private parts ok for ads but not providers?

often a provider or hobbiest will get chastised for posting pics of genitalia either mild or wild and the pics are removed. personally it is not a big deal whether it is allowed or not but i find it odd the some of the pics on the ad for eros web are of the hustler spread eagle no holes barred variety. just seems like if that is ok then it should be ok for everyone

I agree with you.

Although sometimes I wish there was an option to turn those off too. Sometimes I want to cruise the site discreetly but there seems to be a naked monkey shot lady on all parts of the page. Which is ok with me in most situations, but not so much here.

Gimme,

If you click the lil arrow at the top right of the eros web or any other of the ad boxes on the left side of the screen it minimizes the box. That way you don't have to view the ad everytime you log on.

Thank you very much....I didn't know that.......lol

Gratutitous monkey shot inspired ads for everyone. I have no complaints in light of this new tidbit of info.

If any provider would like to post pics such as this, post them on your personal website in protest of the no gentalia rule here.....ill support your right to free expression. Its the least I can do.

I ask the same question here http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=218571 but never did get an answer. It does seem to be a double standard.

Gimme,
If you click the lil arrow at the top right of the eros web or any other of the ad boxes on the left side of the screen it minimizes the box. That way you don't have to view the ad everytime you log on. Originally Posted by MsElena

Seems like everytime I log in, I have to minimize those again. (I do it to hopefully speed up the screen re-fresh.)

Are you talking about the webcam ads here? I do know is that the site (ECCIE) has no control over the type of pictures that the models on the webcam sites uses as their profile pic. They also don't have any control on the ads that are displayed unless they decide to take the ads down all together. All it is an affiliate code that generates random LIVE models. I'm a porn blogger (it's a hobby) and an affiliate for naked.com (eros does not have a camsite .. it's just a naked.com cobrand they implemented on their site) so I have good knowledge about the way the affiliate programs work.

I will say this though. If eccie get enough complaints about the ads, they'll probably take it down BUT if they're making the figures that I imagine they're making from the "eroscams" ad.. then I doubt they'll remove it because of a few complaints.

i should have just continued on that thread. anyways i am neither in need of the graphic shots or in any way against them i just don't get why it is ok in eros ad or sometimes in showcase but not in regular postings. either its ok or it is not

I ask the same question here http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=218571 but never did get an answer. It does seem to be a double standard. Originally Posted by Budman

Like another guy said on that thread, money talks, rules walk. LOL!

I don't think anyone is complaining about the nudity in the ads but rather the fact that ECCIE Providers are not allowed to post the same type of pics. Since this is an adult board I see no reason to limit the pics. JMO.

First, the owners and managers can do with THEIR site (eccie) what ever they like. Likewise we can choose to use it or not.

They do have control over what is put on any of the adds, they can establish policy or reject the adds.

The bottom line: Money talks. Talk is cheap.

Gee Bull that is deep. Thanks for the clarification. It all makes sense now.

I kind of like it when it's allowed. Not because I really get any erotic charge out of it but because it kinda of lets me know a little about the personality of the provider by the ads she puts in. If she opens up and shows the world usually she is that way in a session. Now before I get crap from this I realize it's not always the case. Sometimes they show nothing and are total animals in session. Probably most of the time though.