I have seen one of these ladies on BP repeatedly for months at least. They look pretty promising but I have never seen a review of them here and even the new girls eventually all end up making it here. I would not mind giving the both a try but since they have been around a while, both for months, without a review here......I don't know. Guys take a look. If any of you have enjoyed your time with one or both - please review for me. I would really appreciate it and if they have a profile here - sorry - I missed it. I work overseas for months at a time and am coming home for a few weeks (next week). If any of these girls are worth it - please review. I want to setup some time.
#1 Girl: http://biloxi.backpage.com/FemaleEsc...y-girl/6531962
#2 Girl: http://biloxi.backpage.com/FemaleEsc...talian/7508789
#3 Girl: http://biloxi.backpage.com/FemaleEsc...leader/7333443
- Vachon
- 08-05-2016, 02:08 AM
- JustaGuyinMS
- 08-05-2016, 02:28 AM
Hey Vachon:
I don't know any of them, but #2 says "no longer in Biloxi," and I'm suspicious of #3. When I see a phone number shown as (228)xxxxxxx, I suspect that it's our Coast agency, which is a great place for bait and switch and upsell. You'll see the numbers shown that way in a lot of ads. Only difference with this one is the use of the @.
Good luck!
JaG
I don't know any of them, but #2 says "no longer in Biloxi," and I'm suspicious of #3. When I see a phone number shown as (228)xxxxxxx, I suspect that it's our Coast agency, which is a great place for bait and switch and upsell. You'll see the numbers shown that way in a lot of ads. Only difference with this one is the use of the @.
Good luck!
JaG
- Vachon
- 08-05-2016, 06:10 AM
Yeah, number 3 always looked a little to "bait and switchy" to me too. #1 and #2 have always looked really interesting though. Both have claimed to be indys before - especially #2. I prefer indys. I have spoken to too many girls who had previously worked for agencies or worst even - pimps. They work for the money while the agency or pimp takes way too much of it just to deliver them to a location or answer a phone. She worked for it - I prefer she get to keep it. All that being said - both have claimed to be indys and are pretty much what I look for if the pics are real. I always assumed both would eventually find their way to this forum where I would definitely begin to trust their ads and reviews a lot more.
- Lonelytraveler88
- 08-16-2016, 02:16 PM
I searched the number in ad 1 on BP and found it used for different girls. I would be cautious of it.
- Sven.c
- 08-16-2016, 03:37 PM
#1 and #3 have both been called out on previous BP "Buyer Beware" ads as non-legit. I've searched the numbers and found multiple ads too. I would avoid.
Now #2. She's real. I've spoken to her on the phone for about 20 mins. 19.5 of those minutes were her rattling off all kinds of drunken non-sense. Harmless silly stuff. She could not host without me springing for the hotel. I'm an incall only guy and her ad at the time (this was about 2 months ago) was not specific. She was platinum blonde (think Madonna mid-80s) and now is brunette. She sounded like fun but I knew I couldn't meet her that night 30 seconds in to the phone call. She is real. Pics have landmarks etc. She identified her location on the phone too. I would see her in an incall situation.
Now #2. She's real. I've spoken to her on the phone for about 20 mins. 19.5 of those minutes were her rattling off all kinds of drunken non-sense. Harmless silly stuff. She could not host without me springing for the hotel. I'm an incall only guy and her ad at the time (this was about 2 months ago) was not specific. She was platinum blonde (think Madonna mid-80s) and now is brunette. She sounded like fun but I knew I couldn't meet her that night 30 seconds in to the phone call. She is real. Pics have landmarks etc. She identified her location on the phone too. I would see her in an incall situation.
- yimmerz
- 03-17-2017, 10:59 AM
are y'all getting the censored message when attempting to access backpage? I haven't been on in a while, but it could just be me. Also, are there any AMPs in Hattiesburg? All the ones I've seen are in flowood or Jackson
- aNameinGulfport
- 03-18-2017, 05:51 PM
BP is having a pissing contest with Uncle Sammy. Or something like this.
So yea, the adult BP pages are marked with a censor warning.
The new page for some of our activities is
http://biloxi.backpage.com/WomenSeek...?category=4453
and you have to confirm you are legal age before you can proceed.
All of this complicates things.
So yea, the adult BP pages are marked with a censor warning.
The new page for some of our activities is
http://biloxi.backpage.com/WomenSeek...?category=4453
and you have to confirm you are legal age before you can proceed.
All of this complicates things.
- A1.
- 01-01-2018, 01:06 AM
I searched the number in ad 1 on BP and found it used for different girls. I would be cautious of it. Originally Posted by Lonelytraveler88Thanks
- Cravinhead69
- 01-01-2018, 08:01 AM
The links you provider only take you to a censored page.
If you go directly to biloxi.backpage.com/womenseekmen
it will load the page correctly, you click on the disclaimer and then the ad page comes up showing just phone numbers, click on gallery and it loads the ads showing the photos. Not censored.
Since the links you provided don't work, I can't see which ladies you are inquiring about.
I do know that one of the blondes with 228-243-6259 is a robber from what has been reported on another escort site and Roadlizard met her long time ago, and said avoid her.
If you go directly to biloxi.backpage.com/womenseekmen
it will load the page correctly, you click on the disclaimer and then the ad page comes up showing just phone numbers, click on gallery and it loads the ads showing the photos. Not censored.
Since the links you provided don't work, I can't see which ladies you are inquiring about.
I do know that one of the blondes with 228-243-6259 is a robber from what has been reported on another escort site and Roadlizard met her long time ago, and said avoid her.