Encounter: Darling Disapoints

Date: 5/24/2019
Name: Ms. Deborah Darling
Phone: (785)550-8650
Email Address: MsDeborah30@yahoo.com
URL / Website: https://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=2592287
City: Kansas City
State: Missouri
Address: Downtown Area
Activities: LFK, BBBJ, K9
Hair Length and Color: Brown/In Bun
Age: 35
Smoking Status: I Couldn't Tell
Ethnic Background: White/Caucasian
Physical Description: MM tits, bruised up on the arms, legs are very, very swelled.
The pictures in her bio are nothing like she is today.
Recommendation: No

Sorry Man, I'd seen her several times awhile back and had a steller time. Sad to take her off my list.

I've been wanting to meet up with her for years and unfortunately didn't have a great experience. She did give me a discount for wasting my time.

Besides the arms and legs. How was she not like her pictures?

She has just aged and all those pictures are years old. It's a risk I took on someone who has used the same pictures for years.

I personally won't see anyone that hasn't updated their pictures in the last 3 months.
Providers expect 2 references, we should expect recent pictures as a minimum.

She has just aged and all those pictures are years old. It's a risk I took on someone who has used the same pictures for years.

I personally won't see anyone that hasn't updated their pictures in the last 3 months.
Providers expect 2 references, we should expect recent pictures as a minimum. Originally Posted by the-kc-man

Lots of luck with that thought.

Definitely...you'll just have to spend a few more $$ whether that's with Winter, KKTBG, Ellie, etc. At least they take pictures quite often.

I find this disturbing. She's been absent for about two months (by absent, I mean no communication on this site and no reviews), and then last week she suddenly reappears. By all accounts, she has been everyone's darling. And now this? I have some time with her this Sunday. I think I will TOFTT and see what's going on with this lady that we have all adored for some time. Thanks for this first intel. Review to be forthcoming.

She has just aged and all those pictures are years old. It's a risk I took on someone who has used the same pictures for years.

I personally won't see anyone that hasn't updated their pictures in the last 3 months.
Providers expect 2 references, we should expect recent pictures as a minimum. Originally Posted by the-kc-man

And how are you gonna know when a picture was updated as there are no date stamps on them.
And these chicks take selfies everyday...

This isn't my first review by the way, however, this is my first review under this account. I've been doing this since 2008, and joined probably around 2011? But deleted my account and then the site was briefly offline for a bit.

I thought I should mention that since I only have 1 review. Besides that, I have a pretty good memory. I've wanted to see her for quite some time...and I remember her pictures from eros/eccie/etc...And they just haven't been updated as frequently as let's say Ellie, Winter, KKTBG. It's nice they put out pics on Twitter or Instagram on a weekly basis.

I'm not aware of Darling having Insta/Twitter/etc and posting on a regular basis, are you? Here are some that I found:

http://kansascity.sugarnights.com/es...eborah-darling - All 3 of those pictures are out of date.
https://www.eccie.net/providers.php?do=view&id=193993 - All 3 of those pictures were used on her EROS account when she had one, but does not anymore. Those are old.
https://escortindex.com/ad/kc/785-550-8650/1/15806 - THIS ONE, is the best one. This is from Thursday, February 27, 2014 6:26 PM. Please compare/contrast those pictures to the ones on her ECCIE profile and get back to me.

Good luck

I dont have the time and was just asking...but if you say youve done the comparisons...ill believe ya, hows that?

That's good enough...not wanting you to bend the knee or anything, but just want to get the most accurate info out there for everyone, since deception is part of this game.

I would also believe she's in her 40s, not 35. Those pictures were taken in 2014, but possibly earlier. Those sites say she was 32 and if my math is correct, 2019-2014=5, that would make her 37+.

This isn't my first review by the way, however, this is my first review under this account. I've been doing this since 2008...

Here are some that I found... Originally Posted by the-kc-man

It appears you forgot that the research is supposed to happen before the visit...

We all look forward to Trumpeter’s report...

It appears you forgot that the research is supposed to happen before the visit...

We all look forward to Trumpeter’s report... Originally Posted by Wizard of Ahhhhs

LOL

Lots of luck with that thought. Originally Posted by JRLawrence

LOL! True that!