Men of the board, need your help.

I'm getting the reviews on this board and the others caught up to date and it seems like more and more reviews are missing details in the ROS, links to their Showcases, even their names. I really don't have time to chase everyone that wrote a review and get the missing details. I can occasionally help but please don't count on me helping to finish the reviews.

I want to be able to give every review the thumbs-up for PA approval, just need you to pay a little attention to filling it out right.

Thanks yall!

I'm getting the reviews on this board and the others caught up to date and it seems like more and more reviews are missing details in the ROS... Originally Posted by Road Lizard

I dare anyone to find missing details in the RoS of my reviews. If anything, I suspect there are those who'd criticize them for having way too many details...



Cheers,

bcg

If you find any of my reviews lacking in the ROS, just type in, "She took a pounding like a champ." That'll make everyone happy, especially BCG

Reject them if required fields aren't completed. I've seen a number of review boards and sites come and go over the years, and I've seen a few deteriorate to the point that their reviews are unreliable and useless. Don't let that happen here too. Set a standard and stick to it.

HD, I am doing that. This is my only appeal to get guys to watch what they are doing and to try to get them to do a better job.

You wouldn't believe the bitching that happens when I reject a review, asking why couldn't I fill in the blanks for them when they are the ones getting the benefits...bizarre.

You wouldn't believe the bitching that happens when I reject a review, asking why couldn't I fill in the blanks for them when they are the ones getting the benefits...bizarre. Originally Posted by Road Lizard

Absolutely I would believe it; it seems that many (most?) reviewers are Just Plain Lazy... one of my Berzerk Buttons is the reviewer who enters "see website" for contact or rate information.

Cheers,

bcg

When I was moderating for several states here, I would give newbies a break. If a reviewer was relatively new and did not have PA, I'd send him a PM with a link to example reviews and suggest he send me more info. If I got the additional info, I'd add it to the review and, usually, give the guy PA.

If an established member/reviewer sends an incomplete review, I originally researched it and added it in a reply, just as BCG did recently in a review missing all contact information. But when you're moderating six states (Road Lizard has them all now), it gets pretty tedious, so I'd just reject the review. If the guy, on his own, sent me the missing information, I'd add it for him and consider the review for PA.

Moderating takes up quite a bit of time, if you do it right. Experienced mongers need to provide the information needed to make a good review. Newbies get a break, experienced mongers don't.

JaG

If you find any of my reviews lacking in the ROS, just type in, "She took a pounding like a champ." That'll make everyone happy, especially BCG Originally Posted by Abe Normal

Haha. I called it. I saw it coming. Wouldn't have said it myself, but knew someone would.

Too funny.

I don't mind helping the new guy get it right, it's the ones that know how to write one that seems to be the ones getting lazy on the the writing then fussing about when it gets rejected.

If anyone wants to see good reviews, go read BCG's, good stuff! I would say read JaG's but I swear he gets to drooling over his own reviews thinking about the women...

J/K JaG!!!



sorta...

.

Haha. I called it. I saw it coming. Wouldn't have said it myself, but knew someone would.

Too funny. Originally Posted by FLReWrite

Obviously, it's going to be a running gag here for a while.

Hey, no problem. Happy to provide some entertainment to y'all.

Cheers,

bcg

If anyone wants to see good reviews, go read BCG's, good stuff! I would say read JaG's but I swear he gets to drooling over his own reviews thinking about the women... Originally Posted by Road Lizard

If any of y'all are wondering what it's like to maul a mattress with Lea "Admin with Tits" Madisson, you'll do well to read JaG's archived reviews. JaG has 100 posted reviews (his review count reads 101 last I looked, but one of those was a trashed review (redone IIRC) that shows up in his list for some reason), and 18 of them are of Lea (7 one on one sessions with her, and 11 threesomes with Lea and various other providers, some of whom are still here, while some are merely well regarded memories).

Can you tell I'm avoiding useful work today?

While I was binge reading JaG's archived reviews, I probably should have added up how much he's paid for all that sex--EXCUSE ME; I mean for all that time and companionship--but I'd probably find it depressing...

Then again, if he has any children they'd be even more depressed to learn how much of their inheritance JaG has "invested" in loose women.

Cheers,

bcg

If any of y'all are wondering what it's like to maul a mattress with Lea "Admin with Tits" Madisson, you'll do well to read JaG's archived reviews. JaG has 100 posted reviews (his review count reads 101 last I looked, but one of those was a trashed review (redone IIRC) that shows up in his list for some reason), and 18 of them are of Lea (7 one on one sessions with her, and 11 threesomes with Lea and various other providers, some of whom are still here, while some are merely well regarded memories).

Can you tell I'm avoiding useful work today?

While I was binge reading JaG's archived reviews, I probably should have added up how much he's paid for all that sex--EXCUSE ME; I mean for all that time and companionship--but I'd probably find it depressing...

Then again, if he has any children they'd be even more depressed to learn how much of their inheritance JaG has "invested" in loose women.

Cheers,

bcg Originally Posted by bluffcityguy

I don't know. To hear him tell it, most of them were "tight."

I don't know. To hear him tell it, most of them were "tight." Originally Posted by Abe Normal

Good one.

Cheers,

bcg