiny speck of respect to show to your fellow board member. When you address them, you spell their name correctly. I can’t spell Whisper, “whipser” even tho the fingers type it sometimes. I take the time to change it. Just little things like that.
Did you bother correcting others for it or just root them on?
I guess my bottom, bottom line is I’m trying to get the guys to remember that they are talking mostly to very young sometimes innocent, who get their feelings hurt easily. They have the right to expect the guys to be somewhat considerate of their feelings. And that you don’t have the right to make them cry. That constructive critism is one thing, being mean is another.
There is no meanness directed at the young and innocent.... the only ones in an uproar about anything are older and far from innocent far more guilty of taking advantage of the young ones around here...
But see that is the thing with communication. It helps to know the goal is. See I was fighting to have a board where we can welcome the ladies who choose this life, the gals “mother hen” them…. teach them about references & some TBC skills, the guys treat them fairly help them learn some other facets of the biz. They become quality providers for many years. Happy ladies make better sessions in the long run.
That is happening for the most part..... It's just that SOME of ya'lls roles have been replaced by others and the new gals seem to be finding their way without your meddling...
But then with some communication in this thread I see that the goal is to use the “tender morsels” up quickly like Kleenex because there are always more behind them.
There is a definite..."Get it while the Getting is good mentality at play"... No arguing that....
Thanks for clearing that up. In 10 years I haven’t met guys who thought like this, Ladies, Texas men are usually gentlemen, truely. (What “wuss” board D.E.W. you recommend.)
Because you are right, this is a guy board and it is up to the guys to say what is here and what tone & attitudes go on here.
The guy readers do not have to D.E.W…… nothing.
If you like the way Sixx & Whispers want the board to go, read all their threads, raise their count, rate their threads highest & press the like button under their posts.
Up until a week ago it was Whispers.... Now it's Sixx and Whispers.... How does he deserve equal billing with me?
However, if you like a kinder & gentler board that is flirty and lighthearted then even if you never post you can let the board know the direction YOU want it to go:
1. Re-read the posting guidelines particularly #1 and #3.
2. Press the like button under all those you agree with,
3. Rate the threads good and bad and
4. Most of all every single time that a poster slams another person and you feel that it is negative or out of line in regards to #1 and #3 then HIT THE RTM button (small red triangle under every post) and let the “board” know that that poster … “ is out of line & DOES NOT SPEAK IN YOUR NAME. See posting guidelines #1 and #3.”
And hopefully the owners will keep delivering the same message they have for the last year...... "Quit Whining, grow up and be adults about things.... We are not your mommies..."
My guess is that deep down YOU have a respect for women, that you love woman …..
I certainly do....
Your mothers, your wives, girlfriends and daughters (we here are all of those)
That's not remotely true lady....And that's where you try to over glamorize yourself and put yourself in a different light..... I doubt many of us have mother's, wives, girlfriends or daughters that escort for a living....
and the men I have met over the years would be sickened by guys blasting the women who are here. We surely didn’t sign up for that.
Many of the men you have met over the years are still around..... and obviously letting things go....
So I will quit beating my head against the 180 degree turn that several want it to be. It's your board! Originally Posted by Dagny D.E.W.
here is a community here thriving... growing... enjoying themselves.. having fun... socializing.... etc.....
You and a few others refuse to adapt..... So it goes on without you....
Your choice.....
But over the next 30 days there will be a couple of parties.... over 100 guys and 20-25 providers and 20-25 strippers will attend... People will have fun and this community will continue to grow....
There will be a dozen or so smaller get togethers of guys and girls with common interests..... People will have fun and this community will continue to grow....
There will be 50-70 new threads that are fun and flirtatious for those that participate..... People will have fun and this community will continue to grow....
You and a few others refuse to adapt..... So it goes on without you....
Your choice.....