Owner of Chloe's Companions of Boston and the new DateCheck has been busted.

Owner of Chloe's Companions out of Boston has been
busted.

She is also the new owner of Date-Check. BE SUPER CAUTIOUS with
DateCheck verification at this time.

hmm how do you know shes the owner of Datecheck ,,something tells me somewhere someone is totally giving false info .the owner doesnt even live in boston or mass its not even a SHE that owns it but a male and I know who the owner is ...

so big deal she also got busted on datecheck too but STOP with the rumors she owns it .date-check is not new they just updated everything ,and they arent going to sell the company to a little bitty titty owner who has working girls .you are way over your head to make up stories like that .OMG .!

Yes, Date-check.net IS new! The older version, that I was a member of for many years, was date-check.com. Besides, from what I can tell, the girl that posted above about the recent bust, is only trying to help other providers be safe; NOT start rumors. We ladies need to stick together! ��

The head honcho of Chloe's companions is female! And yes, she owns the NEW date-check.

link removed as it reveals RW info - NY

link removed as it reveals RW info - NY Originally Posted by Nicolet

I don't think this link should be posted here...it has the lady in question real world name... I could be wrong though

Chloe was definitely the last/latest owner of date-check (.net/.com).

Google search 'Mass.gov Chloe' for another very informative link about her bust :/ or 'Two New Hampshire Women Arrested for Trafficking'.

Thank you Ashley & MsMocha for clarifying & affirming the information I have provided.

Miss CC, I assure you I ALWAYS triple check my information prior to going public with it.

Have a nice day & be safe!

This is not true i just checked with date check this is not true .

I'm not interested in getting into a silly pissing match with anyone here. I stand by my post. Reader are free to decide how they choose to proceed from here.

I personally am not going to accept a denial from a site that stands to lose revenue if they admit to the alegations. It's just that simple.

I will add, if this is in fact a falacy, the credit goes to Chloe herself considering it was in fact her that originally anounced she was the owner of date-check.net at a meet & greet approximately a year ago.

Once again, safe wishes to all.

I'm not interested in getting into a silly pissing match with anyone here. I stand by my post. Reader are free to decide how they choose to proceed from here.

I personally am not going to accept a denial from a site that stands to lose revenue if they admit to the alegations. It's just that simple.

I will add, if this is in fact a falacy, the credit goes to Chloe herself considering it was in fact her that originally anounced she was the owner of date-check.net at a meet & greet approximately a year ago.

Once again, safe wishes to all. Originally Posted by MsChayse

I'm not argueing i'm just stating i emailed them and they got back to me asap , now there are 2 DC which one did she own ,,>. net or . com ? theres a big difference .

They go to the same homepage whether you enter .com or .net

If she is the owner i dont see why they would tell you either way. The authorities already got an order to shut down the agency site .. but with the ip and geo-tracking why would they shut it down anyway when they can collect more info to use in future investigations?

I havent been a member for years so it doesn't matter to me one way or another but ijs it wouldn't be a bad idea for leo to keep it up and use it to get even more info for more busts in the future.
If they have control of the site it only makes sense to keep it up and use it to infiltrate the scene even more

They go to the same homepage whether you enter .com or .net

If she is the owner i dont see why they would tell you either way. The authorities already got an order to shut down the agency site .. but with the ip and geo-tracking why would they shut it down anyway when they can collect more info to use in future investigations?

I havent been a member for years so it doesn't matter to me one way or another but ijs it wouldn't be a bad idea for leo to keep it up and use it to get even more info for more busts in the future.
If they have control of the site it only makes sense to keep it up and use it to infiltrate the scene even more Originally Posted by Kay2Day

No they don't dc.net is down / dc.com is up .

Both .net and .com is coming up for me but its your story tell it how you want it

Whatever Any of you choose to do... just be careful and use common sense.

Trump just signed an executive order to give the courts the ability to throw the book at anyway who is trafficking and to charge them under the organized crime law which is automatic fed time.
You honestly think an owner of a site like that isnt going to play the only card they have to get leniency when they are facing decades in jail and hundred thousands of dollars in fines? If they know and can prove she's the owner you might as well forget it that site is done for. But no worries there are always more to take their place.
Just don't be nieve and think everything is all good...
Cmooooon on now.

And that whole myth that if you ask them that have to tell u if they are affiliated with leo is the biggest misconception in this industry.
I always laughed when i saw the bp adds with the no leo signs sign like they are going to be like " yeahhh we know shes doing illegal shit but she has the no police officer sign" lmao some places the cops can fuck u bust a nut in your face and then bust u forreal lol

Like i said im not a member and haven't been and will definitely not be after this just do your researxh and don't get caught in something stupid

Stay safe ladies