Encounter: K-Fest was the Cat's Meow

Date: 5/14
Name: Cat
Phone: Will provide after screening
Email Address: -
URL / Website: www.k-festival.net
City: Dallas
State: TX
Address: will provide after screening
Activities: LFK, DFK, DATY, MPCFS, Mutual Massage
Hair Length and Color: Dk Brown mid-back
Age: 30s
Smoking Status: Couldn't tell
Ethnic Background: Asian
Physical Description: Slender, cute, maybe 5'-5", nice natural B's, round grab-able ass, playful sweet personality
Recommendation: Yes!

Cat has skills. People take too much stock into the pictures. Close enough for me and she did not disappoint.

Cat has skills. People take too much stock into the pictures. Close enough for me and she did not disappoint. Originally Posted by Kittchat12

You know, bringing up the pictures reminded me of them again. The continual defense of K-Fest pictures is tedious.

Interesting, Not

promoter city.... what a pity

promoter city.... what a pity Originally Posted by Hewhew

I wonder if there is a post on this board without someone saying Promoter.

I just left Cat’s Apt. She has mad skills.

I wonder if there is a post on this board without someone saying Promoter.

I just left Cat’s Apt. She has mad skills. Originally Posted by Kittchat12

It's really quite simple - it's been 8 days since the last post in this thread and 3+ weeks since the original review......you bumping this thread and making a post that provides zero value to anyone proves my point exactly.

Unfortunately, your only defense is to act befuddled and ask why the big bad mean posters are saying they're fed up with promoting......but it's really a pity you don't realize that other mongers notice what you're doing as well.

So ONCE AGAIN, I will explain very clearly that most guys don't have an issue with promoters that provide value in some way (e.g. telling us who is working at which places, hours of operations, pricing changes, the times each girl works, fielding mongers' questions about appearance / services as long as it's answered truthfully, etc.). Yes, I know promoting has been going on since I signed up for ASPD and yes, I know that it's my responsibility to do my homework before seeing a girl (caveat emptor). What most guys have an issue with are the following -

1. Constant bumping of dormant threads.....so much so that recent and informative reviews get bumped to Page 2 or 3 and people waste time reading dormant threads with absolutely zero value provided in any of the thread bumpers' posts

2. Downplaying/trivializing negative comments - If a guy writes a review and gives a "NO" recommendation or has something negative to say about a girl, any negative comments are trivialized. Some example replies by promoters that I have seen after negative comments (I am paraphrasing here) - "you finished though, right?", "Dallas mongers are too picky", "I've heard her service has really improved since she first started", "just be thankful we have a Latina at an AMP to play with." While these comments may be true, why not just accept them?

3. Reviews that embellish the lady's services and/or physical appearance. If promoters want to get a freebie and write a review, I'm fine with that.....but don't say that a girl is in her 30's and slim when she is actually in her 40's and has a gut.

And when I talk about the above issues, I am talking about guys CONSISTENTLY doing this. I have mentioned before that I have probably been guilty of number 2 a few times, but that doesn't mean that I do it every time a negative comment is made about a girl I like. So again, the key word is CONSISTENTLY.

Also, if you would like for me to provide examples of each of the above items, please let me know. I don't have a list handy, but I think it would be easy to pull some examples together.

If it is that important to you to write a book. Carry on. I will write my Cat review tomorrow.

If it is that important to you to write a book. Carry on. I will write my Cat review tomorrow. Originally Posted by Kittchat12

And if it is that important for you to bump a thread that hasn't been posted to in 8 days to cry wolf about people calling out promoters (oh yeah, and to tell us you just left Cat's apartment). How about you just write a review about her in the first place instead of bumping an extremely dormant thread?

But on another note, I'm looking forward to your review of Cat.....I have no doubt she'll receive a glowing review. I thought Cat was at Lovely Angels at one point, but for some reason I mixed her and Julie up.

Why is it that in the past month and a half, Kfest has been bringing more girls to Dallas, but virtually all of the press here has been negative for them? I'm honestly very curious. Compared to star and Angels, Kfest has brought on more new girls by at least double. But it's still not good enough.

People here are waiting for bad reviews and calling them honest but any glowing review must be a promotion. The anti KF bigotry is palpable here.


But I kinda get it, people sometimes do embellish the appearance of the girls. Big fucking deal. Literally everyone here has done this. However by that same token, nobody called out the reviews of soda from Angels for leaving out the most notable notable thing about her appearance, her fat fucking gut. Nobody called out Red for not looking like her photos by at least a decade. Or Maple for that matter. Last month there were glowing reviews for soda, someone who is straight up obese compared to the other girls, but I don't recall anyone calling those out. If you're going to call out reviews for being overly sensational, don't you think you should be philosophically consistent and apply that rule to everyone?

