Ok, WTF. Here it is.That is not misogynist.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/...on_633200.html Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
Here's another one, WTF, for your "believing brain".Sara is a public figure, Fluke just wanted to be. She was not a public figure.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/zekejmiller/...ffensive-why-a
Nobody called Sarah when Maher was brutal to her. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
It's already been established that Fluke is a political activist - hence, a politician - hence, a public figure. http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012...ghts-activist/ Originally Posted by I B HankeringAnd we have discussed the difference between wanting to be a star and actually being one.
And we have discussed the difference between wanting to be a star and actually being one. Assessing who or who is not a 'star' is a chore relegated to the passive viewer. Whereas, a baseball player is a baseball player whether s/he is playing in the Little Leagues or professionally...
Same holds true for politicians. School board members are politicians just like U.S. Senators. 'You', as a viewer, can choose which one is or is not a 'star', but they are both still politicians.
Was Rahm Emanuel less a politician because he didn't actually hold office, before his current stint as mayor, and just worked on Obama's staff? What about James Carville?
Running for National office is different than testifying before congress as a witness. Fluke's activism precedes her testimony. That's why the Dems used her. Fluke was a 'ringer'.
Shit, Rush played right into the rookie's hand. Had he said nothing this would not be going on. He messed up. Rush can defend himself. Originally Posted by WTF