Besides, this celebration distracts from the failure of Obamacare and the upcoming fight on amnesty.
As ole LBJ himself said, "I will have those Ni--eras voting Democrat for the next 200 years".
http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/7700...r-the-next-200
Just look what the "Great Society" as got the Black Community.
The highest unemployment rate of any ethic group
3 out of every 4 black babies are born out of we'd lock
A vast disproportion of young Black Men in Prison
Family's herded into "Projects", which are just centralized ghettos.
Good job. And Blacks continue to vote overwhelming for Democrat Candidates. Originally Posted by Jackie S
They are "celebrating" LBJ's war on poverty this week. It is 50 years since the dems started helping blacks and other minorities rise up and live the American dream. It is estimated that 20 trillion, TRILLION, dollars has changed hands from the creators of wealth to the consumers of wealth. The poverty rate is almost the same as it was in 1964. So if you spend $20 trillion and change nothing then I guess by common terms it is a failure, by democratic terms it is a rousing success. The democrats have achieved their goal.OK. What's your plan? Oh...wait....you don't have one? Because people that are poor deserve to be poor? And, because we shouldn't try to do anything to alleviate the suffering that is endemic to being poor? Because it's better to be a fuckstick jackwagon asshole who ridicules and makes fun of the opposition political parties' efforts to do something about poverty? When you and yours haven't done fucking shit and never will because you don't care about anybody except yourselves?
Besides, this celebration distracts from the failure of Obamacare and the upcoming fight on amnesty. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
As ole LBJ himself said, "I will have those Ni--eras voting Democrat for the next 200 years".Hey Timmy! If this is what your caring and concern results in, after $20 trillion, please hate me! I can't afford your kind oh "help".
http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/7700...r-the-next-200
Just look what the "Great Society" as got the Black Community.
The highest unemployment rate of any ethic group
3 out of every 4 black babies are born out of we'd lock
A vast disproportion of young Black Men in Prison
Family's herded into "Projects", which are just centralized ghettos.
Good job. And Blacks continue to vote overwhelming for Democrat Candidates. Originally Posted by Jackie S
OK. What's your plan? Oh...wait....you don't have one? Because people that are poor deserve to be poor? And, because we shouldn't try to do anything to alleviate the suffering that is endemic to being poor? Because it's better to be a fuckstick jackwagon asshole who ridicules and makes fun of the opposition political parties' efforts to do something about poverty? When you and yours haven't done fucking shit and never will because you don't care about anybody except yourselves?That's your standard for success? What people's intentions are when they do something? Nothing has changed for the poor except a higher rate of them are black than in the 60s. How about if I do a little dance and slice up a virgin to make it stop being cold? My intentions are good but the results are bad, predictably bad. After World War II unemployment was high as was poverty. Millions of men returning looking for jobs. Within 15 years poverty was much lower as well as unemployment and the federal government had done nothing. Ditto the 1920s when Calvin Coolidge handled a dramatic fall of the economy by doing nothing. The recovery was so quick that most people don't even remember that major meltdown of the stock market.
Does that about cover it, Admiral? Eat shit. Originally Posted by timpage
They are "celebrating" LBJ's war on poverty this week. It is 50 years since the dems started helping blacks and other minorities rise up and live the American dream. It is estimated that 20 trillion, TRILLION, dollars has changed hands from the creators of wealth to the consumers of wealth. The poverty rate is almost the same as it was in 1964. So if you spend $20 trillion and change nothing then I guess by common terms it is a failure, by democratic terms it is a rousing success. The democrats have achieved their goal.I don't believe that you have presented all the relevant facts here. The wealth of the richest Americans has gone up considerably since the war on poverty has begun. Don't Republicans consider that a successful program?
Besides, this celebration distracts from the failure of Obamacare and the upcoming fight on amnesty. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
I don't believe that you have presented all the relevant facts here. The wealth of the richest Americans has gone up considerably since the war on poverty has begun. Don't Republicans consider that a successful program? Originally Posted by Bert JonesI don't think you understand what you just posted. The war on poverty was a complete failure from it's inception to it's non-completion. The GOP has never endorsed this program but the democrats hail it as a great victory. You can see the results; higher unemployment, higher out of wedlock births, more crime, less income, etc. This is what the democrats are celebrating and as Timmie illustrated, all because of intentions. The outcome doesn't matter, it is all about the intentions...or what they call the intentions. I, and a good many other, harken back to what LBJ said about blacks and the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Their intentions were to enslave the black population as a ready made voter base for the democratic party. Field slaves you might call them. Their job is to turn the soil, plant the seeds, and pick the votes for the DNC. Successful people don't need government to look after them or to promise them things that won't really be provided. They don't need the democratic party.
I don't think you understand what you just posted. The war on poverty was a complete failure from it's inception to it's non-completion. The GOP has never endorsed this program but the democrats hail it as a great victory. You can see the results; higher unemployment, higher out of wedlock births, more crime, less income, etc. This is what the democrats are celebrating and as Timmie illustrated, all because of intentions. The outcome doesn't matter, it is all about the intentions...or what they call the intentions. I, and a good many other, harken back to what LBJ said about blacks and the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Their intentions were to enslave the black population as a ready made voter base for the democratic party. Field slaves you might call them. Their job is to turn the soil, plant the seeds, and pick the votes for the DNC. Successful people don't need government to look after them or to promise them things that won't really be provided. They don't need the democratic party. Originally Posted by JD BarleycornMaybe people who are successful at stripping the wealth out of the economy and paying very little money don't need help, but the rest of us do.
I don't think you understand what you just posted. The war on poverty was a complete failure from it's inception to it's non-completion. The GOP has never endorsed this program but the democrats hail it as a great victory. You can see the results; higher unemployment, higher out of wedlock births, more crime, less income, etc. This is what the democrats are celebrating and as Timmie illustrated, all because of intentions. The outcome doesn't matter, it is all about the intentions...or what they call the intentions. I, and a good many other, harken back to what LBJ said about blacks and the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Their intentions were to enslave the black population as a ready made voter base for the democratic party. Field slaves you might call them. Their job is to turn the soil, plant the seeds, and pick the votes for the DNC. Successful people don't need government to look after them or to promise them things that won't really be provided. They don't need the democratic party. Originally Posted by JD BarleycornAs usual, you're a fucking idiot. Sorry, Admiral but lots of folks don't happen to think that the war on poverty was a failure.