A Nevada woman loses her insurance due to the Obamacare mandate and then she loses her life because she can't get treatment for something that she paid for.
http://www.reviewjournal.com/news/la...nst-xerox-dies
A Nevada woman loses her insurance due to the Obamacare mandate and then she loses her life because she can't get treatment for something that she paid for.Good thing her family won't win shit because of the GOP led Tort reform!
http://www.reviewjournal.com/news/la...nst-xerox-dies Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
Since I have WTF on "ignore" I don't know what he said. I do find it amazing that he could respond so fast and READ the article in question. Talk about the lame trying to lead the lame. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
A Nevada woman loses her insurance due to the Obamacare mandate and then she loses her life because she can't get treatment for something that she paid for.JD, you are just playing politics. Some human being made a clerical error with her health insurance application. That is why she didn't have coverage, not because of the ACA law. From your link.
http://www.reviewjournal.com/news/la...nst-xerox-dies Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
Which would not have happened except for the requirements of Obamacare. Remember when Bill Clinton killed a man in the same way? Bill was playing golf and he delayed his departure (typical Clinton) but down the road traffic was being held up for the motorcade. It continued to be held because they were waiting for Bill to drive by. One of those vehicles was an ambulance carring a man who had had a heart attack. He died waiting in traffic. Did Clinton murder this man? NO. Did Clinton know that he was partially responsible? NO. Did Clinton's actions (his delay) contribute to this man's death? YES!If it were Bush 1, Reagan or Bush 2 playing golf instead of Clinton, would you be using this as an argument?
This woman died of a disease because of circumstances contributed to by the Obamacare law. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn