First sports, now the military. I’m sure WTF approves:
https://api.parler.com/l/jHHwV
Seems like under the Harris/Biden administration Transgenders and illegal aliens are making out like bandits!!!!
What movies are you two watching...Brokeback Mountain? Originally Posted by WTFGeez, I thought you said you were done for today. I don’t blame you. You got smacked harder than Chuck Wepner. But you’re like a Timex watch. You take a licken and keep on ticken. Now, I’ll predict WTF will say he doesn’t care what people on ECCIE think about him. But he does, bigly.
Geez, I thought you said you were done for today. I don’t blame you. You got smacked harder than Chuck Wepner. But you’re like a Timex watch. You take a licken and keep on ticken. Now, I’ll predict WTF will say he doesn’t care what people on ECCIE think about him. But he does, bigly. Originally Posted by bambinoFirst off....I'm not the one so insecure that I'm starting not one but two threads mentioning you. Some Mods would consider that a form of stalking.
thank you for your serviceWho would I rather have serving out country? You or transgendered Navy Seal Kristen Black?
is now
thank you for allowing us to serve you Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought
Though the two executive orders signed by Noem do not explicitly mention transgender athletes, they reference the supposed harms of the participation of “males” in women’s athletics — an echo of the transphobic claim, cited in other similar legislative initiatives, that transgender women are not women. The orders also reference “biological sex,” a disputed term that refers to the sex as listed on students’ original birth certificates.To Cole, the activist phrase “transphobic” is a matter of simple fact, fit for use by a hard-news writer, but the phrase “biological sex” is apparently disputed.
At stake in the so-called Equality Act, currently before the Senate, is neither women’s sports nor bathrooms, at least not ultimately. At stake is the freedom of rational human beings to use a common vocabulary when speaking about what all can see. . . .McCarthy is right. The debate over the Equality Act — or over the South Dakota bill Noem vetoed — isn’t ultimately a debate about bathrooms or sports teams. It’s a debate about whether we as a society are on board with the program of pretending that men and women are interchangeable, that the realities of biological sex and human nature can be erased if we pretend hard enough. We know which side CNN is on.
The Equality Act doesn’t concern such invisible mysteries as the Holy Trinity, for example. That is a matter of belief in the strict sense, though it isn’t irrational or private. Rather, the Equality Act concerns things everyone can see and understand. Infants don’t need instruction to know that their mothers are the ones who are nursing them, and their fathers are the ones who are not. Sexual difference is obvious to anyone with eyes to see.
Did you know that there is no possible way to know at birth, if a child is a boy or girl? Yep! Man, the things one can learn from CNN! Originally Posted by HedonistForever