When No Show Reviews are moved to CoEd it seems

When No Show Reviews are moved to CoEd it seems

When No Show Reviews are moved to CoEd it seems that there is no regard for ROS details being openly discussed.

Shouldn't staff show the same diligence in regards to these threads as any other thread where private information, not meant to be read or discussed publicly?

Perhaps a better practice would be to lock the review in place and PM direction to the OP to start a thread in the proper place.

We certainly want to get the information out but read ANY NCNS review thread moved to CoEd and you find open discussion of information never meant, by design, for the public eye....

Admittedly in MOST the information in the ROS is not of a nature that it shouldn't be discussed but that should NOT be left for the discretion of the membership.

Personally, I think the practice of moving NCNS reviews to Coed simply offers a level of protection and gives benefit of the doubt to the provider and detracts from the reporting system.

I asked the question of about 10 guys how they search for info on a girl and they search the review section. If a gal has reviews pop up there and they never search other forums they never see the negativity that MAY/PROBABLY would color their decision to see the girl.

Since it was a NCNS of some sort or in the event that no activities took place, there is really no Rest of the Story to protect.

The ROS is restricted so Private Access members can see intimate details of the Hobbiest's session as he recounts them. Since nothing happend in the "Reviews" that are moved to Coed, then there are no details and nothing to protect.

As many times as this has been discussed here and other places, one would think that we all understand that a Review is written ONLY when a session (good or bad) actually takes place. All other threads should (like NCNS, or bad info so hobbiest left before session started, etc) should be in Coed.

Spacemtn
AustinModStaff

I understand... and you understand but shouldn't the person writing the review have the same right to privacy that the remarks in ROS guarantees?

We correct the behavior of reviewers in the forum on all the other things they do wrong.

There is no warning or information in the rules that would indicate that if you mistakenly use the review form to report something that it will get moved to another area.

What purpose does MOVING the review serve?

Sure it facilitates discussion but it eliminates the intent of the reviewer which is a warning.

Why not move it to the Alerts Section?

I don't have figures but I would bet if it as measured that the vast majority of searches for information about a provider occurs in the reviews section, alerts section and locker room...... and that Coed would rank very low....

As often as we have heard the discussion, haven't we also heard of how the whole buildup to the session, the flirty emails, the texts exchanged, telephone calls etc build the anticipation and are reviewed as if part of the session?


Seems to be for those guys that have that romantic approach to it all that they probably are looking for bell#2 when the lady opens the door.... so couldn't they rightfully believe that the whole GFE experience had already started?

Perhaps another thing that many don't realize is that if it starts in the Review Forum, then it comes up in the Mods Review page for "Moderation" and then assignment. Moving it to Coed does not change that fact, so if you are thinking that by moving the Review that was not really a Review to Coed that it is not searchable, think again.

It also doesn't belong in Alerts is defines as follows:
Alerts - Austin Issues which could endanger the safety of a member or members of our community go here. Please reserve this space for legitimate alerts, and not general FYI material.
Issues which could endanger the safety of a member or members of our community go here. Please reserve this space for legitimate alerts, and not general FYI material


NCNS doesn't necessarily create a situation where a member is "endangered".

Ultimately, Staff has decided that this is how we handle "Reviews" that are not Reviews because a session never took place. There have been many calls in the National Forums for a NCNS Forum. Maybe we will see such a Forum in the future.

Spacemtn
AustinModStaff

Alerts - Austin Issues which could endanger the safety of a member or members of our community go here. Please reserve this space for legitimate alerts, and not general FYI material.

Issues which could endanger the safety of a member or members of our community go here. Please reserve this space for legitimate alerts, and not general FYI material


NCNS doesn't necessarily create a situation where a member is "endangered". Originally Posted by Spacemtn

Neither do situations where a provider is not paid for services rendered or some guy redirects them as a prank to the wrong door

We have an alert viewed 4300 times with 48 comments about a guy that left his watch behind and called the lady after the fact.

Is your time worth money to you? When you wast an hour of it driving somewhere getting stood up and returning do you feel "ripped off"?

We use alerts for a lot of things....


Maybe we need a Forum called "I'm really pissed off about this person and I can't post it anywhere else but they let me post it here forum!"

Hell... You could move a lot of threads about ME there!

Perhaps another thing that many don't realize is that if it starts in the Review Forum, then it comes up in the Mods Review page for "Moderation" and then assignment. Moving it to Coed does not change that fact, so if you are thinking that by moving the Review that was not really a Review to Coed that it is not searchable, think again. Originally Posted by Spacemtn

A search of "Amber Rain" (with or without capital letters) in Austin yields the following

http://www.eccie.net/search.php?searchid=15974689

As you can see the NCNS report is mysteriously missing and her reputation remains unmarred.

It did not matter what forum I searched. It is not coming up as a result.

Right Spacemtn?

Spacemtn already explained why NCNS's go in co-ed

Review forums are only for reviews and a NCNS is not a review and it must be moved to co-ed

we don't make the rules we just follow them although as I have seen there will always be members who dispute the rules