Biden lied in last night's debate when he claimed he voted against both the Afghanistan and Iraq War. And he said Ryan's comments were a "bunch of malarkey" and a "bunch of stuff"? LMAO!
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/...rs_654253.html
- NiceGuy53
- 10-12-2012, 12:15 PM
- I B Hankering
- 10-12-2012, 02:22 PM
The Iraq Resolution or the Iraq War Resolution (formally the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002,[1] Pub.L. 107-243, 116 Stat. 1498, enacted October 16, 2002, H.J.Res. 114) is a joint resolution passed by the United States Congress in October 2002 as Public Law No: 107-243, authorizing military action against Iraq.
United States Senate
Party . . . . . . .Ayes . .Nays . .No Vote
Republican . . . .48 . . . . .1 . . . . .0
Democratic. . . .29 . . . .21. . . . . .0
Independent . . .0 . . . . . 1 . . . . .0
TOTALS . . . . . 77 . . . . 23 . . . . .0
21 (42%) of 50 Democratic senators voted against the resolution: Sens. Akaka (D-HI), Bingaman (D-NM), Boxer (D-CA), Byrd (D-WV), Conrad (D-ND), Corzine (D-NJ), Dayton (D-MN), Durbin (D-IL), Feingold (D-WI), Graham (D-FL), Inouye (D-HI), Kennedy (D-MA), Leahy (D-VT), Levin (D-MI), Mikulski (D-MD), Murray (D-WA), Reed (D-RI), Sarbanes (D-MD), Stabenow (D-MI), Wellstone (D-MN), and Wyden (D-OR).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution
H.J.RES.114
Latest Title: Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002
Sponsor: Rep Hastert, J. Dennis [IL-14] (introduced 10/2/2002) Cosponsors (136)
Related Bills: H.RES.574, H.J.RES.110, S.J.RES.45, S.J.RES.46
SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.
(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The President is authorized to use the
Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary
and appropriate in order to—
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-1...jres114enr.pdf
Biden (D-DE), Yea
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LI...n=2&vote=00237
Biden voted for the resolution and lied last night when he claimed he voted against the resolution.
United States Senate
Party . . . . . . .Ayes . .Nays . .No Vote
Republican . . . .48 . . . . .1 . . . . .0
Democratic. . . .29 . . . .21. . . . . .0
Independent . . .0 . . . . . 1 . . . . .0
TOTALS . . . . . 77 . . . . 23 . . . . .0
21 (42%) of 50 Democratic senators voted against the resolution: Sens. Akaka (D-HI), Bingaman (D-NM), Boxer (D-CA), Byrd (D-WV), Conrad (D-ND), Corzine (D-NJ), Dayton (D-MN), Durbin (D-IL), Feingold (D-WI), Graham (D-FL), Inouye (D-HI), Kennedy (D-MA), Leahy (D-VT), Levin (D-MI), Mikulski (D-MD), Murray (D-WA), Reed (D-RI), Sarbanes (D-MD), Stabenow (D-MI), Wellstone (D-MN), and Wyden (D-OR).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution
H.J.RES.114
Latest Title: Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002
Sponsor: Rep Hastert, J. Dennis [IL-14] (introduced 10/2/2002) Cosponsors (136)
Related Bills: H.RES.574, H.J.RES.110, S.J.RES.45, S.J.RES.46
SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.
(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The President is authorized to use the
Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary
and appropriate in order to—
(1) defend the national security of the United States against
the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and
(2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council.
resolutions regarding Iraq
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-1...jres114enr.pdf
Biden (D-DE), Yea
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LI...n=2&vote=00237
Biden voted for the resolution and lied last night when he claimed he voted against the resolution.
- acp5762
- 10-12-2012, 02:40 PM
Dude they all lie. After the debates they all dummy up for a drink and laugh their fucking asses off about how gullible people are.
- I B Hankering
- 10-12-2012, 02:51 PM
- Yssup Rider
- 10-12-2012, 02:59 PM
To begin with that article takes the entire exchange out of context. Second, even the headline on this INCREDIBLY nonbiased website says "Insinuates," which isn't quite the same as "says" or "states" or "declares." It's another fucking wingnut spinjob. Plain and simple.
But once again, you've found a way to turn barbecue into bullshit. I watched that and don't recall him saying he voted against the resolutions to prosecute the wars. I think he MIGHT have been referring to another resolution... possibly ... but of course, you hear what someone tells you you hear and then run out and research the misconception until you've uncovered Jimmy Hoffa. How typically sophomoric.
This game here doesn't go to the least discredited liar. You've been working real hard, and are by far the MOST discredited liar on ECCIE. That's why you can't progress beyond
DIPSHIT OF THE YEAR!
