Court tosses sex-for-World Series-tickets conviction against Pa. woman
(See Commonwealth v. Finkelstein ). The court in this case declares payment mistress-lovers relationship to be gifts and not income. (See UNITED STATES of America, v. Lynnette HARRIS and Leigh Ann Conley .) In this case, the NY court ruled that mistress-lovers relationship is non-commercial and it was not the legislators’ intent to outlaw this relationship when they enacted the prostitution statutes. (See Cherry vs Koch ) These rulings don’t apply to escorts because they are in commercial relationships with their clients. (See IDK, INC., vs COUNTY of CLARK ).
![Trampoline](images/smilies/modern/trampoline.gif)