Obama: Socialist Party Membership Confirmed

joe bloe's Avatar
Evidence has been discovered by National Review Online that Obama did formally join The New Party in 1996. The New Party was a socialist/communist party based in Chicago. Obama joined when he was running for state senate in Illinois. Obama's representative had previously denied Obama's membership, calling the accusation a "crackpot smear".

From National Review Online:

On the evening of January 11, 1996, while Mitt Romney was in the final years of his run as the head of, Barack Obama formally joined the New Party, which was deeply hostile to the mainstream of the Democratic party and even to American capitalism. In 2008, candidate Obama deceived the American public about his potentially damaging tie to this third party. The issue remains as fresh as today’s headlines, as Romney argues that Obama is trying to move the United States toward European-style social democracy, which was precisely the New Party’s goal.

http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...-stanley-kurtz#
CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 06-07-2012, 01:39 PM
if the national review said so it must be true


LOL
joe bloe's Avatar
if the national review said so it must be true


LOL Originally Posted by CJ7
Yes, I'm glad to see you've seen the light. We've got another convert. The angels are singing.
Guest123018-4's Avatar
I think the information came from the minutes of the meeting on a specific date as recorded by "the New Party".
I am sure some of you will require seeing the actual minutes but it really isn't telling me something I did not already know.
joe bloe's Avatar
I think the information came from the minutes of the meeting on a specific date as recorded by "the New Party".
I am sure some of you will require seeing the actual minutes but it really isn't telling me something I did not already know. Originally Posted by The2Dogs
For the true believers, no evidence will be sufficient to prove Obama's a socialist. The truth is, if Obama admitted he was a socialist, most of his supporters wouldn't care.
CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 06-07-2012, 02:26 PM
the socialist party is on RECORD saying Obama isnt a socialist ...

aside from all the conspiracy bullshit trumped up by rightwing idiots, what more do you want ?
CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 06-07-2012, 02:29 PM
Billy Wharton should be happy.

"Socialized health care" is on its way. The "socialist agenda" is taking over America. And best of all, Barack Obama, a "committed socialist ideologue," is in the Oval Office.

But Wharton, co-chair of the Socialist Party USA, sees no reason to celebrate. He's seen people with bumper stickers and placards that call Obama a socialist, and he has a message for them: Obama isn't a socialist. He's not even a liberal.

"We didn't see a great victory with the election of Barack Obama," Wharton says, " and we certainly didn't see our agenda move from the streets to the White House."


of course youre not satisfied are you?

no, becasue youre idiots.
wish you could find something from Fact check.org to post here.
joe bloe's Avatar
Billy Wharton should be happy.

"Socialized health care" is on its way. The "socialist agenda" is taking over America. And best of all, Barack Obama, a "committed socialist ideologue," is in the Oval Office.

But Wharton, co-chair of the Socialist Party USA, sees no reason to celebrate. He's seen people with bumper stickers and placards that call Obama a socialist, and he has a message for them: Obama isn't a socialist. He's not even a liberal.

"We didn't see a great victory with the election of Barack Obama," Wharton says, " and we certainly didn't see our agenda move from the streets to the White House."


of course youre not satisfied are you?

no, becasue youre idiots. Originally Posted by CJ7

"no, becasue youre idiots"

Do I even need to comment on that. I think it speaks for itself.
joe bloe's Avatar
wish you could find something from Fact check.org to post here. Originally Posted by ekim008
If Factcheck.org said Marx wasn't a Marxist, you'd believe it.
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
So the Socialist party is credible, and National Review is not, even when they have proof that Obama joined a socialist political party, i.e., the "New Party."

Nope, They will deny that Obama is a socialist up until he brings us to a communist utopia in the model of the old Soviet Union.
CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 06-07-2012, 02:45 PM
"no, becasue youre idiots"

Do I even need to comment on that. I think it speaks for itself. Originally Posted by joe bloe

the sociaist party says Obama isnt a socialist and has been saying so since he was elected 4 years ago, yet you continue to comment on THAT posting trumped up horseshit from rightwing rags

if you dont want people to think youre an idiot then stop being one
CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 06-07-2012, 02:52 PM
bailing out for profit businesses like banks and car builders makes Obie a socialist and those that think so, idiots.

LOL
joe bloe's Avatar
the sociaist party says Obama isnt a socialist and has been saying so since he was elected 4 years ago, yet you continue to comment on THAT posting trumped up horseshit from rightwing rags

if you dont want people to think youre an idiot then stop being one Originally Posted by CJ7
The National Review was founded by William F Buckley, Jr in 1955. It has an impeccable reputation for honesty and journalistic integrity; National Review Online has carried on that tradition. It is not a right wing rag. This is not Alex Jones or even World Net Daily.

There are none so blind as those who will not see.
joe bloe's Avatar
bailing out for profit businesses like banks and car builders makes Obie a socialist and those that think so, idiots.

LOL Originally Posted by CJ7
It's clear that you've gone off your meds again. That last post doesn't make any sense at all.