I bet Ukraine wishes it hadn't given back their nukes to Russia!

Now maybe we know why countries want nukes...

https://m.timesofindia.com/world/rus...w/89322947.cms


.

Another misguided thought provoking thread.

What a thoughtful, intelligent person ought to be speculating about is why this country has allowed and IS ALLOWING under the current administration the development of nuclear weapons in countries that use them to hold other countries hostage by threats of using them against other countries if they interfere with their invasions and TAKING aka ROBBERY of the natural resources of the target country.

Someone wasn't around during the Cuban Missile Crisis.

This might be helpful to study ... "self-help" ...



It seems to work for your criminal jury trial evaluations!

What a thoughtful, intelligent person ought to be speculating about is why this country has allowed and IS ALLOWING under the current administration the development of nuclear weapons in countries that use them to hold other countries hostage by threats of using them against other countries if they interfere with their invasions and TAKING aka ROBBERY of the natural resources of the target country.

! Originally Posted by LexusLover

Speak English

Should Ukraine have given their nukes back to Russia. Simple question.

Enough of your ancient history concerning Cuba. What next....an Alamo tutorial

It seems to work for your criminal jury trial evaluations! Originally Posted by LexusLover

Don't you mean predictions on the outcome of a trial BEFORE the verdict?

You only like to pontificate AFTER the verdict.

You know what they say, even a blind hog can find a truffle every now and then. WTF stumbled into something according to his OP. I don't know if he got the rest of the message (probably not). Why did Ukraine give up their nukes? Democrats from the United States and Bill Clinton. They didn't like the idea of someone having the will and power to stand up to Russia so they put economic pressure (is there any other kind?) on Ukraine to "do the right thing". Clinton (and England) promised that if Ukraine ever came under attack that the US would come riding to the rescue. Funny that no reporter has put a microphone in front of Bill or his co-president Hillary and asked the question.

What a thoughtful, intelligent person ought to be speculating about is why this country has allowed and IS ALLOWING under the current administration the development of nuclear weapons in countries that use them to hold other countries hostage by threats of using them against other countries if they interfere with their invasions and TAKING aka ROBBERY of the natural resources of the target country.

Originally Posted by LexusLover

You offer no solutions from your easy chair. Only bloviating.

You offer no solutions from your easy chair. Originally Posted by VitaMan

You can't afford the advice, and I do have standards for giving it. Here! Share with WTF:

You know what they say, even a blind hog can find a truffle every now and then. WTF stumbled into something according to his OP. I don't know if he got the rest of the message (probably not). Why did Ukraine give up their nukes? Democrats from the United States and Bill Clinton. They didn't like the idea of someone having the will and power to stand up to Russia so they put economic pressure (is there any other kind?) on Ukraine to "do the right thing". Clinton (and England) promised that if Ukraine ever came under attack that the US would come riding to the rescue. Funny that no reporter has put a microphone in front of Bill or his co-president Hillary and asked the question. Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

Bill got his speaking engagements for 1/2 million a piece and HillariousNomore got her "Trump dossier" in return for their help to Putin and his Klan.

Remember hearing USA took delivery of nuclear material from somewhere in east europe years ago. Might have been what was in the weapons. All parties agreed to it seeing it would lower possibility of terrorist and such getting ahold of it since security of stuff wasn't good. What happened afterwards, idk.

bill is bringing back to life his global clinton initiative

bill is bringing back to life his global clinton initiative Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

And they say people can't get donny out of their head.
When was the last time billy was in office?

Oh yeah. Last time USA coffers where in the black.

bill is bringing back to life his global clinton initiative Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

And Millard Fillmore cheated while playing dominos

And they say people can't get donny out of their head.
When was the last time billy was in office?

Oh yeah. Last time USA coffers where in the black. Originally Posted by Precious_b

bullshit. prove it.

Remember hearing USA took delivery of nuclear material from somewhere in east europe years ago. Might have been what was in the weapons. All parties agreed to it seeing it would lower possibility of terrorist and such getting ahold of it since security of stuff wasn't good. What happened afterwards, idk. Originally Posted by Precious_b

You just made THE CASE for not allowing Iran to have nukes. Unlike the lunatics "in office" now at the WH, the Israelis would rather die than allow the Iranians to have them.

Putin would rather scorch and suffocate the Earth rather than allow anyone else to "inherit" it. There are two kinds of people like that: VERY young mentally and VERY damaged mentally. His thinking: If he can't have it no one else will have it! Who did he call? THE FRENCH!

Your "deliver" recollection may have been Libyian in origin ...

https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/LibyaChronology

On December 19, 2003, long-time Libyan President Muammar Gaddafi stunned much of the world by renouncing Tripoli’s weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programs and welcoming international inspectors to verify that Tripoli would follow through on its commitment.

Following Gaddafi’s announcement, inspectors from the United States, United Kingdom, and international organizations worked to dismantle Libya’s chemical and nuclear weapons programs, as well as its longest-range ballistic missiles.

I recall that quiet diplomatic win for this country and the Middle East.

bullshit. prove it. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Ah. Can always trust waco to pounce on something yet yield nothing. And always so willing to supply links that aren't weighted on one side and of high factual content. But that's okay. I do like people to point out any errors I may say. So, thank you.

I should have stated the shape of both the budget and deficit.
At that time, it was a pretty good run.

But donny could not duplicate the same.