I ain't going to lie, but I'm kinda excited for a new C.O.D game!
http://youtu.be/SQEbPn36m1c
Battlefield games look good, but once you start playing the multiplayer, they seem broken.Lag?
I love being able to command so many vehicles, and I love how big the maps are, but the lag just kills it for me. Originally Posted by JJ
Lag?I should have explained that I play on an 360 console. I have zero control of where I land.
I've played both - and I don't experience any lag on multiplayer BF3. That is, unless I'm playing on a server located in Europe. I just limit my server selection to east or west US and check the ping. It may also help that I have TWC's highest speed internet option at the casa. Originally Posted by sull36205
You said it perfectly sir! We are starting to get spammed with these fps..and now its spilling over into the rpg world. Assassins creed is, sadly, another casualty of this greedy trend the companies are buying into. At least Borderlands is still ok lol. Quantity over quality doesnt fly when it comes to gaming dammit!!!
sorry to say this but it largely is, its because of this series that I got turned off from FPS. and sadly Ubisoft is doing the same shit with Assassin's Creed. Assassin's Creed is now a redundant series IMHO. Originally Posted by savak
Im not a COD hater, but I think Treyarch make the better installments. The stories are more cohesive, the mp more balanced, and the map design is sooooo much better than IW's. Nuke town, Magma, Firing Range, Cargo, Turbine, Studio, Jungle, Array Originally Posted by marcuslloydI agree 100% my biggest complaint with Infinity Wards games are the poor map design, while Treyarch always delivers well balanced maps. IW wants to do a lot more "wacky" maps with asymmetrical designs, which throw off the balance.