I have been asked repeatedly and I have answered but it appears that answer was not clear enough. I decided to be just a little bit clearer.
I posted in a thread about a provider. I was subsequently attacked which according to the Forum guidelines is against the rules (#1 Avoid cases of unprovoked rudeness to others. No place for it here.) After seeing that this member has done it many other times over and is still an active member, and in good standing, (who has had his behavior and why the mods still allow him to do what he does questioned) I realized the dynamic in play. Said poster is in the porn business giving him the ability to influence others decisions because after all I was given infractions for my replies to the unprovoked assaults I was taking. I felt the need to write that there was no need to "defend someone from lies and false speculation because if you all decide a provider is worthless (especially if a mod is involved). Now to back that up I added "I should have never defended Lacey because I see that once Dahlia and her Johns labeled her no-good and worthless..."
To prove I was right about the mods choosing sides I was given a 10 point infraction when I did not even mention d^*g use. Instead I referred to the false accusations against her and how she was being called such and such in need of a rehab bed (can't write it because defending someone gets you a 10 point infraction). Those accusations went into how she was worthless to some on the board who were attacking her but yet I was given the infraction.
Now because some have made such a big deal out of what I said it doesn't take a genius to figure out a small portion of what is going on in the mens lounge.