“The day after it happened, I acknowledged that this was an act of terrorism.”
— President Obama, remarks at a news conference, May 13, 2013
You are welcome CM; your [sic] not that good at sarcasm...............what would you like me to post,,,,tell me your wish list,,,,your do's and don't's..............Thanks, and you're (not "your") welcome!
Your [sic] such a whiny cry baby................you don't like my posts, then my advice is to stop bumping them....it is that simple !
But thanks for the opportunity to keep my thread at the top of the Sandbox board....
Keep up the good work........... Originally Posted by Whirlaway
How is that "Insect For Dinner" thread working out for ya ?As far as I'm concerned, it's "working out for me" just fine! I think it's the sort of interesting little tidbit that this forum's intended for. Read the forum description at the top of the page! It's obviously not a topic people are going to debate, so whether anyone responds is immaterial.
"If they told the truth about Benghazi that it was a terrorist attack by an al Qaeda-affiliated group, it would have destroyed the false image of competence that was the basis of his campaign for re-election. They lied.”Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/14/ch...#ixzz2THt7AkL6
Benghazi isn't a "strained" scandal; either is the IRS profiling... Originally Posted by WhirlawayInsisting that Obama's failure to immediately label Benghazi a "terrorist act" is somehow a scandal IS strained.
Anything else idiot ? Originally Posted by WhirlawayYes, you're an attention-craving shit-for-brains.
You are the one who called it a scandal you idiot..................I repeated your own words back to you...............ExNYer did not call this a scandal. He said that you have a thirst for a scandal. If you're suffering while stranded in the desert, you will almost certainly have a thirst for water. That doesn't mean there's a bottle of water in front of you, now, does it?
I called it a "LIE"............
You obviously don't know how to read...................much less interpret and critically analyze.
BTW, where did I "insist Obama was behind the IRS" profiling..............he may or may not be, time will tell,,,but he definitely green lighted the IRS profiling actions...his words, his comments, his war on the Tea Party and conservative Americans.....we had his own DHS telling Americans to be afraid of patriotic groups because they represented a bigger terrorist threat than Islam.
If you had any balls, you would provide a link to support your stupid claim...again, you can't read, you can't analyze....................you are a dummy. Originally Posted by Whirlaway
Insisting that Obama's failure to immediately label Benghazi a "terrorist act" is somehow a scandal IS strained.I never called called it a scandal; I called it a LIE ! But no doubt it is one of many Obama lies wrapped up in the Benghazi scandal !
Originally Posted by ExNYer
The Pinocchio Test
During the campaign, the president could just get away with claiming he said “act of terror,” since he did use those words — though not in the way he often claimed. It seemed like a bit of after-the-fact spin, but those were his actual words — to the surprise of Mitt Romney in the debate.
But the president’s claim that he said “act of terrorism” is taking revisionist history too far, given that he repeatedly refused to commit to that phrase when asked directly by reporters in the weeks after the attack. He appears to have gone out of his way to avoid saying it was a terrorist attack, so he has little standing to make that claim now.
Indeed, the initial unedited talking points did not call it an act of terrorism. Instead of pretending the right words were uttered, it would be far better to acknowledge that he was echoing what the intelligence community believed at the time--and that the administration’s phrasing could have been clearer and more forthright from the start.
Four Pinocchios