So why Kfest? Do you guys just like rooting for the people who are behind? What sin has Kfest committed that there are literal threads calling for boycotts?

I've said it before and I'll say it again, Dallas is a joke compared to LA.


Whining aside, Cat is one of the best I'm the scene. This isn't even something that can be argued against.

Why is it that in the past month and a half, Kfest has been bringing more girls to Dallas, but virtually all of the press here has been negative for them? I'm honestly very curious. Compared to star and Angels, Kfest has brought on more new girls by at least double. But it's still not good enough.

People here are waiting for bad reviews and calling them honest but any glowing review must be a promotion. The anti KF bigotry is palpable here.


But I kinda get it, people sometimes do embellish the appearance of the girls. Big fucking deal. Literally everyone here has done this. However by that same token, nobody called out the reviews of soda from Angels for leaving out the most notable notable thing about her appearance, her fat fucking gut. Nobody called out Red for not looking like her photos by at least a decade. Or Maple for that matter. Last month there were glowing reviews for soda, someone who is straight up obese compared to the other girls, but I don't recall anyone calling those out. If you're going to call out reviews for being overly sensational, don't you think you should be philosophically consistent and apply that rule to everyone?

So why Kfest? Do you guys just like rooting for the people who are behind? What sin has Kfest committed that there are literal threads calling for boycotts?

I've said it before and I'll say it again, Dallas is a joke compared to LA.


Whining aside, Cat is one of the best I'm the scene. This isn't even something that can be argued against. Originally Posted by Kumite

I don't call out girls.....I call out the promoters. As to why I haven't called out the girls at Lovely Angels, I'm sorry but I don't see promoters CONSISTENTLY bumping dormant LA threads, trivializing negative comments, and writing little cute gimmicky comments about the LA girls. If guys have CONSISTENTLY done any of the things I just mentioned, please provides links. The key word is "consistently." As far as the LA girls you mentioned and their embellished appearance - again, if I see guys CONSISTENTLY writing reviews about ONLY LA girls and embellishing their appearance, I have no issue calling that out.

And I'm not sure why you think "virtually all the press for K-Fest has been negative"...? I haven't said anything negative about any specific K-Fest girls. I have never been there, so why would I? My posts regarding K-Fest are aimed at the promoters. I feel like I have been pretty consistent with that. And I have never once said that K-Fest should be boycotted.

And just an FYI, when literally 27 of your 28 posts are about K-Fest (dating back to February), it's pretty evident what you're about. It took me exactly 60 seconds to scroll through and find that out, so it's not like it's some very intricate investigative work done on my part. When people make posts like you do, looking at their reviews and posting history is so easy to do and it tells me everything I need to know.

And another FYI - the first and last sentences of your post also tell me everything I need to know about what you're doing here. Very laughable that you decide to throw stuff like that in your post. And just to just to sum up your post -

Section 1 - Promote K-Fest for bringing the most girls to Dallas
Section 2 - Cry wolf about K-Fest's negative press
Section 3 - Sling personal attacks against every notable Lovely Angels girl
Section 4 - Promote K-Fest one more time before you leave

I don't call out girls.....I call out the promoters. As to why I haven't called out the girls at Lovely Angels, I'm sorry but I don't see promoters CONSISTENTLY bumping dormant LA threads, trivializing negative comments, and writing little cute gimmicky comments about the LA girls. If guys have CONSISTENTLY done any of the things I just mentioned, please provides links. The key word is "consistently." As far as the LA girls you mentioned and their embellished appearance - again, if I see guys CONSISTENTLY writing reviews about ONLY LA girls and embellishing their appearance, I have no issue calling that out.

And I'm not sure why you think "virtually all the press for K-Fest has been negative"...? I haven't said anything negative about any specific K-Fest girls. I have never been there, so why would I? My posts regarding K-Fest are aimed at the promoters. I feel like I have been pretty consistent with that. And I have never once said that K-Fest should be boycotted.

And just an FYI, when literally 27 of your 28 posts are about K-Fest (dating back to February), it's pretty evident what you're about. It took me exactly 60 seconds to scroll through and find that out, so it's not like it's some very intricate investigative work done on my part. When people make posts like you do, looking at their reviews and posting history is so easy to do and it tells me everything I need to know.

And another FYI - the first and last sentences of your post also tell me everything I need to know about what you're doing here. Very laughable that you decide to throw stuff like that in your post. And just to just to sum up your post -

Section 1 - Promote K-Fest for bringing the most girls to Dallas
Section 2 - Cry wolf about K-Fest's negative press
Section 3 - Sling personal attacks against every notable Lovely Angels girl
Section 4 - Promote K-Fest one more time before you leave Originally Posted by Jayhawk328

Just out of curiosity, How has any of his post or anyone’s affected your decision to see or not to see a girl? You are the one crying Wolf like all the other losers on this board because he posts about KFest and posts reviews?

