Hey COG, don't you just feel good this morning after hearing that

I tell you what, after I heard that this morning about 8:11am I felt so much better. They have no clue. And remember who predicted Obama would do exactly what he's done with the job numbers and economy crap a month before the election? Remember it was 3 years ago, he said it? ROTFLMAO. I had forgotten, but I did see the show that talked about this. Wow.


Hey Nipples, I have that cream you needed for your poor wittle paws. You are just the cutest little thing I've ever seen.

there is nothing loving about you Kayla....

Not sure what you're talking about, Kayla. Do you have a link or something?

there is nothing loving about you Kayla.... Originally Posted by ekim008

she loves to spew sugar coated hate. Poor girl is one of the fucked in the head Beckies.

COF, its about the unemployment #'s ... everyone from top to bottom that has any responsibility dealing with the actual gatering of the jobs report from employers says there was absoutely no tweaking the report ... nobody from the right believes that ... some idget rightwinger yammers Obama skewed the #'s to benefit the election and all the righties take it as the holy grail .. imagine that. If the #'s went the other way the BLS would be the hero, and Obie would still be the goat. See how it works?

snick

the unemployment rate has been steadily decreasing since 2009. It decreased a little more. Also, it's a holiday season, increased hiring, would make sense to me. Of course, I don't know how they sample, maybe that's not it.

after the venom and obfuscations and ill-considered rants in here you say shes mean? thats rich

i love her

the #'s were from Sept. ... a little early for the holiday hiring bump. Thats next. Of course when the holidays are over and the bump goes the other way, whoever is prez then will get the blame ... unless its Willard.

snort~

Unemployment numbers are smoke and mirrors. They don't count those who have given up looking for work. I think those numbers are pretty high, which is why they don't get reported as often.

Unemployment numbers are smoke and mirrors. They don't count those who have given up looking for work. I think those numbers are pretty high, which is why they don't get reported as often. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

99% of your posts are smoke and mirrors, you should approve of the BLS report.

after the venom and obfuscations and ill-considered rants in here you say shes mean? thats rich

i love her Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

I did not say she was mean, I said she spews hate and coats it with sugar.

A common trait among Tea pukes.

Of course you'd love her!

You two should marry and have baby Marshall's!

If you go into the report you find that they have backtracked and added over 800,000 "temporary" jobs. That is how they claim the percentage is 7.8%. Of course the people with a temporary job with no health insurance and reduced paycheck are not happy. How would you feel if you and two other people were doing one job?

More evidence that WTF just hates women. Are you Taliban WTF?

99% of your posts are smoke and mirrors, you should approve of the BLS report.

Originally Posted by CJ7

I never questioned the report, I question the data the report uses. They don't count all the people who are unemployed or underemployed.

And I'm sorry you don't understand my posts, but that is a problem we have tried to address before, but you refuse my advice.

I did not say she was mean, I said she spews hate and coats it with sugar.


Originally Posted by WTF

i say you are wrong again but ok lets just agree you being wrong again is a given
so i dont have to repeat it

when ever you see me post, or even if i dont post...just know that its given that you are wrong again

sort of like in the sentence "shut up" and the you is understood?

you are WRONG AGAIN is likewise a standing understanding

i'll let ya know when it may not apply

I posted the link for the EXACT protocol the BLS uses to formulate the job #'s ..

every fukn' rightwinger on this board ? .... crickets.

must have been too tough a read for the simpletons ... or something.