It was by Mueller's direction that the Grand Jury was impaneled in D.C. and not in Alexandria, Virginia, where the original Grand Jury was impaneled. Every decision Mueller has made from selecting his team of hostile, pro-hildebeest, agenda driven agents to impaneling a Grand Jury in a town known to have overwhelmingly voted against Trump has the earmarks of being rigged towards a predetermined outcome.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Mueller didn't select the Grand Jurors, but I'm not saying his "venue" was friendly to Trump either, and Virginia probably wouldn't be much better, although perhaps somewhat. The Grand Jurors were selected by the Judge and from a panel just like a petite jury panel .. except there's do defendant's counsel to make objections. "Jury selection" is a misnomer ... jurors are disqualified or rejected and the sitting jurors are taken in numeric order (from 1 to ....) of the group left. That's the way it should be done. If that process is not followed, then anyone indicted from that sitting Grand Jury can make an objection and seek a dismissal of the indictment(s). That was my point.
https://beta.code.dccouncil.us/dc/co...s/11-1906.html
If you browse further you will see the similarity between grand and petite jury selection and process. The purpose is just different ....
... and your use of the word "direction" is misguided .. it's more of a "request" of the Presiding Federal Judge of the District.
As a practical matter a jury panel in D.C. would look about like a California jury panel as far as Trump et al are concerned, but with a heavier dose of tree huggers (what trees are left) and comfort pet owners ... and now more legally impaired persons.