I read this board for a while before I decided to join in and I personally like La, KFest and luxury. I am labeled a promoter yet could really care less because we have the Drama created by a few people calling out everything and everyone. Information is information, I can tell you that I get an hour with these girls that are promoted in your eyes and it lives up to the expectation. I have gone out on the limb a time or two with unreviewed or promoted girls and have a great time.

Seems people expectations are real on this fantasy board. You guys hit so hard at promoters and tell fake reviews or they are being paid or this guy did not get the experience from his hard earned money and that it’s the promoters fault.

Please. I spent 20 minutes talking to Jasmine at Luxury. She is YMMV when it comes to BBBJ. She told me if the guys smells bad after she has scrubbed his nasty ass. No way is she sticking his pole in her mouth uncovered.

She didn’t care what the review said or really anyone. I found that interesting because I can not have that conversation with a 20-30 yr old K Girl because the communication is very limited. Thai Soya the same way, limited English but not CIM if you smell bad.

Shit happens and then the butthurt smelly poster comes on here as the victim and cry’s it’s the promoters fault.

My dick was too big for her, my dick was just right for her ass, she could not deep throat me and immediately so one says her service sucks and the place is a rip off. Think about that the next time you pay to be blown and she throws your money back at you because you do not put her at ease in one form or another.

You get more sugar being sweet than sour!

Ps. Who care that I bumped a thread 8 days old. Isn’t the rule a month, you ain’t the boss.

Just out of curiosity, How has any of his post or anyone’s affected your decision to see or not to see a girl? You are the one crying Wolf like all the other losers on this board because he posts about KFest and posts reviews?

I read this board for a while before I decided to join in and I personally like La, KFest and luxury. I am labeled a promoter yet could really care less because we have the Drama created by a few people calling out everything and everyone. Information is information, I can tell you that I get an hour with these girls that are promoted in your eyes and it lives up to the expectation. I have gone out on the limb a time or two with unreviewed or promoted girls and have a great time.

Seems people expectations are real on this fantasy board. You guys hit so hard at promoters and tell fake reviews or they are being paid or this guy did not get the experience from his hard earned money and that it’s the promoters fault.

Please. I spent 20 minutes talking to Jasmine at Luxury. She is YMMV when it comes to BBBJ. She told me if the guys smells bad after she has scrubbed his nasty ass. No way is she sticking his pole in her mouth uncovered.

She didn’t care what the review said or really anyone. I found that interesting because I can not have that conversation with a 20-30 yr old K Girl because the communication is very limited. Thai Soya the same way, limited English but not CIM if you smell bad.

Shit happens and then the butthurt smelly poster comes on here as the victim and cry’s it’s the promoters fault.

My dick was too big for her, my dick was just right for her ass, she could not deep throat me and immediately so one says her service sucks and the place is a rip off. Think about that the next time you pay to be blown and she throws your money back at you because you do not put her at ease in one form or another.

You get more sugar being sweet than sour! Originally Posted by Kittchat12

Way way way too much conjecture in your post buddy. When a girl gets a negative review or something negative is said about her and you automatically assume it's the guy's fault for smelling bad, the guy's dick is too big, etc.? Please refer to Number 2 of my list of issues we have with promoters. The kinds of stuff you're mentioning in your post is exactly what I'm talking about.

But why do you give the benefit of the doubt to the girl? If a girl gets negative comments, why not just accept them? Is it always fair? Nope. Are some guys extra critical and are too hard to please? Yes. But that is part of every business. When you go to a restaurant and you receive bad service from the waitress/waiter or the food was bad, do you think the manager would immediately come up to you and say,
"Sorry but your order was too picky"
"Sorry, you're a picky eater"

"Your expectations are too high"
"I don't know what you're talking about but our steaks are great. The other steakhouse you go to sucks and their quality of meat is bad"

NOPE, that's not what happens. Guys spend their hard earned money at these places, drive from far away, or are only able to hobby once every few months, so if they have a bad experience, why do the girls always get the benefit of the doubt in your eyes? Yes, some guys are extra mean and sling personal and unnecessary insults at girls (refer to Post #10 made by you when you said Soda has a "fat fucking gut" and is "straight up obese".......very great way to make your point). But saying guys are too picky, their dicks are too big, or they smell bad is conjecture and is NOT an effective way to deal with negative comments.

The fact that we have to keep explaining why we have issues with promoters is mind boggling. Instead of crying wolf all the time (which is always the same people crying wolf), quit being stubborn and adapt. Promoting has always been pervasive (mainly in the AMP section), but it's gotten out of control the past few years and the main 3 issues I listed in Post #7 above have become more frequent and more pervasive than every before.

Maybe so. But the bottom line is I read as many reviews as I can before seeei g some one and do not base it off 1 review. If you think the promoters have that much power then you probably think the moon landing was fake as hell too.