But once again, you've found a way to turn barbecue into bullshit. I watched that and don't recall him saying he voted against the resolutions to prosecute the wars. I think he MIGHT have been referring to another resolution... possibly ... but of course, you hear what someone tells you you hear and then run out and research the misconception until you've uncovered Jimmy Hoffa. How typically sophomoric.
This game here doesn't go to the least discredited liar. You've been working real hard, and are by far the MOST discredited liar on ECCIE. That's why you can't progress beyond
DIPSHIT OF THE YEAR!
- acp5762
- 10-12-2012, 04:13 PM
- I B Hankering
- 10-12-2012, 04:26 PM
To begin with that article takes the entire exchange out of context. Second, even the headline on this INCREDIBLY nonbiased website says "Insinuates," which isn't quite the same as "says" or "states" or "declares." It's another fucking wingnut spinjob. Plain and simple.The Iraq Resolution or the Iraq War Resolution (formally the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002,[1] Pub.L. 107-243, 116 Stat. 1498, enacted October 16, 2002, H.J.Res. 114) is a joint resolution passed by the United States Congress in October 2002 as Public Law No: 107-243, authorizing military action against Iraq.
But once again, you've found a way to turn barbecue into bullshit. I watched that and don't recall him saying he voted against the resolutions to prosecute the wars. I think he MIGHT have been referring to another resolution... possibly ... but of course, you hear what someone tells you you hear and then run out and research the misconception until you've uncovered Jimmy Hoffa. How typically sophomoric.
This game here doesn't go to the least discredited liar. You've been working real hard, and are by far the MOST discredited liar on ECCIE. That's why you can't progress beyond
DIPSHIT OF THE YEAR! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
United States Senate
Party . . . . . . .Ayes . .Nays . .No Vote
Republican . . . .48 . . . . .1 . . . . .0
Democratic. . . .29 . . . .21. . . . . .0
Independent . . .0 . . . . . 1 . . . . .0
TOTALS . . . . . 77 . . . . 23 . . . . .0
21 (42%) of 50 Democratic senators voted against the resolution: Sens. Akaka (D-HI), Bingaman (D-NM), Boxer (D-CA), Byrd (D-WV), Conrad (D-ND), Corzine (D-NJ), Dayton (D-MN), Durbin (D-IL), Feingold (D-WI), Graham (D-FL), Inouye (D-HI), Kennedy (D-MA), Leahy (D-VT), Levin (D-MI), Mikulski (D-MD), Murray (D-WA), Reed (D-RI), Sarbanes (D-MD), Stabenow (D-MI), Wellstone (D-MN), and Wyden (D-OR).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution
H.J.RES.114
Latest Title: Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002
Sponsor: Rep Hastert, J. Dennis [IL-14] (introduced 10/2/2002) Cosponsors (136)
Related Bills: H.RES.574, H.J.RES.110, S.J.RES.45, S.J.RES.46
SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.
(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The President is authorized to use the
Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary
and appropriate in order to—
(1) defend the national security of the United States against
the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and
(2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council.
resolutions regarding Iraq
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-1...jres114enr.pdf
Biden (D-DE), Yea
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LI...n=2&vote=00237
- NiceGuy53
- 10-12-2012, 10:06 PM
To begin with that article takes the entire exchange out of context. Second, even the headline on this INCREDIBLY nonbiased website says "Insinuates," which isn't quite the same as "says" or "states" or "declares." It's another fucking wingnut spinjob. Plain and simple.
But once again, you've found a way to turn barbecue into bullshit. I watched that and don't recall him saying he voted against the resolutions to prosecute the wars. I think he MIGHT have been referring to another resolution... possibly ... but of course, you hear what someone tells you you hear and then run out and research the misconception until you've uncovered Jimmy Hoffa. How typically sophomoric.
This game here doesn't go to the least discredited liar. You've been working real hard, and are by far the MOST discredited liar on ECCIE. That's why you can't progress beyond
DIPSHIT OF THE YEAR!
So you think he MIGHT have been referring to another resolution...possibly? LMAO! Even for you, that is an incredibly stupid thing to say.
This is what Biden said. "By the way, they talk about this great recession, like it fell out of the sky, like, Oh my goodness, where did it come from? It came from this man voting to put two wars on a credit card, at the same time, put a prescription drug plan on the credit card, a trillion dollar taxcut for the very wealthy. I was there. I voted against them. I said, no we can't afford that." http://campaigntrailreport.com/2012/...ebate-he-didnt
Biden voted for both the Afghanistan and Iraq War resolutions. So he lied, when he said he voted against them. Like another famous politician recently remarked, "It takes some brass to attack a guy for doing what you did".