You are stuck with Romo for 6 long years. Looks like 6 years of .500 seasons.
I will never understand sports contracts. Why do they give away the farm when they could get the same guy for a few ponies.
Although I'm not a Cowboys fan, I have some time to chime in on this subject. #1) the Cowboys had no leverage. They couldn't use their franchise tag on Romo. They were gonna have to pay him what he wanted to risk losing him when his contract was over and get nothing in return. 2) Let him go you say? Who were they going to replace him with? After 3 years they let Stephen McGee go. He's now trying to be the 3rd QB for the Texans. They don't have a franchise QB or someone good enough to replace him. Being a QB in the NFL is tough. Not just anybody can do it successfully. Bottom line, Romo had leverage & the Cowboys didn't. That's why he got paid. Originally Posted by single1These are all good points, and Ranchman made a good point too, but the facts are that Romo is great statistically, and not great under pressure. There are not many guys who can be big time qb's. I would rather take my chances with a young guy than spend big money on an a guy who has proven he is not "the man". Look at Russell Wilson in Seatle. 3rd round choice and unproven last year, but took that club a long way. Settle on an average qb, with an average salary and spend that money on an offensive line.