- stew4
- 04-11-2012, 03:21 PM
if you could I don't know if you can bit look at a review on lauren fresh meat by shanbar akbar he posted this to cause problems for this girl and she would like it removed they posted het number but tonk removed that she is still getting several calls daily she is scared and fears someone might hurt her please if you could help remove all comments in this review thankyou!
- Spacemtn
- 04-11-2012, 05:32 PM
stew4,
Per the following posting guideline, we do not remove reviews unless we can prove that the review is a complete falsehood and that a session never took place:
#22 - ECCIE Staff will go to great lengths to avoid editing, deleting, or censoring our members posts or threads...unless absolutely necessary. Forbidden topics such as underage sex, illicit drugs, bestiality, revealing personal info, medical speculation, or images not in compliance will be removed from public view. Controversial, troublesome, or objectionable posts may draw staff attention or in some cases disciplinary action, but the offending post will not be removed from the view of our membership in any but the most extreme cases. Often times you will find directions, footnotes, or other guidance from staff edited INTO posts which draw our attention. These are for the purpose of educating the readers of what is and what is not acceptable as well as informing others about how these issues have been dealt with. Members are encouraged to RTM posts which include rule infractions or objectionable material if it appears that staff has not already becomed involved with the thread or post in particular.
Note: Staff will consider a request from the original poster to remove a thread/post they have made provided it was recently posted and not replied to. As a general rule, staff will not consider such requests once a thread or post has been visible for at least 4 hours or received 2 or more replies. In these cases, a request from the OP to lock the thread is more appropriate and will receive consideration.
And this one specifically deals with reviews:
#24 - Disputed reviews will not be removed by staff unless the request is made by the thread starter. In situations such as this, the proper protocol for addressing a review in question is to post a rebuttal to the review in that city forum's coed discussions area. Staff will be happy to do some basic investigation to confirm the validity of such reviews, however removal will only take place when requested by the thread-starter or in extreme cases where it has been proven false, there is an admission by the reviewer that the review is indeed false, or the reviewer failed to cooperate with staff's efforts to confirm validity. In cases where a reviewer is found to have posted a review of a session which did not take place, or posted blatantly false information within a review, the reviewer will be subject to disciplinary action at the discretion of staff, which could lead to loss of posting privileges. Along those same lines, if the reviewed party is found to be making false or inaccurate claims to staff in an attempt to trigger staff action against a reviewer or the removal of a review, that party will also be subject to consequences, up to or including temporary or permanent loss of account access. These measures exist to preserve the integrity of the information posted in our review forums, and will be taken when these circumstances exist.
Spacemtn
AustinModStaff
Per the following posting guideline, we do not remove reviews unless we can prove that the review is a complete falsehood and that a session never took place:
#22 - ECCIE Staff will go to great lengths to avoid editing, deleting, or censoring our members posts or threads...unless absolutely necessary. Forbidden topics such as underage sex, illicit drugs, bestiality, revealing personal info, medical speculation, or images not in compliance will be removed from public view. Controversial, troublesome, or objectionable posts may draw staff attention or in some cases disciplinary action, but the offending post will not be removed from the view of our membership in any but the most extreme cases. Often times you will find directions, footnotes, or other guidance from staff edited INTO posts which draw our attention. These are for the purpose of educating the readers of what is and what is not acceptable as well as informing others about how these issues have been dealt with. Members are encouraged to RTM posts which include rule infractions or objectionable material if it appears that staff has not already becomed involved with the thread or post in particular.
Note: Staff will consider a request from the original poster to remove a thread/post they have made provided it was recently posted and not replied to. As a general rule, staff will not consider such requests once a thread or post has been visible for at least 4 hours or received 2 or more replies. In these cases, a request from the OP to lock the thread is more appropriate and will receive consideration.
And this one specifically deals with reviews:
#24 - Disputed reviews will not be removed by staff unless the request is made by the thread starter. In situations such as this, the proper protocol for addressing a review in question is to post a rebuttal to the review in that city forum's coed discussions area. Staff will be happy to do some basic investigation to confirm the validity of such reviews, however removal will only take place when requested by the thread-starter or in extreme cases where it has been proven false, there is an admission by the reviewer that the review is indeed false, or the reviewer failed to cooperate with staff's efforts to confirm validity. In cases where a reviewer is found to have posted a review of a session which did not take place, or posted blatantly false information within a review, the reviewer will be subject to disciplinary action at the discretion of staff, which could lead to loss of posting privileges. Along those same lines, if the reviewed party is found to be making false or inaccurate claims to staff in an attempt to trigger staff action against a reviewer or the removal of a review, that party will also be subject to consequences, up to or including temporary or permanent loss of account access. These measures exist to preserve the integrity of the information posted in our review forums, and will be taken when these circumstances exist.
Spacemtn
AustinModStaff
- stew4
- 04-11-2012, 06:21 PM
the review posted is a blatant lie and was made to defame and indanger the said person the reviewer posted personal information via telephone number and proximity of said persons house I am formally requesting that all information and post be removed. thank you in your cooperation. in this matter.
- ztonk
- 04-11-2012, 08:22 PM
Because her phone number is no longer posted, and the "Lamar / Rundberg area" location is sufficiently vague, and since you are a guy and I'm assuming were not there, the review stands.
If the lady wants to contact us privately herself (austin@eccie.net) and contest the review, she can, but at this point, I'm not seeing what benefit that would do her but to prolong the drama.
ztonk
AustinModStaff
If the lady wants to contact us privately herself (austin@eccie.net) and contest the review, she can, but at this point, I'm not seeing what benefit that would do her but to prolong the drama.
ztonk
AustinModStaff
- pantsontheground
- 04-12-2012, 07:29 AM
Ha ha! In your face, stew4!
- nuglet
- 04-12-2012, 10:46 AM
sounds like a jealous boyfriend.. I'm sure she could speak for herself if she wanted..
- ztonk
- 04-12-2012, 11:33 AM
Since the OP is gone and there is nothing left to discuss, I'm closing this.