DON'T EXPECT CANDY CROWLEY TO BE A FAIR MODERATOR...

She is a liberal...she works for a liberal news outlet which is biased against Republicans....she controls the questions and follow ups that the candidates will get....................look for her to swing things in Obama's favor.....

Why does the GOP agree to these obviously liberal moderators ?

So an Ann Coulter would be a better choice?

LMAO!! You scared Whirl? Lowering expectations already?

If Obama is such a horrible debater who can't stand to being pressed on his record as you all said last debate, what difference will the moderator make? LOL.

So an Ann Coulter would be a better choice? Originally Posted by pyramider

A Rhesus monkey would have been a better choice. Does Crowley actually do serious news? She's always featured in CNN's bizarre and silly news segments.

Crowley's role is supposed to that of a moderator -- not an inquisitor. As long as she sticks to controlling the speakers' time and doesn't interject her personality into the debate, things will go well.

She is a liberal...she works for a liberal news outlet which is biased against Republicans....she controls the questions and follow ups that the candidates will get....................look for her to swing things in Obama's favor.....

Why does the GOP agree to these obviously liberal moderators ? Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Weren't you whining about Martha?

No I never posted a comment about her moderating; but it is obvious she interrupted Ryan, questioned Ryan, and overall favored Biden in the debate.

No I never posted a comment about her moderating; but it is obvious she interrupted Ryan, questioned Ryan, and overall favored Biden in the debate. Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Pauie was interrupted because he didnt answer the question .. and still hasnt

Oh, stop acting like a bunch of whiney-ass bitches. You guys cry about the liberal media every time you read or hear something that doesn't fit with your preconceived whacko ideology. Eat shit.

Oh, stop acting like a bunch of whiney-ass bitches. You guys cry about the liberal media every time you read or hear something that doesn't fit with your preconceived whacko ideology. Eat shit. Originally Posted by timpage

In a rare example of political unity, both the Romney and Obama campaigns have expressed concern to the Commission on Presidential Debates about how the moderator of this Tuesday’s town hall has publicly described her role, TIME has learned.
http://thepage.time.com/2012/10/14/m...#ixzz29KlglZqh

So, dipshit, are you doing a prophylactic whine-off right now?

I suppose you're expecting it to be all over tomorrow night. If Obama comes out swinging, you can pretty well figure it will be.

Romney is Doug Neidermeyer, a rich bully who will come across as such in front of real folks.

Moderator won't make much of a difference. But if you think Biden was worthy of criticism for his body language last week, just wait until Mitthead tries to move around the townhall.

It's going to be ugly.

So I guess you'd better lay down your layer of excuses now, boys.

Everybody but you, Dipshit of the Year. You have no excuse.

If they wanted to make it a real debate, they'd include Gary Johnson.

... interrupted because he didnt answer the question .. and still hasnt Originally Posted by CJ7

You mean Bidenoxious's questions ...

I agree, Gary Johnson should be invited. I like him. He's not a fucking loony like the Lake Jackson pussy doc.

Unfortunately, Johnson has no funding, no national organization and no supporters living above ground.

Why does the GOP agree to these obviously liberal moderators ? Originally Posted by Whirlaway

You really have no idea what the role of a true moderator is do you? It is my guess that you have not read up at all about this debate. Here let me enlighten you a bit.The town-hall debate is planned for Oct. 16 at 9 p.m. E.T. at Hofstra University in Hempstead, N.Y.

According to the debate-format language in the agreement, after each audience question and two-minute responses from the candidates, Obama and Romney are expected to have an additional discussion facilitated by Crowley. Yet her participation is meant to be limited. As stated in the document, “In managing the two-minute comment periods, the moderator will not rephrase the question or open a new topic …[The moderator will not ask follow-up questions or comment on either the questions asked by the audience or the answers of the candidates during the debate or otherwise intervene in the debate except to acknowledge the questioners from the audience or enforce the time limits, and invite candidate comments during the two-minute response period.”

You can read more here, that is if you do read anything....

http://thepage.time.com/2012/10/14/m...re-the-debate/

More dribbling bullshit-blather from the pile of bullshit AKA Assup! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

.